Subscribe to The Spectator

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Monday, 23rd March 2009

The Lib Dems take the lead on second homes

Peter Hoskin 3:21pm

Could the second homes controversy be a chance for the Lib Dems to set themselves apart from the other parties?  They've certainly come out hard on the issue, tabling an early day motion calling for the second home allowance to be abolished for London MPs, and calling for an inquiry into MPs' expenses.  Here, courtesy of Politics Home, is the statement put out by their housing spokesman, Sarah Teather:

"It is completely unacceptable that London MPs living within commuting distance of Westminster are allowed to claim money for a second home. Thousands of Londoners travel to work in Central London every single day, so why on earth shouldn’t their MPs?  

The London second homes scandal doesn’t just damage individual MPs, it damages Parliament and our democracy.  

It’s time that Parliament cleaned up its act. A full inquiry would be welcome, but unless Labour and Conservative MPs are prepared to vote for change it will continue to be business as usual at Westminster."

Good luck to her, I say.  The current rules are clearly inadequate and need an overhaul.  Although it should be remembered that the spate of "new politics" talk which followed the Derek Conway affair - from the Lib Dems, Tories and Labour alike - soon died down, and came to practically naught.  So will things be different this time around?  Watch this space.

P.S. Paul Waugh has a great post on how Downing Street is distancing itself from all this.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (6) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Rex Burr

March 23rd, 2009 6:51pm Report this comment

Expenses are to cover out of pocket costs incurred wholly in the service of the payer of the expenses. It should not be possible to increase ones wealth from expenses as it then becomes income, and is taxable.
If an employee buys a property with expense money, then ownership of that property, and any gain or loss of equity, should revert to the payer of the expenses when the receiver of the expenses leaves that employment.
It isn’t complicated!!

Hysteria

March 23rd, 2009 10:51pm Report this comment

"It isn’t complicated"

as anyone who works for a well run compnay in the private sector will know......

Verity

March 24th, 2009 12:07am Report this comment

In the photo, he looks as though he's singing "My Way" on Karaoke Nite.

Fed Up

March 24th, 2009 2:05am Report this comment

Does anyone actually care what the Lib Dems think about anything these days??????

Oldsilverfox.

March 24th, 2009 7:38am Report this comment

I hope that it will only apply to second homes as I seem to have read somewhere that Chris Huhne owns no less than five, give or take a couple.

Ray

March 24th, 2009 8:35am Report this comment

Our MPs rather remind me of the proverbial monkey that finds his hand stuck in the jar of nuts. If he would only let go of a few nuts he could retrieve both his hand and a modest little snack as well.

However, like that greedy simian our Honourable Members just can't let go of that huge fistful of allowances that they have voted themselves, regardless of the gathering mood of public anger that threatens to engulf all their reputations.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk