Balls's independent thinking
Matthew d'Ancona 5:47am
The news that Ed Balls is to scrap the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and replace it with an independent body prompts two thoughts. First, Mr Balls is showing real promise as the man in charge of the nation's schools, and will be kept on his toes by his splendid Tory Shadow, Michael Gove. This is an excellent measure, and one that might just save the debauched currency of public examinations from slipping into Weimar oblivion. Mr Balls was the co-author with Gordon Brown of the decision to hand control of interest rates to the Bank of England: he understands that trust follows when politicians step aside.
Second, the proposal illustrates the injustice of Opposition politics. Damian Green, when Education Spokesman for the Tories, suggested exactly this in the wake of the Tomlinson inquiry into A level standards. He was given short shrift by the Government. But that was New Labour. This is New New Labour. It has "listened and learned" - which, this case, means stealing the other guy's best ideas. Good for the country, bad for the Tories.



Previous



hogarth zombie
September 26th, 2007 5:58am Report this commentDidn't J Major once say it was like going for a swim and discovering the other chap had stolen your clothes when you got back? Look what happened to him.
jimmy
September 26th, 2007 10:24am Report this commentGood for the country if (a) it is genuinely independent (un)like the bank of england, and (b) it takes an early political hit by dramatically lowering the percentages getting an A. One brave but necessary step is to remove the A* grade from GCSE, which has forever been the most transparent indicator of devaluation of that exam. I wonder how brave they will *actually* be... (By the way Matthew, may I humbly suggest giving a URL reference to news stories if they are in the public domain?).
Perry
September 26th, 2007 11:51am Report this commentThere is something deeply unsettling in this analysis. Can’t put my finger on it, - but it is something to do with the fact that the even IF the Tories had a good idea, - who knows about it? – or cares? - outside of a select, perhaps informed, circle? As I understand it, The Great Man took care at every turn to promote his views and analysis about events and the direction in which they were headed. Deeply unpopular, he persisted, but his voice WAS heard. I wonder what he would make of the oh-so-timid and shamefully PC opposition? Oh well, - never will know, - but I conjecture. [Afterthought : of course one could argue that times are different, - that there is no threat to this land, - either militarily or culturally, or socially. But would that be a helpful or accurate assessment?]
Perry
September 26th, 2007 12:42pm Report this comment[Further consideration] Perhaps it is the Lone Voice that attracts and holds attention. One is mindful of voices through the years that talked about, and held, a position. One is mindful of a sometimes dissonant London Mayoral candidate whose name invariably draws attention (and who I am bound to support – yea, even more so were he were candidate for PM). This dissonance is, to me at least, attractive (and I may say to many other thinking people). It separates such people from the sheep-like flock of people-who-graze, - even though the barn is on fire. Perhaps parties really are for the lumpen masses : individuals get things done. Let us – or me - look forward to hearing people who speak clearly and well about Issues That Matter – namely, things concerning our land, people, and culture.
Perry
September 26th, 2007 1:06pm Report this comment[Yet further consideration] Oh, - and in regards to the comment by Major, J. : one suspects that (a) The Great Man would not have shrunk from going to and fro naked (b) no-one would have doubted whose clothes had been stolen – and their nature.
Cogito Ergosum
September 26th, 2007 4:04pm Report this commentThe problem was not that the QCA controlled both the teaching and the exams, but that the government controlled the QCA. Detaching the exams from the QCA will solve nothing if the exams are still controlled by government, and will just generate more bureaucracy.
judith
September 27th, 2007 11:45am Report this commentSo, two useless quangos in place of one. Great. And how well did Brown's invention of 3 controls over banking do when the sh+t hit the fan? Think Northern Rock'n'roll'nfallover.
Back to top