I don't often say this about George Monbiot pieces but this is really rather good today. Yes, fisheries are in an awful state, yes, just about everything that governments do about them makes things worse and yes, there is a better way. (This blog post has hints as to what that better way is).
Just one little point though:
Why does every representative of a fishing region believe he must defend his constituents' right to ensure that their children have nothing to inherit?
Quite true: the solution though is for the right to the fish being the property of the fishermen and thus being something which they can hand on to their children, as farmers can their land and as we know, that does indeed aid in combatting the basic problem, the Tragedy of the Commons.
One more little point: the number of fish in a fishery (and yes, you do have to have restricted access for this to be true) being run for optimal profit is in fact higher than the minimum sustainable population. Yes, if fishermen were allowed to own the asset for the long term, there would be more fish in the sea.
Perhaps that shouldn't really surprise us: farmers do indeed tend to have more animals, a higher crop yield, upon their land than the same land would without their ownership and stewardship, don't they?
Blogs: Americano | Coffee House | Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Stephen Pollard
Actions: Print this article | Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (2)
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
A new job for the IMF: as global policeman
Elliot Wilson 26/11/2008 Elisabeth Jeffries 26/11/2008General Motors must be allowed to crash
Matthew Lynn 26/11/2008‘These clouds will have a silver lining’
Judi Bevan 19/11/2008Luxury all inclusive travel to remote and exotic destinations.
Save money on your farm and cottage holiday by booking direct with the owner. We have a range of places...
Luxury all inclusive travel to remote and exotic destinations.
Save money on your farm and cottage holiday by booking direct with the owner. We have a range of places...
PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique
ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit www.romanreference.com and www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.
Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs! You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other
Spectator Business | Apollo Magazine
Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2008 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Ruairidh
July 9th, 2008 9:01amYes but it is easier to subdivide and partion the land than the sea. Fish are also unhelpfully mobile so while neighbouring farmers cannot harvest each others corn, neighbouring fisherman can catch each others fish.
Therefore giving the fishermen rights over their own sea would need to be done at a larger (community/regional/national) level. This leaves the tragedy of the commons effect untouched.
Tim Worstall
July 9th, 2008 12:32pmNot untouched: reduced.
Where it's actually being tried (Faroes, Iceland etc) there are more fish.