Milburn's return highlights the "big beast" conundrum
Peter Hoskin 2:20pm
Alan Milburn's return to Labour's "senior team" is another arresting punctuation mark in Gordon Brown's premiership. Sure, he may not have been brought back into the Cabinet as Peter Mandelson was. But his role as the head of a new commission looking into social mobility - which James commented upon earlier - shows that the Dear Leader is smiling down on yet another of his former enemies. The party politics are clear: bridges are being built, and New Labour is reuniting for the sake of a (still unlikely) Fourth Term.
It also highlights the "big beast" conundrum that more or less all of the parties are facing at the moment. The times call not only for experienced hands and actual government/opposition of all the available talents, but also for Obama-esque change. Of course, acting on either of these calls could undermine a party's ability to meet the other, and the strategists will be scratching their heads over what the right balance is.
One compromise may be to embrace the veterans in behind-the-scenes roles - as Brown has done with Milburn, and as David Cameron emphasised he's doing with the Tory "big beasts" on Marr this morning. In Cameron's case, the question is whether this is a compromise he's happy to stick by for good, or whether we'll see Ken Clarke drafted into the frontline at the next available opportunity. Ah well, I guess we'll find out come the end of the month...



Previous






bernerlap
January 11th, 2009 3:59pm Report this commentMilburn a 'big beast'? He has always been an intellectual and political light weight who owed his cabinet post to his origins in Labour's North east nomenklatura and slavish devotion to Tony Blair.
Ivy Eileen
January 11th, 2009 4:44pm Report this comment... or is this positioning by Milburn in anticipation of a leadership contest after the General Election ?
Also, where are all those young thrusting acolytes of the Brown credo (other than the Ballses)ready and waiting for promotion ? ...er, yes, conspicuous by their absence, so our Great Leader has to fall back on his predecessor's young acolytes.
Steve
January 11th, 2009 5:43pm Report this commentRemember this is Milburn's second comeback. He was brought back to coordinate Labour's 2005 election campaign which he royally screwed up by okaying disgusting anti-semitic posters slurring the background of Michael Howard and Oliver Letwin. He also spun the lie of Tory cuts versus Labour investment which were easily picked apart by the media, although in today's economy the Tories probably regret the charge didn't stick. Milburn did such a lousy job he announced on election night he would not be serving in Blair's cabinet. I doubt this return will be much more successful.
Verity
January 11th, 2009 5:48pm Report this commentMeanwhile, despite the discontent with his continued mimicking of NuLabour (which the Labourites themselves are abandoning)as though he thinks that's what the voters want, David Cameron has taken it upon himself to reprimand Prince Harry for using the word "Paki". He described it as "completely unacceptable" - which is the dated ZanuLab term that voters are now wise to.
This is stupid on so many levels it beggars description. First, what the hell business is it of his what Prince Harry says? He's not in any position of authority whatsoever over Harry. Who the hell cares what he thinks?
Second, and here's the best bit: isn't it rather insulting to Pakistanis to splutter that referring to their ethnicity is somehow a universal insult? How did "Paki" get engineered into being "completely unacceptable", when Brit, Ozzie, Canuck, Yank - even Froggie and Kraut - etc are deemed unnoteworthy?
Brown may have a clunking fist, but Cameron's got a clumping foot and he keeps putting it in it. The Daily Mail has thousands - as in, perhaps six or seven thousand - comments on their article describing Harry's words - most of them saying, "Oh, God - enough engineered political correctness! We hate it! We're sick of it!" The only people condemning Harry's reference are obvious Labourite voters. All others decried political correctness as manipulative and hateful.
And then up pops David Cameron in The Browngraph saying this was "completely unacceptable".
Nicholas
January 11th, 2009 5:53pm Report this commentThe circus tent just got bigger and another clown joins in the anarchic game of creating more loony tunes hoops to make the long suffering British jump through. Go away and leave us alone Brown and take your ghastly mob of incompetents with you.
"Big Beast". Ha!
Charlie T
January 11th, 2009 6:11pm Report this commentMilburn is no "big beast" he`s ponced off hard working taxpayers all his adult life. A typical specimen of the hopeless useless effete power elite.
JDR
January 11th, 2009 6:12pm Report this commentAnother indication that the return of Mandelson was a masked coup d'etat.
Verity
January 11th, 2009 6:21pm Report this commentI was astounded that those posters saw the light of day. The politically correct Labour Party, viciously racist when it suits its ambitions.
Fergus Pickering
January 11th, 2009 7:17pm Report this commentPeter, it's not a conundrum, it's a problem. This is almost, though not quite, as bad as saying that someone refutes something when all they do is deny it. You wouldn't do that, would you?
TrevorsDen
January 11th, 2009 8:12pm Report this commentMilburn just shows himself to be a festering whore
egh
January 12th, 2009 12:07am Report this commentHas Brown had a face-lift, or is it just the ever truthful camera?
Nick
January 12th, 2009 12:11am Report this commentMilburn's the Labour equivalent of that other "Geordie Messiah" Kevin Keegan. After a few years of obscurity spending time on the golf course/with the family, he makes a return to the spotlight and the fans think the good times are just around the corner. It doesn't take long before there's a falling-out with the board/Gord, and he's off again.
What are the chances of Blunkett coming back before the summer?
SW11
January 12th, 2009 3:55am Report this commentVerity. Paki is - was - an accurate description of those from Pakistan. As in Afghan, Afghanistan etc
However the PC brigade knew it had become a p*ss-take, so set out to outlaw it.
This they did successfully via prosecution a few years ago of football fans who were chanting the word at a match. The case 'established' that 'Paki' was a term of abuse.
BTW - i hear that those in inner city areas not too enthusiastic about sub-continental immigration immediately switched to using the term 'stans' as a new nickname/term of abuse.
mitch
January 12th, 2009 5:06am Report this commentStanding next to millvolt maybe!
The Laughing Cavalier
January 12th, 2009 8:40am Report this commentI do wish you would stop referrring to Brown as "The Dear Leader". That was a satirical description of Blair. Brown is not dear but deranged. He is The Dour Leader.
David Lindsay
January 12th, 2009 2:45pm Report this commentAlan Milburn is a big beast? Pull the other one!
And his little bit of news comes just after the Government’s wheeze to pay for internships for this year’s crop of new graduates.
Why? Why should they be paid twice the dole merely for having degrees? Academic education is an end in itself or it is nothing, and other things deserve at least as much respect.
Thus properly understood, there are far too many universities in this country, with far too many people at them. I certainly do not say that in order to encourage smugness at or about institutions that merely happen to be old.
As for social mobility, because there used to be hardly any, and there is now also hardly any, people allow themselves to assume that there has always been hardly any.
But there used to be an astonishing amount, particularly in the decades just after the War. And there was a reason for that. It was called grammar schools.
I’d have to check, but I rather expect that Alan Milburn went to one. Still, don’t let that put you off them.
Back to top