The Tories have their biggest ever lead, Labour at record low
James Forsyth 3:16pm
The 24 point lead the Tories have in this month’s Ipsos/Mori political monitor is their largest since the survey began after the 1979 election. The 48 percent they scored is the highest they have ever been in opposition and their best performance since January 1988 when they were at 50 percent—their highest ever score.
By contrast, Labour’s 24 percent is its worst ever performance in the monthly survey.
For those interested in comparing how the Tories are doing compared to New Labour in opposition, in 1995 Blair’s Labour party was consistently scoring in the mid to high fifties. But in every election apart from 1987, Labour has underperformed its poll ratings.



Previous






The Chocolate Orange Intifada
August 21st, 2008 4:11pm Report this commentThat's "the Tories" - generic. You shouldn't confuse this with any enthusiasm for David Cameron.
David Lindsay
August 21st, 2008 4:31pm Report this commentIsn't it all thrilling?
You do realise, don't you, that there will be absolutely no *political* change whichever of them wins, and that abstentions are therefore quite likely to be more numerous than votes for both of them put together?
Bernard from Horsham
August 21st, 2008 4:31pm Report this commentJames
Polling methodology has changed since 95 you cannot compare 95 with the present day
Anon
August 21st, 2008 4:52pm Report this commentThe Conservatives shouldn't crow about such a lead. The electorate have been educated in the past eleven years and if 'they' think that swapping DG for DC or swapping Labour for Conservative will make a difference to the attitude of this country, 'they' have another thing coming.
We need a completely revitalised approach to government: DC? I don't think so.
David
August 21st, 2008 5:02pm Report this comment"But in every election apart from 1987, Labour has underperformed its poll ratings."
This is very significant. Labour nearly always do slightly worse than their poll ratings suggest, whereas the Conservatives tend to do a bit better. Nothing is in the bag yet, and Cameron has recognised that, but such significant margins must be causing some brown trousers in No.10.
Mike, Brighton
August 21st, 2008 5:12pm Report this comment24% is Labour's client vote.
Are there any voters who will vote Labour that are not in some way it's clients through the public sector or welfare state?
None
Tara
August 21st, 2008 6:40pm Report this commentMeanwhile, over in New Labour's lala land they are on course to WIN the next general election, according to Gordon Brown. The man and the party are in denial.
TEL
August 21st, 2008 6:42pm Report this commentWhen Blair was leader of the opposition they might have been scoring in the fifties but at the general they only achieved a 12 point lead. Also polling has been adjusted since then due to the fact that there was a bias in Labour's favour.
Carly
August 21st, 2008 6:45pm Report this commentOver on PB Mike Smithson has a 'golen rule', which is:
The most accurate poll when tested against real votes has been the one that has had Labour in the least favourable position.
Mike goes on to provide evidence for this golen rule by saying,'based on two decades of general elections, every single London mayoral race and every single by election where there has been polling the “golden rule” has applied.'
BOJO FAN
August 21st, 2008 6:47pm Report this commentOff topic, but I thought BOJO was great on the BBC's Who do you think you are? last night.
Rita
August 21st, 2008 8:13pm Report this commentThe Autumn relaunch/economic recovery plan better be pretty spectacular or it's gonna go down like a lead ballon, he's been hyping it up since May's locals.
Oscar
August 21st, 2008 8:50pm Report this commentI do get fed up with the bash Dave brigade who transfer their own animosity towards DC to the rest of the population. Look chaps you should face facts - the man is popular with the public. Everytime he appears in the media Conservative poll rating go up. I know it's hard for you to imagine, but do try a bit of objectivity.
Teledu
August 21st, 2008 8:50pm Report this commentYep Mike - I think your right.
And whilst Cameron might not be viewed with much enthusiasm, maybe that doesn't matter too much because Brown (and zaNuLabour) are viewed with utter distaste by the rest of the electorate; they detest the guy. So much so that the opposition could be led by a microwave oven and still win in 2010.
DM
August 21st, 2008 9:32pm Report this commentBojo fan -
Couldn't agree more.
Verity
August 21st, 2008 11:21pm Report this commentBOJO FAN - We have The Wall for O/T comments. Go the right and scroll down past the blogs. Just after Americano, they've put up The Wall for us to scribble on.
Mike, Brighton - Re the socialists' client vote, this is why we need to disenfranchise the welfare sector and the public sector.
Their choice. They can retain all the privileges of the sector they're in, but they cannot vote. Anyone who's been on "job seeker's allowance" (why should they get an "allowance" for looking for a job?) for six months, for example, should have their name automatically taken off the voters' roll. When they're in work again, if ever, a simple click of the computer gets them back in the voting community.
The same with anyone working in the public sector - from real nappy outreach co-ordinators to the prime minister. You're already privileged by being excused from creating wealth and living off that created by your fellow citizens. One privilege is enough.
Again, if they value the vote so much, they can leave the public sector and become a wealth contributor and get clicked back onto the voters' roll.
I feel that this has to be addressed urgently, because the socialists will always enlarge the client state with a view to staying in office forever.
paul hill
August 21st, 2008 11:51pm Report this commentI have it on the highest authority that Mr Gordon Brown will win the next General Election...........oh yes
Chuck Unsworth
August 22nd, 2008 9:09am Report this commentVerity
Are you the Moderator here?
Verity
August 22nd, 2008 11:14am Report this commentChuck, no, I'm not. I directed someone to The Wall because it is wasting away in loneliness. After the first surge of interest, people seem to have stopped going there, and it's such a good idea. (Although one could argue that if people aren't utilising it, it's not a good idea.)
Back to top