How Cameron can mend the broken society
4:26pm
Was the Rhys Jones murder just a crime, or the result of a new phenomenon? The answer splits left and right. We’ve heard strikingly little from Gordon Brown – and little wonder. The idea of there being a “broken society” undermines his credo. Has Britain not benefited from ten years of a Labour government dedicated to making things better for the worse off? What about all those child tax credits, those being (ahem) “lifted out of poverty”? Surely these people are all better off?
During the Labour years, violent crime has more than doubled. Youth unemployment is higher than under the Tories, lone parenthood is at a record high. These are the three symptoms of what Charles Murray identifies as an underclass. The state is bankrolling family break-up, and tearing at the bonds which tie the young to the old and communities to each other. The social decay we are witnessing in Britain is happening because of Labour welfare policies, not in spite of them.
Hence Brown’s silence. To acknowledge the scope of the problem is to admit that his policies are going badly wrong. His Sure Start centres aren’t working. His “new jobs” are a boon to Poland, but not Britain where one in seven is on benefits. This is a very good opportunity for the Prime Minister to maintain a sheepish silence.
It is the time for David Cameron to speak, and his words today are precisely what is required. Its title “it’s time to fight back” is precisely the message needed – we can do something about this, but first we need to recognise the problem. His “broken society” analysis has never rung more true than in the last few days. He offers hard-nosed policies like prison building, and Nick Herbert’s police reform agenda, which (to my mind) never gets the recognition it deserves. Overall, Cameron projects exactly the kind of urgency and optimism needed. This is the kind of campaign that wins elections.
I have one quibble. I wish he’d ditch all this “what do we expect from society?” stuff and his calls for a “social covenant” where we are, apparently, being asked to behave better as a society. I know Cameron means to be humble, pointing to the limitations of government action against the stronger force of wider influences. This is one of his favourite topics. But British culture is not Cameron’s to command, or criticise. The broken society issue simply means that the poorest are being segregated, paid to go away and live on edge-of-town estates dependent on the state. Government is causing this problem; government can fix it.
And it is doable. America, home of the gansta rap music, pulled itself out of this social nosedive in the 1990s by Clinton’s family-based welfare reform and Giuliani’s zero-tolerance policing. Result: America is now celebrating its lowest violent crime rates for decades with violent crime down 70% in New York. As Lord (John) Stevens put it in the News of the World this Sunday, “Don't tell me we can't do the same for Britain, a land where decent people cower behind their curtains, terrified to challenge the swaggering feral louts who have all but seized control”. As the chief says, Britain can pull itself out of this mess. All it takes is the right political leadership. Cameron’s best chance at the next election is to offer it.







Previous

Comments
Let's wait until we have the full details of this case before we all leap to conclusions.
Vincenzo M C Rampulla
August 29th, 2007 4:35amIt is all very well saying that Cameron should take control and give us the plan for a better tomorrow.
BUT! The main problem is that we, as a country, don't want to face up to the difficult questions which need to be asked to know what it is we actually want.
More prisons or more rehabilitation; less taxes or better public services; strong 'nanny' state or minimal government intervention.
Whilst the British people are liberal they are also a weird conservative type of liberal. So we have a dilemma, what does Cameron bring to the table that is different from Major, Thatcher, etc, which we couldn't get from Brown?
John Whitworth
August 29th, 2007 8:33amCome now. These are false choices. What about more prisons and more rehabilitation, lower taxes and better public services (do you not understand anything about economics?), weaker central state, stronger local government (elected chief constables anyone?) What is weird about a conservative liberal? I am one myself. So is Boris Johnson, judging by what he writes. I thought most Spectator readers were like that.
Mike Evans
August 29th, 2007 9:59amUnfortunately the feral louts are not confined to the edges of town. Have you seen the adverts by local authorities, asking landlords to get in touch with them? The result of these contacts is people moving in next door to you, at the expense of you and people like you, who do nothing but drink and make noise - at best. Have you noticed how there are fewer and fewer decent areas in our cities? Take a look at Bristol, for instance. The vast private housing estate, Bradley Stoke, is now a range for louts. Southmead is thrusting into Westbury on Trym. Fishponds' ways extend to Horfield. College Green is for skateboarders, Park Street begins to look like a shuttered Somerset chav town, complete with pool rooms where the elegant Berkley Restaurant once sat. No wonder the Old Vic can’t get an audience.
Perry
August 29th, 2007 12:16pmThe antidote to the pernicious tide of drivel (and consequences) about poverty and deprivation (in UK) is to rebuild and maintain strong affective and practical ties to family and society, local and general. That means an end to gush about the ‘individual’ as an entity, per se. Instead, more focus on the individual as an amalgam of genetic and nurturing influences, with undiluted attention to positive and Real education. As an example of the Foolish State, consider the nonsense (& dosh) thrown at SureStart (sic) to see that money and material is not the answer, as any fule kno.
Colonial M
September 5th, 2007 1:04pmFirst the left attacked and destroyed all the old values. A vacume was created. They then turn social pyramid upside down. And the chattering masses fills the vacume. Fairly obvious is it not?