Subscribe to The Spectator

Saturday 26 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Thursday, 27th August 2009

The art of deception

Lloyd Evans 9:36am

I’ve seen it. It was horrible and it was gorgeous. The first totally outrageous but superbly achieved penalty-dive of the Champions League season occurred in the 28th minute of last night’s second-leg tie between Arsenal and Celtic. It was a thing of complicated beauty, of exhilarating awfulness, of curious and furious energies. The Arsenal forward Eduardo chased into the area after a ball that was rushing away from him, tripped over a blade of grass and collapsed like a stricken fawn beneath the blamelessly splayed hands of Boruc, the Celtic goalie. Eduardo’s theatrics duped the ref who pointed immediately at the penalty spot, ignoring the Broadmoor-standard convulsions of anger from Celtic’s outraged defence. The kick was taken, by Eduardo himself, before a grandstand heaving with hate-filled Celtic indignants, one of whom tried to even things up by shining a laser in Eduardo’s eyes. The Arsenal con-man sauntered forward, sent the goalie the wrong way, and patted the ball into the net. I don’t support Arsenal but I have to admire the flawless brilliance of this strike. Poor old Boruc, in paroxysms of rage, picked up the dead ball and kicked it at the face of the moon. The aggregate score stood at 3-0. Arsenal’s victory was effectively sealed.

Three more goals followed. Eboue’s strike in the 53rd minute was a team-effort of sinuous loveliness: the unpredictable complexity of the build-up play and the off-beat but logical strangeness of its execution gave every viewer that magical momentary heart-lift all football fans crave.

Arshavin scored a decent third goal and Donati hammered in a late consolation for Celtic, hitting a ridiculously improbable full-volley from what looked like a position half-way up the tunnel.

Afterwards no one talked about these fine goals. It was the dive. The dive was the only talking-point. Arsene Wenger claimed to believe it wasn’t a dive. Blushingly, haltingly, incredibly, he defended Eduardo’s tactics. ‘But we would not have complained if it had not been given’, he added, juggling his pluperfect subjunctives as niftily as one of his forwards claiming a non-existent foul.

Robbie Earle, the post-match pundit on ITV, devoted several minutes to the dive. Various angles were shown. Close-up footage revealed Eduardo’s guilty smirk as the wrong verdict was given. Celtic defenders were seen, one of them harrying and jostling Eduardo nastily, another facetiously congratulating him on his consummate play-acting. Only after the dive had been analysed and celebrated could the discussion turn to the passages of lawful play. Why? Why is the successful cheat more noteworthy than the law-abiding toiler who scores lovely and legal goals? Because football occupies a weird parallel universe. It’s the very best and the very worst of sports. All other athletic pursuits are about love – about loving the players, the achievements, the game. In football it’s about hate – hating the opposition, hating the supporters, hating the manager, (especially if he used to be your manager and you used to love him).  

The cheat is interesting because he is detestable instantly, whereas the lawful player is just boringly admirable. The tospy-turvy extremity of feeling generated by football affects everyone. Even people who ignore sport will cheerfully admit to ‘hating’ football with a passion that would seem bonkers if applied to, say, badminton or synchronised swimming. It’s the depth and universality of our hatred that makes football special. It attracts extreme emotions, and extreme wages too, which is why it’s futile to object to soaring Premiership salaries.

Excessive riches are right for a sport which is a ceremony of excess. What’s good for football is good for us all. Let the stars earn colossal sums, spend them, gamble them, waste them. That’s their function. Let them have more opportunities to crash their cars, dodge their drug-tests, punch their photographers, beat their wives, bilk their debts, ravish their lapdancers and wallow in their tasteless materialism. The worse they behave the stronger our hate becomes. And deep down – this is the sad truth – we are all football fans. We have the football fan’s instincts. The more we hate, the happier we are.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Coffee House

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (2) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Paul B

August 27th, 2009 11:15am Report this comment

What about Rugby Union and the Bloodgate scandal by the establishment club Harlequins, coached by x policeman Dean Richards. That is cheating to a diabolical level. If I were in charge of the RFU, the not so mighty Quins would be booted out of the Premiership, now that would hurt.

Whereas diving is very hard to prove, its only takes the merest of touches to knock a sprinting athlete over - as the tap tackle in Rugby demonstrates. I am not so convinced Eduado did in fact dive. I envy you Lloyd in your certainty. I speak as Chelsea fan.

Hit the post

August 28th, 2009 6:43pm Report this comment

It's an interesting post Lloyd but I think the reaction coverage was guided by the key moments as opposed to the dive itself. If Eduardo had dived in the 93rd minute when Arsenal were already 3-0 to the good there would not have been the same focus on it.

Similarly, if Donati's superb goal had won the game or at least brought it to a closer contest then it would have merited closer discussion than it did as the poorest of consolations.

The fact is though there are displays of excellence in the majority of football matches, bare-faced cheating which directly leads to a goal is less common. I didn't think the coverage was over the top.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Cappuccino Culture archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk