Sunday 8 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Wednesday, 17th October 2007

Miliband's constitutional muddle

Matthew d'Ancona 3:35pm

Glutton for punishment that I am, I watched all of the Commons European Scrutiny Committee's cross-examination of David Miliband on Tuesday (you can share my pain by going to the committee's website). Most of the press coverage has focused on the angry exchanges between the Foreign Secretary and the MPs, and particularly his justified fury at the invocation by the chairman, Michael Connarty, of the Munich agreement and Chamberlain's appeasement of Hitler. This was a deplorable allusion, and Mr Miliband had a duty as well as a right to express the strongest possible objections.

That aside, the hearings were also a fascinating - if often impenetrable - exploration of the legal ramifications of the EU Reform Treaty which Gordon Brown and his fellow heads of government will try to sign off in Lisbon. Not since Bill Clinton said that it all depends what you mean by 'is' has so much been said about a single word: in this case, 'shall', when applied to the supposedly new rights (or duties?) of national parliaments to get involved in the governance of the EU.

The session also revealed in eye-watering detail how much doubt still clings to the Government's famous 'red lines'. We know that Britain has a special right, shared with Ireland, to opt in to justice and home affairs policies. But how much do we know about the new threat of unspecified 'financial consequences' if we are judged to have caused difficulties in the passage of such proposals?

And what of the Charter of Fundamental Rights? If, as Mr Miliband says, it creates nothing and merely reasserts rights that exist in the system already, why is it needed at all, and why did the Government initially struggle to stay out of it altogether? The Foreign Office lawyers who accompanied their boss at least admitted that the full impact of the Charter will not be known until the courts get to work on it.

Not for the faint-hearted. If you want a quicker guide to just how much is at stake at Lisbon, consult Open Europe's very handy pre-summit briefing here.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (8) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

SJH

October 17th, 2007 4:56pm Report this comment

Re: Peace in Our Time- "justified fury", "deplorable allusion". I thought it in fact a deplorable reaction from the Foreign Secretary . This expression is commonly used when one is referring to anyone making a hollow claim of having secured something that was at risk. Mr Milliband's unjustified fury and your support for it leave me mystified.

Max Kaye

October 17th, 2007 6:06pm Report this comment

... and besides, Chamberlain was only selling Czheckoslovakia down the river, not his own country.

J H Holloway

October 17th, 2007 7:42pm Report this comment

The ITN report on my 3G phone told me (in Munich) this morning that Milliband was cut up about the allusion. And then it added Milliband was Jewish. In all honesty, I can't see how Jewishness is relevent in relation to Chamberlain's cack-handed diplomacy.

John Austin

October 17th, 2007 10:24pm Report this comment

Neville Chamberlain started rearming in 1938 after Munich. He did not believe there would be peace, that was just for the birds. He got us an extra year of peace, without which we'd have been much worse off than we even were in 1939.

David Lindsay

October 18th, 2007 11:39am Report this comment

What would Cameron do if Brown just said no? The referendum demand is his only policy. But what if there were nothing on which to hold a referendum?

Tim Price

October 19th, 2007 11:49am Report this comment

I should have thought Milliband's Jewish antecedence should make him more aware than others of the importance of not capitulating sovereignity to a barely elected foreign government. Be shamed by the reference, Foreign Secretary - how dare you have the arrogance to be offended!

Frank Leader

October 20th, 2007 9:35am Report this comment

David Milliband is Father and Grandfather were communists. So roll on the collectives.

John

October 22nd, 2007 1:13pm Report this comment

I think that Matthew's unswerving support for David Miliband might have something to do with his (Matthew's) wife's job.

Post comment

Back to top

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors