The Labour form book: Jon Cruddas
James Forsyth 11:42pmCoffee House is running a series of posts on the contenders to succeed Gordon Brown as Labour party leader. The latest is below. To read our profile of David Miliband, click here.
Jon Cruddas, 46
Pros
Clean hands: Cruddas has served in neither the Brown nor the Blair cabinets so it would be harder for the Tories to pin Labour’s failures on him, and he is not compromised by association with the failed Brown premiership. Also, Cruddas hasn’t been a participant in the Blairitie-Brownite wars so he gives Labour a chance to break out of that destructive cycle.
Anti-politics politics: Cruddas doesn’t look or sound like a typical Westminster politician. He would stand out from Cameron and Clegg. Cruddas is also far more of the grassroots politician—see his work in Dagenham against the BNP —than either Cameron or Clegg.
He understands that this is a new fight against a different enemy: The Labour party is split between those who are totally demoralised and those who think that all Labour need do is shout ‘same old Tories—Tory cuts’ and the public will ultimately give Labour a fourth term. Cruddas realises that the Tories have changed, and has ideas about how Labour should take the fight to this new enemy.
Cons
The public doesn’t know him: In the short term, this could be an advantage for Cruddas; he could have a Palin-style effect on Labour’s fortunes. But in the medium term this poses a problem, as it has with Palin. His public image is going to be phenomenally vulnerable—any slip or gaffe is really going to hurt him and if he gets the name of a major foreign leader wrong then his credibility on the world stage could be shot. Equally, the public could become disillusioned when they find that for all Cruddas’ differences with new Labour he has voted for the Iraq war, the abolition of the 10p tax rate and 42 days.
Life on Mars politics: The Tories will attack Cruddas as a lurch to the left, the end of New Labour and a return to the days when the unions set the Labour party’s agenda. However, there’s a danger in this for the Tories as there are political opportunities on the left at the moment, and Cruddas, who isn’t afraid of his own leftism, could pull off a rope-a-dope strategy.
A huge leap: No one in the last 100 years has become Prime Minister without having served on either front bench. Cruddas would have to be a true political natural to successfully step up several levels and succeed in the most economically trying time in a generation. Cruddas is undoubtedly the most high risk, high reward choice of the possible leadership candidates.
MP for Dagenham since June 2001
No ministerial roles
Swing required to unseat
12.35% from Labour to Conservative
Major rebellions
Voted against Government on ban on prison officers striking (Jan ’08)
Voted against Government on Trident replacement (March ’07)
Voted against Government on Education and Inspections Bill (March/May ’06)
Voted against Government on Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill — Clause 43 — Accommodation (March ’06)
Voted against Government on tuition fees (March ’04)



Previous





FactChecker
September 19th, 2008 7:41am Report this commentRe: Clean Hands
Let's not forget that Cruddas was a SpAd in Number 10 during the early Blair Years
D.G. Bull
September 19th, 2008 9:22am Report this commentPointless choosing him as leader because he wont keep his seat. He's not contesting Dagenham anymore, he's contesting Dagenham and Rainham a completely different kettle of fish. Also your projected swing is well out. It's actually 8.35% swing required with a notional majority of just over 6500. Cruddas is a fraud, says one thing and then votes another.
mac
September 19th, 2008 9:32am Report this commentA Cruddas manifesto will be the socialists second longest political suicide note in history.
Faceless Bureaucrat
September 19th, 2008 9:52am Report this commentNow you're talking...
idle
September 19th, 2008 9:54am Report this comment"Swing required to unseat: 12.35% from Labour to Conservative"
Somehow I don't see him surviving the next general election.
Next!
Max Kaye
September 19th, 2008 10:23am Report this commentSo.... you want to be PM one day, eh?
Hmmmm...
Ah.... yes.... hmmmm....
Thank you.
NEXT!
Liz Brown
September 19th, 2008 10:34am Report this commentWhere does he stand on reversing the smoking ban, a referendum on the Lisbon Con/Treaty etc. What I have read so far makes him as appealing as the rest of them - ie not at all
The Orange Party
September 19th, 2008 12:06pm Report this commentI've believed for a while that Cruddas, or someone like him, is the only way forward for the Labour Party. And no, this is not Dave Spart returning from the dead!
Voters have turned against New Labour but they don't particularly support the alternatives.
You've missed out the SNP here too. Glasgow East, for example, was as much a vote against Brown and New Labour, as a vote for the SNP. Salmond said as much in his victory speech.
A Labour Party, with true Labour values, would still lose the general election, but would certainly give Salmond in Scotland and Cameron in England a run for their money.
I observed back in July, that while Blairites and Brownites may be jockeying for position, the fight is actually over ownership of the Party.
http://theorangepartyblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/new-labour-v-true-labour-battle-begins.html
The reality though is that New Labour, in whatever guise, is too entrenched in the Party and in the minds of many in the Media elite and that means a wipe-out in the election.
That will hand Scotland to the SNP and England to Cameron's Conservatives but a handful of true Labour MPs will hang onto their seats.
Maybe that's not such a bad thing?
Andrea
September 19th, 2008 12:43pm Report this commentSo when are you profiling John McDonnell? Like Cruddas he's a backbencher, opposed all the unpopular bits of NL, and will keep his seat next time?
mac
September 19th, 2008 3:36pm Report this commentAh, John 'Another World is Possible' McDonnell. Vote for a monochromatic, 1960s vintage DDR.
jon crappas
September 19th, 2008 7:38pm Report this commentCruddas has a flat in Kensington and Chelsea and sends his son to the Cardinal Vaughn school - an extremely posh Catholic school near Kensington high st. ie a grammar by other means. Why didn't he send his son to a school in dagenham?
Back to top