The crown jewels
David Blackburn 7:08pm
The break up of the BBC is, along with tax, death and toothache, now one of life’s inevitabilities. The man behind the Conservatives’ plan is Jeremy Hunt, the Shadow Culture Secretary, and in today’s Telegraph, Andrew Pierce adds to the clamour for Hunt to demolish Reith’s monolith:
The gradual deconstruction of a corporation that exports first rate material across the globe can only be negative; but if it has to be done, the BBC’s near monopoly on local news, radio and television is the privilege that should be surrendered. The current situation is anti-competitive and does little to serve the needs of local communities and the digital revolution will enable this transfer to proceed with ease. Add a much needed salary cap on executive and talent pay to that and the taxpayer has received value for money and the Tories make their gesture. In short, there is no need to sell off BBC Three and Four or Radio One and Three for the sake of it. There are lesser baubles among the Beeb’s crown jewels that can be flogged off first.‘He revealed that he is determined to take on the BBC monolith, which threatens the survival of regional television, radio, and newspapers to the detriment of the local communities they serve. He is proposing a "Big Bang" of deregulation of the rules surrounding media ownership, in an attempt to attract major new international investors into Britain. Surely he is right to do so – why, after all, does no one want to buy ITV, home of The X Factor, I'm a Celebrity… and countless other box-office bankers?Hunt also plans to rip up the cross-media ownership rules, which prevent regional newspaper groups from investing in local radio and television – this should put a block on the BBC's publicly funded operations, and its omnipresent website, crushing the opposition.’



Previous




Fergus Pickering
November 18th, 2009 3:26am Report this commentYou don't mean deconstruction. You mean destruction. Or you might mean pulling apart. Deconstruction is a term of art and should not be used as you have used it. Why have you done so? Because the word is new and trendy, like the philosophy that gave it its birth. Nevertheless, new and trendy though it is, it remains the WRONG word. In fact, unless you wish to refer to the likes of Derrida and other dodgy frogs, you can go happily throough your life without using the word at all.
Pete W
November 18th, 2009 1:41pm Report this commentIs there a lesser bauble than BBC 3? Are you sure?
Back to top