Why did Gordon change his Iraq timetable?
Matthew d'Ancona 12:27pm
So Gordon Brown, having brought forward his trip to Iraq, says that more than 1,000 troops will be home by Christmas. Is this the same Gordon Brown who said at Camp David that no announcement on troop drawdown would be made until he delivered his Commons statement, set for next week? What encouraged the PM to break this promise and make the declaration now? Surely not the Tories' strong showing in Blackpool?



Previous






Tiberius
October 2nd, 2007 2:43pm Report this commentWell Liam Fox has just said in no uncertain terms how he views this announcment. Isn't even Brown pushing his luck with such an indisputable piece of inauthenticity?
albert hammond bootleg
October 2nd, 2007 2:47pm Report this commentthis is such a blantant attempt to dominate the front pages I almost feel embarrassed for Mr Brown, until I remember he's responsible for the gross underfunding of the military. The tories ought to make more of this.
David Lindsay
October 2nd, 2007 5:19pm Report this commentToday's announcement is of course to be welcomed. But since it is now entirely obvious that we are already embarked on a process of unconditional withdrawal, why is that process not simply changed to an event, and an immediate event at that? What are we waiting for? As for "upstaging" Cameron, are you serious? What on earth could any speech of Cameron's possibly contain that required to be "upstaged"? Brown knows that the Tories not only will not win the next General Election, but actually cannot do so, as a matter of psephological fact. So, like two Tory MPs as much as anyone else, he is treating them as the electoral and political irrelevance that they are. He is simply getting on with government as usual, as if the Tories did not exist, which they might as well not. If you don't believe this, then just ask Patrick Mercer or John Bercow. But the question remains, if there can never be another Tory Government, then why bother having a Labour Party?
Back to top