Gordon's new friend
10:49am
There is nothing new in Gordon Brown’s taste for citizens’ juries and new forms of consultation – the cornerstone of his speech on the “New Politics” today – although his plan to review the Speakers’ Conference will repay careful study as part of what will clearly amount, in the end, to a substantial package of parliamentary reforms. It had emerged overnight that John Bercow, previously expected to defect to Labour from the Tories, will be advising the Government on children with learning difficulties, and the appointment of the Lib Dem, Matthew Taylor, to advise ministers on land use scarcely quickens the pulse. But for now let us acknowledge the truly astonishing news that the Prime Minister has hired Patrick Mercer, former Tory spokesman on homeland security, to advise Lord West, the security minister and former First Sea Lord. Mr Mercer, you may recall, was sacked from the Tory front bench in March after claiming that is just "the way it is" that a black soldier might be called a "black bastard", and that some "idle and useless" ethnic minority soldiers "used racism as cover for their misdemeanours". David Cameron saw Mr Mercer’s remarks as a test of his modernising credentials and declared them “totally unacceptable.” There was much grumbling at the time, on the grounds that Mr Mercer had been speaking empirically rather than polemically. Evidently, Mr Brown made a mental note at the time, and has now brought the disgruntled Right-winger into his own Big Tent. Mr Blair used to talk about “Operation Hoover”, his campaign to recruit One Nation Tories and Lib Dems to the New Labour cause. Mr Brown seems to have dumped the Hoover and got hold of a super-powered, commercial-use Dyson. Who’s next? Edward Leigh?



Previous






David
September 3rd, 2007 11:30am Report this commentPerhaps it might be a good idea to dig up some quotes from the Labour party about Mr Mercer not having a place in a modern day political party that wants to take itself seriously........
ACT
September 3rd, 2007 11:48am Report this commentYeah, we could dig up quotes from Mercer, a realist Tory who was always sceptical about British participation in an American war in Iraq, whilst being rock-solid about the need for effective counter-terror strategies here at home. We could also, though, dig up quotes from his critics, like Matthew d'Ancona for instance. Here's a pearler from Matt writing in the Sunday Telegraph (12th January 2003) just before the start of the war he's always cheer-led for: "The onus is explicitly upon Iraq "to comply with its disarmament obligations" and to explain what happened to the arms unaccounted for when the inspectors were expelled in 1998 - 400 bombs suitable for germ warfare, for instance, and 500 artillery shells bearing nerve gas. I don't know about you, but these gaps in the inventory scare the bejaysus out of me. Saddam may or may not have had indirect contact with those responsible for the September 11 atrocities, but that is scarcely the point: there is ample evidence that he was part of the 1993 plot to destroy the World Trade Center, and has acted as sponsor to terrorist groups all over the world. If you're worried about what a little bit of Ricin could do, imagine what horrors might be perpetrated with the Iraqi weapons which have gone missing since 1998. Sort of focuses the mind, doesn't it? " Hmmmn - Mercer's advice, or d'Ancona's advice? Gosh, I know which one I hope the government's listening to.
Back to top