Is the cat slowly creeping out of the bag?
Peter Hoskin 12:18pm
I know, I know; all the election speculation's starting to get tiresome - if it wasn't already tiresome weeks ago. But it's still worth noting the comments of one of Brown's closest allies, Charlie Whelan, who's suggested that June 2009 will be an "ideal opportunity" for the PM to hold an election. His thinking is that Brown will be boosted by the world economic summit being held in London in May, and which will be attended by one President Obama. Photo-ops galore, I guess.
Whelan's proximity to Brown - he's rumoured to have been attending pre-election meetings with the Brownite inner circle, as well as having coffee with Mandy - lends his thoughts extra significance. It also undermines the idea that all this election speculation has been cooked up by CCHQ as an attempt to reawaken memories of Bottler Brown. So far, Team Brown has been tight-lipped about a 2009 election; mindful, perhaps, of the election-that-wasn't. One wonders whether they're finally starting to let the cat out the bag.



Previous






Dan
December 21st, 2008 1:28pm Report this commentA 2009 election is a certainty because Labour will be routed if they wait until 2010. Not even Brown is that stupid.
Michael Portillo reckons February 26th before the shocking economic news intensifies. I think June is more likely after Obama's visit.
Alf Tupper
December 21st, 2008 1:40pm Report this commentAt this rate, by June our leader will be ducking round the service entrance away from any cameras.
We will have gone past that point in our calamity, at which the appearance of the one who led us into it, is greeted with universal and immovable derision - Obama or no.
Gordon Musgo
December 21st, 2008 2:03pm Report this commentI'm sorry, what happened to 'nearly everyone in Westminster' as recently as yesterday? Oh, that's on page 2 now, so it's prehistorical. YOU know who is peddling these stories, yet you feed them to us as if butter wouldn't melt. Calm down, 2010 is a long time.
TrevorsDen
December 21st, 2008 2:14pm Report this commentWould any sane person really believe a word Whelan said?
Last I read Labour were on 35% or 33% take your pick.
Cogito Ergosum
December 21st, 2008 3:22pm Report this commentDo we really need full and expensive elections?
In 2005 the final results were, in statistical terms, not significantly different from the opinion polls of a month earlier.
Could we not just get some computers to produce a new list of MPs every so often by applying the poll results to each constituency?
John Moss
December 21st, 2008 3:42pm Report this commentJob losses in November and December will be formally recorded in official figures announced in January and February and will be horrendous. Brown will not want to be fighting an election against that backdrop.
Businesses going bust through Jan, Feb, March, April, May and June will mean he won't want to fight a general election in June either.
10 June 2010.
strapworld
December 21st, 2008 3:47pm Report this commentYou will note that I have said, for some time January or February 2009. It has to be February but I think they will spread it over a weekend to get maximum attendance. (30%)
Nicholas
December 21st, 2008 3:54pm Report this commentCan't you run a feature on Bob Quick's attack on the Tories instead of all this pointless GE speculation? It seems to be an unprecedented and blatant political move with the usual New Labour emotive stuff about having to move his children out of his home. Link posted at Guido's:-
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20081221/tuk-tories-undermining-leak-inquiry-6323e80.html
I'm surprised that a senior serving police officer is permitted to make public his views in this way, especially regarding a supposedly active police investigation. Does this signal the Met overtly supporting Brown in the run up to an election?
Alky Aida
December 21st, 2008 4:36pm Report this commentMy crystal ball shows the following sequence of events:
Election fever kicks off in January and reaches fever pitch at the end of the month, with opinion polls showing Labour in the lead by a couple of percent.
Not wanting to repeat the events of last Autumn, Brown decides to gamble and calls the election for mid February.
Labour are the largest party but do not hold an overall majority.
Brown's Government limps through to the autumn and collapses after a vote of no confidence.
Conservatives surge ahead and win the election in October with a mjority of 50.
Anthony
December 21st, 2008 4:59pm Report this commentThe election that never was is very different from the one that will be.
The decision on the aborted one rested on Brown's judgement. He has now lost all confidence in himself and is delegating everything to Mandelson. The election, when it comes, we be Mandy's call. Mandelson needs this election as soon as possible, because we all know what happens when Mandy's been in post too long - he has to resign.
Barring something extraordinary it must be Spring 2009.
Ian C
December 21st, 2008 5:34pm Report this commentThe election possibilities are before the Budget or after the expected tsunami of 2009 redundancies begin to reverse - i.e. not in 2009 (or 2010!). 26th February is, I am told, the possible date that the Opposition have to be ready for.
But if what the polls indicate, that the wide belief is that this is someone else's depression, turns out to be nearer reality then spring 2010 will be a much better time for Labour. The PBR pointed in this direction whatever you thought of its measures.
The reason Brown has a spring in his step is that he has got real players in the backroom (Mandy and Campbell) instead of his toy boys and girls. So he will have more trust in what they tell him to do. Whatever the date there is a very large gamble for him to decide upon.
For the Tories it is a case of maintaining an adequate profile so that, once again, an incumbent government simply loses the election - 1997, 1979, 1974, 1970 1964 and so on. It will be no different this time unless it does not get as bad as we all currently fear - and let's face it we don’t want it to get that bad. That makes it very difficult for the Tories also.
Andy
December 21st, 2008 5:41pm Report this commentGordon's going to find it hard to make his mind up (he isn't very decisive at the best of times, is he?) because he'll wonder should he go before the economic sh/1T really hits the fan, or should he wait for the Obamania hysteria to kick in or should he hang on until the Irish have voted the "right" way this time? Decisions, decisions ....
mitch
December 21st, 2008 5:53pm Report this commentI wouldn't bet on there being an election think the civil contingency act and an incident.We are gonna have to pry the keys from browns cold dead snot encrusted fingers.
madasafish
December 21st, 2008 6:35pm Report this commentAs the economy is going to really nosedive in March 2009, not much time left.
And I mean nosedive..as in serious trouble..Think the banks were bad? Just wait.
luke
December 21st, 2008 8:08pm Report this comment"It also undermines the idea that all this election speculation has been cooked up by CCHQ as an attempt to reawaken memories of Bottler Brown"
That's your idea! You have being saying that on this website!!?!
Labour Matters
December 21st, 2008 9:08pm Report this commentIs Coffee House and journalist an oxymoron?
There'll be no election before June, and the PM's just confirmed it.
Charlie T
December 21st, 2008 9:37pm Report this commentNice to see an "ex" communist class warrior owning 2 houses.
I guess in Browns moral Britain party functionaries trump hard working families everytime out
Pete Hoskin
December 21st, 2008 10:41pm Report this commentluke: I haven't said that, and we don't all speak with one voice here on Coffee House.
For the record, I think the Tories have done what they can to stoke the speculation. But that's not the same as saying "all" the chat has come from CCHQ, as has been claimed in some quarters.
Wilhelm
December 22nd, 2008 3:02am Report this commentThe photo of Gordon Broon looking into the middle distance trying to look thoughtful.
Nah, it doesnt work, son.
Peter Wilson
December 22nd, 2008 9:03am Report this commentThe Machiavelli blog, claims that Brown can wait until September 2010 for an election rather than June as I thought, since Parliament could go into Recess and the election need not be until Parliament is due to return.
Can some else confirm this, because that is nearly 2 years away, and I don't doubt Brown will wait until the very last possible moment to go
luke
December 22nd, 2008 9:48am Report this commentApologies Pete - you are quite right, it was Frazer.
You are quite right also that it would be grossly unfair to assume you all spoke with one voice. That's one reason this site is so entertaining.
Back to top