The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests


Monbiot on Fishing

Tuesday, 8th July 2008

I don't often say this about George Monbiot pieces but this is really rather good today. Yes, fisheries are in an awful state, yes, just about everything that governments do about them makes things worse and yes, there is a better way. (This blog post has hints as to what that better way is).

Just one little point though:

Why does every representative of a fishing region believe he must defend his constituents' right to ensure that their children have nothing to inherit?

Quite true: the solution though is for the right to the fish being the property of the fishermen and thus being something which they can hand on to their children, as farmers can their land and as we know, that does indeed aid in combatting the basic problem, the Tragedy of the Commons.

One more little point: the number of fish in a fishery (and yes, you do have to have restricted access for this to be true) being run for optimal profit is in fact higher than the minimum sustainable population. Yes, if fishermen were allowed to own the asset for the long term, there would be more fish in the sea.

Perhaps that shouldn't really surprise us: farmers do indeed tend to have more animals, a higher crop yield, upon their land than the same land would without their ownership and stewardship, don't they?

Blogs: Americano | Coffee House | Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Stephen Pollard

Actions: Print this article   |   Email to a friend   |   Permalink   |   Comments (2)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Post a comment


Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

Ruairidh

July 9th, 2008 9:01am

Yes but it is easier to subdivide and partion the land than the sea. Fish are also unhelpfully mobile so while neighbouring farmers cannot harvest each others corn, neighbouring fisherman can catch each others fish.

Therefore giving the fishermen rights over their own sea would need to be done at a larger (community/regional/national) level. This leaves the tragedy of the commons effect untouched.

Tim Worstall

July 9th, 2008 12:32pm

Not untouched: reduced.

Where it's actually being tried (Faroes, Iceland etc) there are more fish.

The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
Weekly update

A new job for the IMF: as global policeman

Elliot Wilson 26/11/2008

Carbon footprints

Elisabeth Jeffries 26/11/2008

General Motors must be allowed to crash

Matthew Lynn 26/11/2008

‘These clouds will have a silver lining’

Judi Bevan 19/11/2008
Spectator recommends

The Captains Choice Tour

Luxury all inclusive travel to remote and exotic destinations.

Book Farm and Cottage Holidays Direct

Save money on your farm and cottage holiday by booking direct with the owner. We have a range of places...


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other