The recession-proof civil servants
Peter Hoskin 9:51amA recession is a time for belt-tightening. But, going off the the Sunday Times's cover story this morning, some leading civil servants didn't get that memo. They're engaging in exactly the same sort of snout-in-trough-ery that we normally see coming from Parliament - and all courtesy of taxpayers' money. Here's the case of David Nicholson:
"David Nicholson, the head of the NHS, claims an annual £37,600 allowance for working away from home - yet he was already working and living in London when he took the job three years ago, so did not have to relocate. Nicholson was head of NHS London, and had a flat in the centre of the city, when he was moved to his highly paid London-based post in charge of the National Health Service in 2006.According to the Department of Health resource accounts for 2007-8, he received the second-home perk on top of his £215,000 salary."
As was pointed out in Andrew Grice's Indpendent article yesterday, the "Tory cuts" attack is losing its resonance as people's views on tax 'n' spend shift during the downturn. Stories like today's can only hasten that process.



Previous






C Powell
January 11th, 2009 10:34am Report this commentThe Tories should throw stories like this (and that of the behaviour of the housing officers in Norwich) back in Labour's face, every time they try and use the "Tory cuts" line.
Matthew Parris had a good article on this in yesterday's Times too.
JimBob
January 11th, 2009 11:09am Report this commentSo thats where all the NHS money went. Like Mr Powell says, theres an awful lot more mileage in this one because of the way the economy is and because theres some many more like Nicholson. Name and shame them all please.
strapworld
January 11th, 2009 11:21am Report this commentMatthew Parris's article was excellent, but it also made the pertinent observation that David Cameron has got to raise HIS game.
No more Blair's double. He has to wake up to the fact that people, now, want gravitas and honesty. Can Cameron deliver?
mitch
January 11th, 2009 11:43am Report this commentWe need to destroy this whole rotten structure and start again.
TrevorsDen
January 11th, 2009 11:55am Report this commentCameron is not and never has been a Blair double. He is a typical middle of the road conservative. Was Willie Whitelaw a Blair Double?
The other thing people should get real about is he is not never has been and never will be perfect.
Nor has any politician, nor will they be. Nor was for instance Mrs Thatcher. She gave us the EU Single market. And of course nor will the electorate.
David Cameron is plausible and decent. But most importantly he is not Gordon Brown.
Maybe some of you lot should get that tattooed on your foreheads so you can be reminded of it every morning as you shave.
Verity
January 11th, 2009 1:03pm Report this commentMatthew Parris's article was aces and hit so many nails on the head I began to get a headache.
Cameron has lost the confidence and goodwill of large swathes of Conservatives for his Blair-Too posturing. He has made it appear that there is nothing to choose between the two parties.
I don't know whether he has it in him, but he has to get vicious. As TGI UKIP said elsewhere, Conservatives and potential Conservative voters want to see blood on the carpet.
They don't have to give away their amunition. All they have to do is destroy the Labourites. That means referring derisively to things like "communism dressed up as social justice" and similar word manipulation by Labour.
Forlornehope
January 11th, 2009 4:01pm Report this commentThis comes back to the real but unspoken fault line in British politics. It is a competition between those who work in the private sector and public sector professionals (the dustmen don't get a look in anywhere). A visit to any Labour party meeting makes it all too clear that this is a special interest group for professionals in the public sector (not a manual worker in sight). No PSP with their own interests at heart would ever vote Conservative but many do; Marx called it false consiousness. Similarly plenty of people in the private sector are conned into voting Labour. Neither party can really own up for fear of losing more votes than it gains. Tough one.
Verity
January 11th, 2009 4:17pm Report this commentThe Tories should also be constantly referring to the 3,000 new laws the Labourites have signed into law. Why did we need THREE THOUSAND NEW LAWS, for God's sake? Are there 3,000 new circumstances to legislate for? It's communist bossiness and control. This should be hammered home. The Tories should promise to delete them at a swipe.
Brown reneged on Labour's "promise" (forgive the snigger) to have a referendum on the EU Constitution - oops! forgot my NuLabspeak there - "Treaty" and Brown was such a sneaky coward, didn't want his photo taken leaving to sign it, so he sneaked in the back door and signed it later. The Labourites are liars and cheats.
This cannot be hammered home often enough.
Fergus Pickering
January 11th, 2009 7:30pm Report this commentWhat the F**K is gravitas? Did the divine Margaret have it?
alan scott
January 11th, 2009 8:16pm Report this commentAnd it is non-taxable?
Back to top