The Labour form book: Jack Straw
Fraser Nelson 10:11pmCoffee House is running a series of posts on the contenders to succeed Gordon Brown as Labour party leader. The latest is below. Click here for our profile of David Miliband, here for Jon Cruddas, and here for Alan Johnson.
Jack Straw, 62, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
Pros
Experience: This is a man who has been an MP since 1979, and who - in his near thirty year career - has filled positions including Foreign Secretary and Home Secretary. On paper, at least, it's not a bad record, perhaps the best among any of the potential leadership candidates. Straw's got experience by the bucketful. And that's a useful commodity as the economic storm clouds darken.
Inoffensively grey: With a few exceptions, leaders in British politics are chosen for who they’re not. IDS was not Portillo, Major was not Heseltine, Thatcher was not Heath, Foot was not Healey, Wilson was not George Brown and Attlee was not anybody. So being grey or inoffensive is not a bad thing in politics. It means you don’t draw much opposition, and this is usually what wins.
He'd go for it: Unlike Purnell and Miliband Straw has nothing to lose, and ending your career as Prime Minister isn’t a bad way to go even if it is a kamikaze mission. He’d be a Michael Howard candidate, someone old enough to resign after losing the election. And who could win votes as a stop-gap candidate to hold the party together before it holds the awkward question about leadership.
He's an alright guy: I find him good company, and while I disagree with him on plenty issues I can’t really see the readers of my News of the World column writing in hate poems dedicated to him as they currently do about Brown. (“Gordon Brown’s from Scotty Town/His government’s a farce…" - you can guess the rest).
Cons
Not the "change" candidate: As the longest serving Cabinet member he’s a well-kent face (as they say in Kirkcaldy) and would struggle to say ‘renewal’. Cameron could very easily frame the election into a “future or the past” choice.
A stop-gap: By picking Straw, Labour would manifestly be choosing to lose with grace. It would, in itself, be an admission of defeat. Rather than putting all their energies into fighting the next election, Labour under Straw would already be thinking about the next leader. Straw could well be undermined by the same below-the-surface manoeuvrings that are aflicting the government now.
Too grey: Being grey can be inoffensive but it can also be just plain dull. Straw could turn out to be Labour's John Major.
MP for Blackburn since 1979
Lord Chancellor/Justice Secretary
2007-present
Leader of the House of Commons/Lord Privy Seal
2006 - 2007
Foreign Secretary
2001 - 2006
Home Secretary
1997 - 2001
Shadow Home Secretary
1994 - 1997
Shadow Secretary of State for Environment
1992- 1994
Shadow Education Spokesman
1987-1992
Swing required to unseat
10.6% from Labour to Conservative, or 11.3 to Lib Dem
Major rebellions
None



Previous





mac
September 21st, 2008 12:26am Report this commentStraw, the consummate trimmer.
Matthew Blott
September 21st, 2008 1:15am Report this commentFraser, you missed the important con that his Machiavellian manoeuvrings
(something all successful politicians have to perform to a degree) have been a little too conspicuous. It is easy to see why Tony Blair branded him a “political tart”.
JohnAnt
September 21st, 2008 1:35am Report this comment10.6%? He's toast then. Ah! But I forgot which constituency he represents. They vote, Jim, but not as we know it.
Simon R
September 21st, 2008 3:57am Report this commentThe Foreign Secretary who took us to our latest Suez! A man who, at the UN Security Council told Dominique DV, "..you are wrong.".
How on earth has he survived politically? His judgement is 120 degrees out.
David C
September 21st, 2008 10:01am Report this commentIs NuLabour ready to go gentle into that 'good night'?
Have the supporters of other candidates abandoned ideas of wresting the steering wheel from the maniac from Kirkcaldy and putting their own chosen son (or daughter - just for you Harriet) at the controls? - with just the tiniest hope of snatching a hung parliament?
This would be the only reason to choose Straw.
Will a 'don't frighten the electorate' choice work if the electorate don't care anymore?
I think Labour's problems are now so great that they must begin to reposition themselves immediately if they hope to be in a fit state to regain power after 3 Conservative terms. They will be gambling that they can govern again even before they know if they will survive.
Liz Brown
September 21st, 2008 10:56am Report this commentGod help us - the man is a lyingposturing hypocrite with a very nasty past and probably unpleasant future
Max Kaye
September 21st, 2008 5:26pm Report this commentLiz - although I agree with you - this would be the sensible choice from Labour's point of view as everyone knows that the next leader is a dead duck no matter who he/she is. Hopefully Labour will continue to act in an irrational manner.
Smeagol Straw would, of course, like to be PM even just for a couple of months - if only for the added pension and - in due course - elevation to the HoL and access to more public money.
JimBob
September 21st, 2008 5:29pm Report this commentMakes Darling look charismatic. Harman is surely a better choice for Labour
Back to top