What Cameron should have said
12:02pmHere’s what I wish David Cameron had said when discussing social mobility with John Humphrys this morning.
The reason I’m in politics, John, is to address the problem you’ve just highlighted. Belief in social mobility is stamped in the DNA of the Conservatives – and perhaps the most scandalous failure of Labour these last ten years is the way it’s failed to covert prosperity into social cohesion. The truth is that 5.3 million people are on out-of-work benefits. Now don’t interrupt me, John, you may not think it’s relevant but this figure is never aired in public and it cuts to the core of the social mobility problem. One in seven of our working-age population are on welfare, John, and they are not breaking out of it. The economy's growing, but the welfare rolls stay the same. Job vacancies suck in 1,500 immigrants a day.
Gordon Brown’s accomplishment, if you can call it that, is to combine mass immigration with mass joblessness. The two are seldom together. But his policies have been designed to produce a grateful electorate, not pursue social justice. Or social mobility.
Next, look at sink schools. The state will next year be paying £5,750 per pupil on education, one of the highest figures in the developed world. In deprived areas, it’s even more: £9,600 per pupil in the Hackney City Academy where I visited last week. So let’s not kid ourselves that cash is the problem. The problem is that this money is being siphoned off by bureaucrats and special interest groups – the sort of people who operate hand in glove with this tawdry Labour government. Only a Conservative government can break the mould, and release to schools the money which the taxpayer sets aside for them.
And if you want social mobility, let’s look at the countries that do it best: Sweden and the Netherlands. Both spend less than we do on secondary education. But neither have sink schools. If a school is bad, no one goes to it – that’s because they have a proper school choice system, where any two teachers can set up a school without being blackballed by local authority cartels. Bureaucrats won’t open new schools if there are vacancies in bad ones, John, and that’s why social mobility has got steadily worse under the comprehensive education experiment. It’s an experiment that only the Conservatives would end. Pouring more cash into the same failed system hasn’t worked for Gordon Brown over the last ten years, and the people in these council estates can’t afford another year of his medicine. That’s why Britain needs a general election, right now.



The reason I’m in politics, John, is to address the problem you’ve just highlighted. Belief in social mobility is stamped in the DNA of the Conservatives – and perhaps the most scandalous failure of Labour these last ten years is the way it’s failed to covert prosperity into social cohesion. The truth is that
Previous



Disraeli's ghost
June 25th, 2007 12:27pm Report this commentSounds stuff but isnlt school choice a little too radical for the timid Cameroons?
Fraser Nelson
June 25th, 2007 1:44pm Report this commentNo!!! It is, in my view, the best thing about Cameron. They have an excellent school choice policy, which would do exactly the above and if they're smart enough would transform secondary education. Cameron was trying to get this across in his real interview this morning ("We want to make it easier to open new schools") but didn't convey the radical nature of what it involves. I was shouting at the radio - and ended up redoing the whole interview for him above. Mind you, the Swedish conservatives only got the policy through because the Left didnt understand it. So perhaps I should be glad that the Tories dont seem able to articulate it very well either.
Curly
June 25th, 2007 1:46pm Report this commentWhat an excellently written piece Fraser, unfortunately words like choice, and immigration, won't be found in the real Cameroony vocabulary.
hogarth zombie
June 25th, 2007 3:46pm Report this commentMake Fraser Shadow Minister for Social Mobility NOW!
pregethwr
June 25th, 2007 4:09pm Report this commentSounds like you're getting a bit bored of just reporting...
MTK
June 25th, 2007 8:14pm Report this commentWould the BBC have broadcast these reports before the Tory Grammar School falling-out?
John Moss
June 25th, 2007 8:45pm Report this commentFraser, I think the "V" word has been banned though. A mistake to my mind as our opponents are sure to accuse of trying to bring in "Vouchers by the back door", if we do not explain clearly what we are doing, which should clearly be to bring in Vouchers by the front door!
Benedict White
June 26th, 2007 1:30am Report this commentFraser excellent article, and well done for putting Conservative policy across so well and so clearly.
And yes this is Conservative policy.
BTW, thanks for the numbers on Dutch and Sweedish schools. If I go out and buy the weekly shop for twice what it cost me last week is that a good thing?
Oh dear, I feel another blog post coming on!
bgp
June 26th, 2007 10:40am Report this commentIt half conforms with Conservative education policy, but to be really consistent, that ought to read "where any two teachers can set up a school without being blackballed by local authority cartels, so long as they do not want to control who can go to their school".
Pascal
June 26th, 2007 4:05pm Report this comment"release to schools the money which the taxpayer sets aside for them" The taxpayer has money taken from him, not much choice in the matter...Is that also the new conservative thinking ?
Back to top