A relationship on the wane?
Peter Hoskin 8:56am
A typically insightful piece by Rachel Sylvester today; this time on the Obama administration's precarious commitment to the "special relationship". The key revelation is about a report doing the rounds among British defence and diplomatic officials:
"Perhaps most important of all, the military alliance between Britain and America - which has cemented the political alliance since the First World War - is beginning to crack. I am told that a report circulating at the highest level in the Ministry of Defence concludes that there are now serious doubts in Washington about the effectiveness of the British Armed Forces. Senior military figures are said to have been surprised, and shocked, by feedback that arrived in Whitehall last month. Described as 'highly sensitive', it raised questions about the worth of the UK contribution to US-led operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 'It showed that the Americans don't value us much,' one source told me. 'Britain's military ability is no longer rated as highly as we thought it was.'Now, this places extra emphasis on the British contribution to the Afghan conflict. It currently looks as though Brown will only partially meet Obama's call for more troops in the region. This could wreak further damage on the special relationship, but it could also have grave consequences for the severely undermanned mission in Afghanistan. Let's hope that any change in our Government's attitude derives from strategic considerations rather than a wholly political desire to cosy-up to the incoming US President.This is not a last gasp by the outgoing Bush administration. Robert Gates, the US Defence Secretary, who has been asked to remain in his job by Mr Obama, is one of those said to have reservations about the British military contribution."



Previous






Tim Carpenter
January 6th, 2009 9:13am Report this commentWhat do you expect after Basra? Were our Forces let down by their political leaders? That is what I suspect. A fish rots from the head, so my finger points at Blair and Brown.
John Page
January 6th, 2009 9:26am Report this commentBooker wrote about the army's Iraq failure in the Sunday Telegraph a couple of days ago.
Wilhelm
January 6th, 2009 9:34am Report this commentBritish sailors got kidnapped by Iran
What did liebour do ? NOTHING.
Paul B
January 6th, 2009 9:40am Report this commentPortillo was right then when he wrote in the Sunday Times a few ago. I will try to dig out the link.
He (Portillo) was not making a criticism of our forces as Nulab tried to intimate, rather of the poliitical leadership of our services-lions led by confused lambs.
Paul B
January 6th, 2009 9:44am Report this commentLink for Portillo article
http://www.michaelportillo.co.uk/articles/art_nipress/basra_2.htm
Bruce, UK
January 6th, 2009 9:49am Report this commentIf the rabble currently masquerading as the British Government has no respect for our armed forces then why would we expect others to do so?
As the "Scum of the Manse" sitting in Downing Street might remember "that which ye sow, so shall ye reap".
The Laughing Cavalier
January 6th, 2009 9:57am Report this commentThere's nothing wrong with HM Forces. They have, however, ben betrayd by their political masters, Brown in particular. It is he who so contemptuous of the Services and has done so much to undermine them through deliberate undefunding.
Geena
January 6th, 2009 10:15am Report this commentThe Armed Forces haven't had any proper spending for the last decade so of course they've fallen in capabilities. This is all part of the Left's abandonment of nationhood for multinationalhood where bullies that would once have been diplomatically shunned are given a stage to shine on. Look at A'jad, he waltzes into the UN and the useful idiots grovel.
True Bred Pomponian
January 6th, 2009 10:26am Report this commentIt just goes to show how important it will be for the Conservatives to ensure that they invest fully in the Armed Forces when they get in. It can easily be paid for by cutting 70,000 MoD civil servants.
Forlornehope
January 6th, 2009 10:32am Report this commentThe release of the 1978 cabinet papers showed that Britain was broke and defenceless then; it hasn't changed much then.
Matt
January 6th, 2009 10:49am Report this commentTrue Bred Pomponian- nicetry but I'm afraid that won't work. I'm ex RN and not a MOD civil serpent but, we need them. The forces have been cut to the bone- in fact, deep into the marrow.
Support jobs have been civilianised, as have many of the functions of the MOD CS, often by the same staff working for agencies and then being hired back for more money.
Just what do you suggest is cut from the CS? Given that the Forces are now stuck in a hellish cycle of train, fight, train, fight- who is going to take up the slack behind the lines?
The chaps in uniform can't do it, they are needed at the sharp end. Cutting the MOD CS would actually exacerbate the problems we already have and lead to more of the lads and lasses in uniform voting with their feet.
There is waste and inefficiency within the MOD CS, but I would suggest that all the people there could be better employed within the MOD rather than being let go.
Sadly the cuts necessary to get the Forces back on track can't really come from the MOD CS- it's a very attractive idea, but the reality is that it would only further shaft the already suffering soldiers, sailors and airmen.
Ian C
January 6th, 2009 10:49am Report this commentThis confirms that the priorities of the role of the State have become so misued under statist socialist Labour.
The State's first duty is to maintain forces that can protect the country and its interests. If that means not providing 'gay outreach managers' and the raft of other non-jobs that have exploded in the past 11 years, then thank goodness.
The screwed up minds of soft headed socialists are inexplicable. Even more so when they are voted in by those who are not like them and would agree with the order of priorities.
So there was no danger in voting Labour/Lib Dem/UKIP in 1997/01/05?
Wilhelm
January 6th, 2009 11:13am Report this commentThe fact is that the two world wars have left the British and French empires shattered, they have never recovered.
The facist left are cock a hoop.
Chuck Unsworth
January 6th, 2009 11:27am Report this commentThis is about quantity, not quality. What the Americans want/wanted was much more than we could ever hope to provide. That is because the armed forces have been shredded over the past decade. It's appalling that this has led to a huge loss of fighting capacity, destroyed our defence capability, politicised the military and inflicted immense irrecoverable damage to our national prestige. Read ARRSE if you want further clarity. The Armed Forces are sickened by this 'Goverment', as we all should be.
Wilhelm
January 6th, 2009 11:51am Report this commentFor decades Britain has kidded themselves on that they have a '' special relationship with the USA.
In America they have never ever heard of it.
Austin Barry
January 6th, 2009 12:04pm Report this commentI guess that the Americans, like many of us, lost faith in the Royal Navy after its cowardice in the face of Iranian aggression. It's hard to forget the hi-jacked, hijabbed, fag-smoking, obese Wren Faye Turney, the winsome and tearful Able Seaman Arthur Batchelor and their enervated shipmates paraded in shimmering polyester suits and clutching goodie bags. The crew of the Good Ship Venus showed more guts,imagination and energy.
Polly and Alice's mum
January 6th, 2009 12:27pm Report this commentJust another nail in the coffin of our once proud country - which has been systematically destroyed during 11 years of nu-labour.
I am ashamed to be British these days.
True Bred Pomponian
January 6th, 2009 12:37pm Report this commentMatt,
Unlike you I have worked for the MoD very recently and I can assure you that in many cases MoD activities are unnecessary and, even where the activities are needed, they take about three times the number of staff that could rationally be needed to do the job. I could never work out what the 9,000 staff at Abbey Wood all did, for example. My own function was a waste of tax payers money, incidentally, which is why I got out.
Fergus Pickering
January 6th, 2009 12:53pm Report this commentI think Obama's an asshole (is one allowed to opine that?) and no friend to Britain. We do better when there's a Republican in the White House and even better when there's a Tory at Number 10. We'll have to ait till 2014 for this. I confidently expect Obama to fall flat on his face and not be re-elected
Tankus
January 6th, 2009 1:03pm Report this commentWhy don't we just accept that we are no longer a world player and just go Dutch
CS
January 6th, 2009 1:49pm Report this comment***Why don't we just accept that we are no longer a world player and just go Dutch***
Go Dutch? Are you advocating a cap on spending?
David Lindsay
January 6th, 2009 2:17pm Report this commentThere is no "special relationship". There never has been (and yes, that does ionclude during the War). Britain needs to learn some self-respect.
Verity
January 6th, 2009 2:18pm Report this commentOK, Matt. Then let's chop 70,000 diversity officers, Urdu translators and pretend bobbies.
Fergus Pickering - Fingers crossed. What people miss is, Obama isn't that bright. He's all show and flurry. Of course, Tony Blair isn't very bright and he is all show and flurry and he got reelected twice after failing abysmally at everything he touched.
I'm not holding my breath. But my fingers are crossed.
Juliana
January 6th, 2009 3:01pm Report this commentObama is totally uninterested in foreign affairs. Totally. He will continue to be so until whatever the next 9/11 on US Soil turns out to be.
porkbelly
January 6th, 2009 9:02pm Report this commentJuliana is absolutely right - that's why Hillary is Secretary of State. Dear Leader never would have given her a position of influence in an area he cares about. And yet I predict that foreign policy will prove Obama's undoing...while he is busily formulating grandiose social re-engineering programs the storm clouds overseas will gather and darken...
Archie
January 7th, 2009 6:07am Report this commentForgive this modified repost of mine from down the street, but I feel it is germane to this thread also:
"Quite brilliant article and subsequent comments! I spend a fair bit of time in North America and it has to be said that commenters here are quite right about the negative impression that the Iraq/navy hostage fiasco had on our standing with the public over there, lord knows what the elites thought, even though I seem to remember that the commander of HMS Cornwall has quietly "moved on". Perhaps it shouldn't have been quietly?
Military coup, anyone?
Back to top