2009: an election year
Daniel Korski 1:36pm
Next year will be an election year. Though it now looks unlikely that Gordon Brown will call a general election, both local and European elections are scheduled for June 2009. These will undoubtedly be important, as a test of both how people feel about the government’s handling of the economic crisis and their views on the Lisbon Treaty, which the Irish are likely to have voted on again.
But a number of elections held overseas next year will have a much greater impact on Britain’s security and wellbeing than any of these polls.
The most important election is that of a new Afghan president in late 2009. The poll will be the second vote for the presidency in Afghanistan's history. The first was in 2004, when Hamid Karzai won a five-year term. President Karzai, whose government relies on international funds and troops, is the only significant figure to declare his candidacy so far, and the consensus is that – despite his failings and growing unpopularity – he would be tough to beat. The big question is whether polling can take place in the southern and eastern parts of the country. If not, it may fuel the Pashtun sense of disenfranchisement that the Taliban insurgency relies on.
India will hold parliamentary elections in May 2009, which will pit Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh against Lal Krishna Advani of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Following the Mumbai attacks, the election will determine the future course of Indo-Pakistani relations and the extent to which the Kashmiri conflict may be resolved. BJP has long charged that Congress is insufficiently aggressive in combating terrorism and is more likely to ratchet up tensions with Pakistan.
Across in the Middle East there are likely to be elections in Palestine, Israel and local elections in Iraq. A Palestinian election is not currently scheduled, but President Mahmoud Abbas has said he would call for elections in 2009 if his secular Fatah movement and its Islamist rivals Hamas do not reconcile by the end of this year. With no rapprochement between the parties in sight, elections are looking increasingly likely.
A second win for Hamas – or a boycott of the polls in Gaza – would make any Middle East Peace initiative by the Obama administration exceedingly difficult. So would a win for Benjamin Netanyahu and Likud, who have opened a large lead of six parliamentary seats over Kadima, the current governing part.
Iraq’s provincial elections in October will be the battleground for a fierce power struggle among sectarian and ethnic parties that could redraw the country's political map. Major players – such as the movement of populist Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and Sunni Arab tribal groups – will be competing for the first time and are expected to make gains. The results will provide early clues on how parties will fare in parliamentary elections scheduled for 2009 – polls that will determine if Shi'ite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki retains power.
The fourth set of elections that the British government will take a keen interest in will take place in South Africa. Though ANC leader Jacob Zuma is the frontrunner to be the next South African president, his political ambitions are clouded by a corruption investigation tied to an arms scandal and his relationship with a former financial adviser who was convicted of fraud and bribery. However, the ANC leader has won praise for taking a tougher stand on Zimbabwe's crisis than former President Thabo Mbeki, who was seen as too close to Robert Mugabe. Any resolution of Zimbabwe’ situation will depend on who is elected to lead South Africa.
Finally, and closer to home, the Germans are will go to polls to pass judgment on the “grand coalition” of CDU and SPD led by Angela Merkel. Surveys show the CDU with a lead of more than 11 per cent over the SPD, and Merkel neck-and-neck with Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, the SPD candidate for the chancellorship. The first test of voter support comes on 18 January when the SPD and CDU face off in an election in Hesse. The outcome of the general election will likely determine how tough a stance Germany will take on Russia and the extent to which the German government will add more troops to the Afghan mission.
So, in 2009, Britain is going to be affected by a number of elections held across the world; as people pass judgment on their leaders, their governments and key policies. What a shame that Britons most likely won’t be able to do the same.



Previous





Chris
December 31st, 2008 3:25pm Report this comment>The outcome of the general election will likely determine how tough a stance Russia will take on Russia
???
Cogito Ergosum
December 31st, 2008 4:59pm Report this commentAt the last German Election, Frau Merkel had a majority in the polls prior to the campaign. It was the "Flat Tax" proposal which denied her a full election success.
Rich taxpayers take note: the majority of voters prefer tax rates that progressively increase.
No means no
December 31st, 2008 8:10pm Report this commentIs it in the Spectator's remit to commission a Europhile? Please, no more of this man.
The French, the Dutch and the Irish have all recently rejected attempts to take even more power away from their own governments. So, what does the Spec do? It hires someone from the fervently pro-EU "European Council On Foreign Relations" (no, me neither).
If any readers would care to see what Mr Korski's remit is, look at the link below. Please ensure that your affairs are in order first.
http://ecfr.eu/page/s/statement
strapworld
December 31st, 2008 10:11pm Report this commentNo mean no is right. Whilst I do not object to such writers - the Spec does owe us a simple explanation. This man is so far up the EU tunnel he could never do a U turn!!
Let 2009 be the year we reject the EU.
Milos Borojic
January 1st, 2009 12:20am Report this commentThis is just a joke. Mr. Korski's article is not even about Europe yet the Speccie readers cannot help but indulge their one-sided, mad-cap Euro-hatred. For G-D's sake, react to the point that there won't be an election in Britain in 2009 when there should be one rather than divert the discussion in such a pathological way.
EUSSR GO HOME
January 1st, 2009 5:16am Report this commentMilos B- many of us don't consider ourselves european, we don't want to, and we never will.
We also don't want any more deconstructionists purporting to teach us why we should be things that we aren't, and pretending that we are things that we aren't just because they say so (you see: we aren't; don't want to be; and never will be).
To those of us who think this way, no matter what Mr. Korski writes about, he does so as an enemy. If he thinks he can manage to sound like something else, he's sadly mistaken; every word he writes, every sentiment he utters gives him away. If you don't know how or why, then don't expect us to tell you.
I agree with the posters here who think it strange that the Speccie should have such a writer on-staff. I take it as part of some sort of political imperative imposed by our enemies - you've got it - the euSSR.
BTW - I don't know what that line is about european elections; but any English or British person who would even consider voting in such travesties ....!!!!
Denis Cooper
January 1st, 2009 12:31pm Report this comment"Though it now looks unlikely that Gordon Brown will call a general election, both local and European elections are scheduled for June 2009. These will undoubtedly be important, as a test of both how people feel about the government’s handling of the economic crisis and their views on the Lisbon Treaty, which the Irish are likely to have voted on again."
No, it is far more likely that the second Irish referendum will be in October, after the EU Parliament elections.
Which is the most important reason why there will be no UK general election in 2009 - Brown can not and will not risk allowing the Tories back into office before the Irish have had the opportunity to reverse their "no" to the Lisbon Treaty, and by the time that has happened it will be getting a bit too late in the year to hold a general election in the UK.
This is the consequence of the present Tory position that they would hold a British referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, but only if it had not already come into force.
If instead they said that they would give us our promised referendum anyway, irrespective of what had happened in any other EU country, then the UK general election would be decoupled from the second referendum in Ireland.
Verity
January 1st, 2009 2:29pm Report this commentVery interesting thinking, Denis Cooper.
Back to top