What Osborne meant
Fraser Nelson 7:35pm
My interview with George Osborne in tomorrow's Spectator has caused much interest, particularly his contrasting of himself with the "uber modernisers". This phrase has travelled so fast that a Cabinet member I just met for coffee in Bournemouth had already heard it. "A split story right before conference," he grinned. "Just what they need. Osborne doesn't just acknowledge a faction, but christens one". Not quite fair. It was hardly a coded attack on Cameron, whom he heaped praise on. George was just stating the obvious, making it refreshingly clear where he personally stands in a party which is openly in the middle of a policy debate. Such candour isn't heard very often in politics. Perhaps this is why.
PS Read the interview here



Previous

Comments
edwardbenson
September 26th, 2007 7:55pmHmm. You say it was hardly a coded attack on Cameron, but if it looks like a coded attack and smells like a coded attack... At the very least, it looks like a pre-emptive move, designed to protect his own position if and when the Cameron project crumbles. ("I may be a moderniser, but I'm not one of the uber-modernisers who were really to blame for this whole mess.") Or maybe he's the one about to cross the floor?
Purple Scorpion
September 26th, 2007 8:34pmAnd read a demolition (not by me) here - http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2007/09/unter-moderniser.html
Tiberius
September 26th, 2007 11:30pmYes, another successfully sold piece of New Labour spin: we have debates (which actually they don't), but the Tories have splits.
alex seymour
September 27th, 2007 2:37am"It was hardly a coded attack on Cameron, whom he heaped praise on"
"Upon whom he heaped praise"....aint it?
Praguetory
September 27th, 2007 7:58amThere is no coded attack, but the interview is a bit thin. If all he can say about his Chancellory position is that it's David Cameron who decides who is shadow chancellor, not me, he should probably step down for someone with more focus on the task and put all his energies into his campaigning role. Good to hear him distance himself from the uber-modernisers, but actions speak louder than words and apart from his boss who in the party does he ally himself with?
Michael St George
September 27th, 2007 2:08pmDear Fraser You give Osborne too much credit. Boy George has been very careful not to utter anything that goes as far as being potentially categorisable as a coded attack; however, this undoubtedly was the first tentative, precautionary putting of a little distance between himself and Right-On Dave against the possibility that, election or no, the Cameroon project will start to unravel as its intellectual vacuity and its electoral ineffectiveness becomes ever more obvious. If he seriously imagines that, when that happens, he might therefore be positioned for the leadeship, then he has even less qualification to aspire to the office of Chancellor than was suggested by his refusal to even countenance the possibility that John Redwood's tax proposals might just be correct.
Oscar Miller
September 27th, 2007 5:07pmI see this as the opposite of a 'coded attack'. Isn't Osborne preparing the ground for Cameron - who is already positioning himself at a distance from the 'uber modernizers'. There was an improvement in the polls when Cameron talked tougher on law and order and then talked about immigration in the Newsnight interview. I'd say Osborne is following an agreed strategy probably overseen by Andy Coulson. But of course nuLab media are out for tory splits and tory splits they will find - invented or not.
Mike Wotan Kaye
September 27th, 2007 8:39pmlet's face it; any slight criticism of the "Dave Project", will be interpreted by all and sundry as a split or betrayal. The Cameron interlude will come to the end it deserves. And please chop down that gastly tree!