Harman's cunning plan could hit her own side
Fraser Nelson 3:02pm
Harriet Harman, now 3-1 favourite to be the next Labour leader, has a cunning plan to shaft the Tories. For some time now, she has been badgering Brown to outlaw MPs having second jobs. As I disclose in my News of the World column today, the PM is now warming to it because he thinks Cameron would not support it, thus allowing him to draw another of his beloved dividing lines. It would also exploit Cameron's own sensitivities about the number of his shadow cabinet with second jobs. And, of course, underline her class war credentials to Labour's selectorate.
There is, however, only one problem. By the time it would be made law, Labour will most likely be months away from opposition. About a hundred Tories would be swapping their second jobs for a ministerial income, paid on top of their MPS salary. And the people Harman's scheme would hit are the brighter Labour ex-ministers, who will be keen to line up directorships to replace their lost ministerial income. So a rearguard action is being fought against Harman. She is, of course a "flower of the aristocracy", as Alan Duncan rather wonderfully dubbed her in their debut exchange last week. She is rich enough not to need a second job. Hence the resentment of by the wisely nervous labour ministers, whose minds are turning towards pending unemployment.



Previous






Alpha Romeo Mike
January 25th, 2009 3:37pm Report this comment"brighter Labour (ex-)minister(s)" Fraser? Whats one of them then?
luke
January 25th, 2009 3:40pm Report this commentOr perhaps she just believes MPs should be full-time?
I certainly do.
Forlornehope
January 25th, 2009 3:42pm Report this commentTypical aristo trying to drive the workers out of parliament.
oldtimer
January 25th, 2009 4:02pm Report this commentWould this also apply to Members of the House of Lords - as in the bending the rules case? And when is a job not a job? Will it preclude MPs from writing or broadcasting for a fee? I can see that idea flyimg like a lead balloon.
Sounds like a lot of twaddle to me. But then we cannot discount the possibility of Brown, yet again, triangulating himself up his own backside. It seems to be a unique talent.
Rhoda Klapp
January 25th, 2009 4:16pm Report this commentThis is pathetic. I thought there was supposed to be an economic crisis, and all these people can do is squabble.
Please hoist in the simple truth that it doesn't matter how many jobs these drones have, we only have the right to expect them to do the one WE pay for properly. That is the only criterion by which they should be weighed, and boy are they found wanting.
chris
January 25th, 2009 4:22pm Report this commentHave a look at Nottingham. Unlikely that they will need to, but just imagine how and where this sorry lot of MPs would ever find alternative employment. They probably aren't that bothered, but if I were a Labour MP I'd start looking for a second (or third) job now, before the've all gone together with their seat.
I wrote to 10 and 11 Downing Street last Monday asking Brown and Darling to resign, by Friday. In my letter I wondered who would be taking up their jobs, and your blog, Fraser reminds us who this would be and probably explains why the pair of them did not respond to my request.
Nicholas
January 25th, 2009 4:32pm Report this commentIf only this risible "government" spent half as much time thinking of "cunning plans" in the best interests of all the people of this once great nation rather than in party political gerrymandering and sniping against the opposition - the opposition for goodness sake!
It really does highlight their moral, intellectual and ideological bankruptcy. Truly dire.
-50 out of 10 Gordon & Harriet, F-, go to the back of the class.
Praguetory
January 25th, 2009 4:44pm Report this commentParty before country every time.
jon dee
January 25th, 2009 4:45pm Report this commentAs long as its only MPs,its alright then.
I thought for one minute you were going to mention the House of Lords.Phew.
Fred
January 25th, 2009 4:47pm Report this commentIf she proposed a law that MPs had to have a real job for 10 years before becoming an MP, that would get my support.
Fraser Nelson
January 25th, 2009 5:10pm Report this commentAlpha, i define a bright Labour minister as anyone who COULD get a second job. Many of them could not.
Luke, I dont mind backbenchers getting a second job, it keeps them in touch with the real world. But I disagree with Shadow Cabinet members doing it, as it then becomes a third job. All their attention should be set on opposing the government.
John Miller
January 25th, 2009 5:35pm Report this commentShe's just trying to do a Blair and be all things to all men - oops sorry! - persons.
Goes down a bomb with the lefties, the rich in the Party don't care and Polly the honorary Labour Party Chairperson and fellow aristo will love it
jennywren
January 25th, 2009 6:57pm Report this commentSo many people have more than one job today that it seems very out of step to deny MP's the right.
Besides, they need to do something in the real world, otherwise they might get out of touch (no really.....)
Chuck Unsworth
January 25th, 2009 7:08pm Report this commentActually it is really absurd to make this attempt. Where does it stop - has she even thought about that? For example - define 'job'. Is that the same as part time work, the occasional paid article, the odd (in all senses) consultancy, an income from the interest of a vast fortune?
Harman always leads from the lips. Her brain and her mouth are entirely out of synch.
James J
January 25th, 2009 7:52pm Report this commentMaybe she would also like to ban anyone who has ever worked outside politics from standing as an MP.
They could design a career path.PPE followed by three years working for an MP or MEP and then
” Chartered Politician” status.
Coeur de Lion
January 25th, 2009 7:58pm Report this commentwe have suffered for years from socialist MPs who are sometime civil servants, leftie lecturers, whatever, who have never run a whelk stall with its profit and loss calculations. So let's make sure that new politicians have day jobs.
Travis Bickle
January 25th, 2009 8:05pm Report this commentLuke
I beg to differ, how much better this country would be had this meddling lot done absolutely nothing since 1997, but whilst the economy goes to hell in a handcart they still tinker for tinkering's sake. If ever the danger of senior politicians never having had the experience of earning a living in the real world is there for all to see then the NuLabour project should be held up as a shining beacon of people not understanding the implications of their actions. And still they can't stop themselves!
THX1138
January 25th, 2009 8:21pm Report this commentFraser- How touching that you think that the average Tory MP can live on a ministerial salary!
TrevorsDen
January 25th, 2009 10:19pm Report this commentLuke - the more time MPs have on their hands the worse the country performs.
We have a government - which ought to be advised by a Civil Service. Trouble is this Civil Service has gone native. Just what's been going on in the Treasury the last 11 years?
No doubt govts - not least pernicious socialist ones - would like to see MPs stuck in the Westminster bubble, without a clue about whats happening in the real world.
What is wrong Mr Luke is the 'reforms of parliament which turned it into a 9 to 5 job with an expense account on the side, to suit a vast army of lefty academics and harridan mothers -- instead of a group of real people who did things in the real world and then ran the country after 7 PM.
James
January 25th, 2009 10:54pm Report this commentWhy not outlaw all of us from having second jobs? After all a struggling worker on minimum wage who happens to work for a Govt Dept (and they do exist) who is forced to take on another job to support his/her family cannot possibly be giving their all to their primary employer, can they?
Well of course they can! This is a non-sensical argument, and one that becomes entirely moot upon entering Government when the Minister will have to devote all their time to that job, as always happens.
As you rightly point out, the only people likely to be affected by this ridiculous law are labour MPs after the next election. So I say the Tories should support this wholeheartedly and then repeal it the moment they look like losing power!
Verity
January 25th, 2009 11:06pm Report this commentPosed pic. Who's the silly moo waving at? I cannot imagine anyone waving at her first.
Is she in her kelvar gear under those clothes, or is she really that lardy?
Annabel Herriott
January 25th, 2009 11:36pm Report this comment"Let them eat cake!"
Fraser Nelson
January 25th, 2009 11:38pm Report this commentTHX1138, most of the shadow cabinet are millionaires so they'll have to eat into their capital ;)
Verity
January 26th, 2009 12:48am Report this commentTrevorsDen - Agreed. When Parliament, under Blair, went native was when it all began to unravel. Legislating bodies elsewhere in the world, and in Britain prior to Princess Tony and his charming consort, the manatee, do not keep business hours. They argue and debate and fight their corners into the night. No one turns off the lights in the US Senate at 5:30. (Well, maybe at 5:30 a.m., to let the cleaners in.)
Hawkeye
January 26th, 2009 7:55am Report this commentShe could do Cameron a great favour by proposing this as he proposed something similar for his own sahdow cabinet a few weeks back.
Cameron might even support Harman on this...
THX1138
January 26th, 2009 8:33am Report this commentFraser _If most of the shadow cabinet are millionaires they shouldn't be worrying about giving up their second jobs should they!
How many of the shadow cabinet became millionaires thanks to their own efforts? Certainly not the two W11 trustafarians Dave & George. I doubt a bit of lite wonking paid for Georges big West LDN house, more like daddies wallpaper business.
Tim Carpenter LPUK
January 26th, 2009 10:19am Report this commentHarman focusing on the second jobs of the Opposition while ignoring the performance of the Cabinet's FIRST job, which is to serve the electorate, her included.
The last thing we need is to entrench the career politician. Harman is an Enemy Within the Gates.
Lola
January 26th, 2009 10:50am Report this commentFor Heaven's sake, woman, just stop meddling.
Personally I reckon that making MP's were only able to 'work' at being MP's would limit the damage they could do. And real world experience is vital in the formation of MP's.
Verity
January 26th, 2009 2:47pm Report this commentThe first parliament in the world was the Icelandic one, called, rather charmingly, The Thingi.
It only met two or three times a year and, get this, if they thought they didn't really have enough to discuss at one of the rare upcoming sessions, they cancelled it.
Once a country gets obsessive politicians busy being politicians all day and all night, the whole thingi goes to hell in a handcart.
Back to top