Wednesday 10 February 2010

Jobs at Telegraph

Monday, 10th November 2008

Responsibility, responsibility, responsibility

Fraser Nelson 3:16pm

You have to give David Cameron marks for trying. He’s still trying to breathe life into the word “responsibility” in hope that it can become some kind of a political battle cry. Steve Hilton literally built a business making “corporate social responsibility” into something that companies buy into – but it’s harder to do the same with politics. Every politician claims what they do is responsible, it’s not a distinguishing feature. The more Cameron uses the r-word, the more it reminds me if Brown starting every sentence “it is right that we...” Yet no new Tory idea is complete without the r-word, whether it’s the Debt Responsibility Mechanism or the Office for Budget Responsibility. And Cameron uses the word 13 times in his speech to the Women’s Organisation today. I wouldn’t mind if it were a word that was distinctly conservative, such as “empowerment”, but the R-word is rather nebulous and risks making Tory policies looks gimmicky, as if they are trying to find an agenda to fit the word and not vice versa. This is a shame because it serves to camouflage, rather than bring out, the innovative and radical ideas in Cameron’s thinking.

UPDATE: Andrew Lilico, who has written brilliantly on the Tories and tax, says over on CentreRight that the "responsibility" thing is a rhetorical trick so Osborne can "own" the issue then eventually call for "responsible tax cuts". I do hope so. And I also agree with CoffeeHouser Nick Kaplan (below) - sometimes this language stuff, though it seems tedious and nebulous to us on the right, has its purpose.

Steve Hilton sometimes gets flak for being some kind of leftie-appeasing moderniser, yet the incredible work he has done on the Tory brand has undoubtedly given the party "permission" (in politico-speak) to embark on conservative tasks such as education and welfare reform.  Plus Cameron has to choose his moment: if he were to come out with a radical new message now, would it get a fair hearing? So he's entitled to keep his powder dry. And I'm entitled to yawn, loudly, as he does so.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (24) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Hereford

November 10th, 2008 3:49pm Report this comment

"Marks for trying." The platitude of the 'all must have prizes' culture. Fraser, how far will your credulousness stretch with regards to Cameron and Osborne.

Andrew Forbes

November 10th, 2008 3:50pm Report this comment

That old dame Prudence served Gordon incredibly well, long after he'd ditched her.

If Cameron can make the word "Responsibility" belong to the Tories, then "irresponsibility" by default sticks to Labour. It's quite clever.

JR

November 10th, 2008 3:58pm Report this comment

Fraser - I agree responsibility is very weak. Oh and if they think the Office for Budget Responsibility is a good idea policy wise or presentationally I think the whole country is in real trouble.

But looking at the speech more widely today I think there are other ways this could go and where Cameroon can be genuinely radical. In response to Peter's blog entry on the speech (previous to yours) I've set a quite detailed scenario for putting really clear ground between them and Labour on welfare reform (and doing the right thing in my opinion) - it would cost a bit but given the propsect of mass unemployment I think it could be powerful politically.

Tom Freeman

November 10th, 2008 4:08pm Report this comment

I'm not sure that a hexasyllable is really the stuff of political sloganising.

Summer

November 10th, 2008 4:08pm Report this comment

Well, we could certainly do with a little bit more:-

Personal social responsibility
Corporate social responsibility
Economic responsibility
Media responsibility

Recent research showed that the 'younger generations' know a lot about their rights, and very little about their responsibilites.

And Trevor Phillips and the Black Police Association and Muslim Concil of GB, shout a lot more about their rights than their social responsibility. The latter will bring benefits for all, the former is a another step on the road to disaster for all.

Responsibility is a better word for now, empowerment can come when we mend our democracy.

TrevorsDen

November 10th, 2008 4:21pm Report this comment

I cannot believe the ways that you 'useless idiots' continue to find to belittle Cameron. What he is saying seems eminently sensible, but you witter on like an old washerwoman..
Your mate Hoskins is as bad ... quivering at the knees saying that all pales into insignificance compared to what Brown might say.

The harsh fact is that Tories are in opposition and can only propose alternatives. Brown is in government and can ruin all our 'tomorrows' to save his 'today'.

And he will - so get of your arse and start to cheer-lead for the tendency which you profess to support.

Hereford

November 10th, 2008 4:22pm Report this comment

If we want to go all linguistic, how about 'Human Priveliges' rather than 'Human Rights'. Tie that in with responsibility. You have to demonstrate that you take responsibility if you want to maintain your Human Priveliges...

Punk Economist

November 10th, 2008 4:23pm Report this comment

The R-word isn't gimmicky. It's priggish.

I should think the corporate social responsibility dept in the majority of firms is (possibly after IT) the most hated by the people who actually do the work.

TrevorsDen

November 10th, 2008 4:46pm Report this comment

Mr Nelson

A snippet from the Telegraph ...
"The Government’s response to the Calman Commission, the body set up by Labour, the Tories and the Lib Dems to consider Scotland’s constitutional future, will include moves to increase “financial responsibility and financial autonomy”. "

err ... thats the government talking about RESPONSIBILITY. Well - lets all give them marks for trying.

Andrew Forbes

November 10th, 2008 5:03pm Report this comment

It's a sad state of affairs, though, when the opposition can use the word "responsibility" as a means of differentiating it from the government. The more I think about that, the more frightened I become.

One would have hoped responsibility was a given for anyone in charge of a nation.

mac

November 10th, 2008 5:14pm Report this comment

So, our 'man with a plan' has a "Plan for a Responsible Economy". With a nod towards Tom Freeman earlier, punchy it ain't.

And anyway, it's an efficient or an effective or an expanding economy I'd like to see, not a slogan that still seems determinedly blue Labour in tone.

Nick Kaplan

November 10th, 2008 5:22pm Report this comment

“This is a shame because it serves to camouflage, rather than bring out, the innovative and radical ideas in Cameron’s thinking.”

Fraser the only reason Cameron has gotten away with having an education and welfare policy more right-wing then anything even Thatcher or Howard considered is precisely because it’s so well camouflaged that the BBC haven’t got their horrible leftist claws into it yet.

Moreover surely personal responsibility is a most conservative or concepts. I just wish Politicians would say more than just businessmen have a responsibility; so to do all citizens. People need to be responsible for their own lives and stop waiting for others and the state to bail them out! People (including bankers) need to take responsibility for their own decisions and should not expect the tax payer to pick up the pieces when risks don’t pay off. Criminals need to take responsibility for their actions and be punished accordingly. Ministers need to take responsibility for their own conduct and not come back after having to resign twice, on both occasions with significant redundancy payments!

It’s empowerment that sounds like the leftist term, I can imagine the slogan now “Empowerment through redistribution” it would be a bit like that Nazi slogan “Strength through Joy.”

Hereford; I completely agree most of the provisions in our human rights act are not right at all, they are all privileges and we should be able to withdraw them for the lazy and feckless. The sad truth is the actual rights like the right to free speech and property are all followed by several long paragraphs and get out clauses explaining why it is entirely up to the state when such rights may be withheld! How ghastly!

Tiberius

November 10th, 2008 5:26pm Report this comment

I suppose Cameron could decide to go down the road that he is regularly accused of taking - spin and no substance. But he uses a word which doesn't sound like spin, is purely descriptive, and some still aren't happy.

The English for responsibility is, er, responsibility. It's a laudable characteristic to try and push on to a nation which has been weaned off it by welfarism and sloth.

I hope Cameron can succeed in his aim.

strapworld

November 10th, 2008 5:29pm Report this comment

trevorsDen...calm down dear, you are in danger of high blood pressure! and I like you!

Cameron is lightweight. Just accept that. Would you follow him in a battle? Fraser is right. Responsibility can be turned around to the irresponsibility of the Conservatives, in promoting the EU for example, never leave yourself hostage to fortune.

Well written Mr Nelson.

Rhoda Klapp

November 10th, 2008 5:36pm Report this comment

Personal reasponsibility is the essence of conservatism. The corporate and fiscal versions are indeed things we ought to expect from any who aspire to government. Personal responsibility has been frequently missing from the output of the tories. Michael Howard had a go once, but it wasn't to last. The corollary of personal responsibility is small government. I haven't heard the tories talk that up either.

This could be a start in the right direction, but I won't be holding my breath.

J H Holloway

November 10th, 2008 5:36pm Report this comment

I disagree. If he can make it stick, Labour can be attacked as having indulged in 'irresponsible spending, taxing, borrowing, deployment of troops' etc.

Also painting the Tories as the 'responsible' party, would be a great boon in an age where spin and Gordo's ridiculous stunt-driven governance are still much in evidence.

Nicholas

November 10th, 2008 5:44pm Report this comment

Punk economist appears to be a labour troll. Is he someone prominent in economics on the BBC? The current pair I think of look both like trolls and punks.

Susan Hill

November 10th, 2008 5:50pm Report this comment

It`s feeble and most people under 40 have no idea what the word means but I suppose Responsibility is a teeny tiny bit of a nano-improvement on the dreaded 'sustainability.'

oldtimer

November 10th, 2008 6:02pm Report this comment

In his speech he referred to the broken economy (cf broken society). This is an accurate description as we are finding out. It will be difficult to mend.

I read the speech as one which sets out the framework within which Grayling and Osborne will set out the actions they believe should now be taken by government.

The responsibility test will be whether they increase the debt levels, which are a big part of the problem we are all in, or whether they are funded by belt tightening elsewhere.

Time will tell.

JONNY

November 10th, 2008 6:16pm Report this comment

Oh I don't know...
is it that awful?

Fergus Pickering

November 10th, 2008 6:28pm Report this comment

Responsibility seems a perfectly good word to me. And if the young don't use it then to hell with them. The Tories will get in on older people's votes - older people who know about responsibility. Don't wory, Frser, you'll understand when you're a bit older yourself.

Athesius the Facilitator

November 10th, 2008 6:31pm Report this comment

The problem is with you Fraser- old chap- is that you try to psychoanalyse every word or phrase. You are living in that Newspapermans Westminster bubble. Responsible. Its just a word for goodness sake.

Pete, Scotland

November 10th, 2008 7:22pm Report this comment

There is only one word I can think of to describe Cameron and Osborne at the moment.

Windbags!

Susan Hill

November 10th, 2008 10:31pm Report this comment

Fergus Pickering. I agree, responsibilty IS a perfectly good word but it is feeble when Cameron uses it as some sort of rallying cry to voters. He has no chance of getting in if he does not appeal the the 18-40 voters. Mind, he is only a child himself.

Post comment

Back to top

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

INTRODUCTIONS

WELCOME TO LOVE GENERATIONS Online dating for the over 50s An online dating site for single men and women in

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors