Maude responds
Peter Hoskin 4:16pm
Here are Francis Maude's answers to the questions posed by CoffeeHousers:
Sue Denim
"The Tories are ignoring their base to chase the votes of the soft centre-left. Discuss."
I don’t really know what this means. We have to be a national party, generous in outlook and broad in appeal. I’ve always thought that most people’s instincts and preferences are in line with ours: for social responsibility rather than central state control; believing that there is such a thing as society but that it’s not the same thing as the state. We’ve never believed that everything can be left to the market or that individual responsibility is all. We know that there are deep-seated social problems that require pro-active intervention – for example getting people who’ve been out of the labour market back into work, or reducing crime by getting ex-prisoners back into the mainstream rather than back into prison as happens with two thirds of them currently. But these are areas where the state has failed, and we believe the answer is to mobilise voluntary and commercial organisations. In addition, we know that public spending has to be restrained. These are Conservative approaches, applied to the Britain of today and tomorrow. We hope they’ll appeal to voters across Britain, wherever they see themselves in the political spectrum.
James
"If Labour manage to win the next general election, where do you think the blame will lie?"
I’m simply not interested in apportioning blame today for something that we profoundly hope won’t happen. I’m much more interested in avoiding the occasion for it.
DM Again
"Do you accept the BBC is institutionally biased against the Tories?"
I don’t think it’s institutionally anti-Conservative. But I do think the BBC does have what even Andrew Marr called an “innate liberal bias”. And it can get very out of touch with the public, as the Russell Brand Jonathan Ross debacle illustrated.
With ITV news devoting less coverage to politics and newspaper circulations in decline the BBC’s role in delivering high quality objective news and programming is more important than ever. It must set the benchmark in good broadcasting and its mission must be to attract large audiences to quality programming. However it shouldn’t chase ratings at the expense of decency and standards.
We also need to look closely at the how the BBC is regulated. There should be a body clearly independent of the corporation that can hold it to account. We need the BBC but we also need healthy competition to boost choice and drive up quality.
David Lindsay
"Why did you sign the Maastricht Treaty?"
A question my friends often ask me! It had to be signed by Finance and Foreign ministers from each member state. When the date approached Norman Lamont, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, consulted his diary and found he had pressing business elsewhere. So he offered me the opportunity to put my footprints on the sands of history by signing as his deputy.
Seriously though, I was a member of the government, and along with all other ministers, none of whom resigned, I agreed that the opt-outs on the single currency and on the Social Chapter ensured that the most damaging parts of the Treaty could not be imposed on Britain. It didn’t seem to me that actually appending my signature to the Treaty was significantly different from voting for it in the House of Commons, as did the entire ministerial team. I signed the Treaty as the representative of the Government when I was already accepting collective responsibility for its actions as one of its members.
Gawain
"As Coffee House has highlighted, Brown is winning the propaganda war with a stream of dodgy statistics, particularly his debt figures and dubious economics. He is getting away with blue murder (pun intended). Is there anything the opposition can do to use Parliament to expose this and to hold the ONS and Brown to account?"
This weeks’s ONS figures put the Government on course to borrow a record-breaking £67 billion this year. Gordon Brown’s failure to prepare Britain means that borrowing has reached record levels before we’ve seen the worst of the downturn and before he embarks on a further borrowing binge. He has maxed out on the nation’s credit card and now he’s planning to take out another one. That is why the Conservatives have said that to clear up this mess and set Britain on a path to lasting tax cuts we need to slow the growth of government spending from 2010, and we need an Office of Budget Responsibility so that never again can a Government play havoc with the public purse.
Melissa Forward
"It is well known that you and Douglas Hurd signed the Maastricht Treaty on behalf of the UK. How would you vote in the referendum on the Lisbon Treaty that your leader has promised (subject to caveats) - for or against?"
Easy. I’ll vote No.



Previous







DavefromLuton
November 21st, 2008 4:42pm Report this commentAm I the only one tired of 'max out on the credit card' and 'splurge'?
If you are looking for 'street cred' sound bites you'll have to do much better than that. And I am a supporter!!
So drop them now!
Hereford
November 21st, 2008 4:55pm Report this commentHmm!
TGF UKIP
November 21st, 2008 5:24pm Report this commentEasy to see why the Tories are in the shit they're in.
Steve
November 21st, 2008 5:33pm Report this commentWhy so defensive about Maastricht?
Athesius the Facilitator
November 21st, 2008 6:09pm Report this commentHe didn't answer a question properly except the BBC question. And he got that answer wrong. The BBC are bias Francis and if you don't know that you must be living in a bubble.
chris
November 21st, 2008 6:30pm Report this commentIf you want to see the back of this useless government, and want the Tories to win and do better, they (the Tories) need to show, by what they say, that Brown and his cronies are incapable of telling the truth, and what they say (Labour)is all whitewash directed at saving their own skin, not the economy.
You can't blame the general public if they don't understand that Labour are a bunch of useless lying con-men, unless every time they lie there is an intellegent rebuttal which clearly shows the extent of the lies.
The number of times the media, particularly the BBC, let ministers off the hook by asking a question, getting a lie as an answer, and because they haven't a clue, let it go, is beyond belief.
So Tories should push for maximum media exposure, and know what they are talking about.
That's all. No need for soundbytes. The public are not stupid, just uninformed, and will spot bullshit by switching off.
Hysteria
November 21st, 2008 9:20pm Report this commentdon't like "splurge" - not a proper word.
But isn't the credit card analogy pretty good? It is something most people can identify with - borrowing against future income, paying the minimum leads to additional all-up costs, switching to a new card to pay off the old one is not sustainable etc etc
Nicholas
November 22nd, 2008 10:47am Report this comment"The public are not stupid, just uninformed"
Really? I think three terms of New Labour and possibly a fourth may give the lie to your faith in the level of public intelligence.
Back to top