PMQs live blog
Peter Hoskin 11:43amBrown's off saving the world, so it's a Harman-Hague-Cable match-up at PMQs today. Stay tuned for live coverage from 1200.
1201: You can watch proceedings here.
1207: Here's Harman. First question from Joan Ryan, wanting an assurance that the Government "will do all it can" to combat rising burglary. Harman, predictably, gives an answer in the affirmative, and reels off some policies...
1208: Cheers for Hague as he stands to the lectern. As he did a few weeks ago, he leads on the government's failure to get its business loans scheme up-and-running. Keys into the "headless chickens" attack.
1210: Harman looks flustered from the off. She slips up, claiming that the Government have helped 93 businesses - she meant to say 93,000. Attempts, unconvincingly, to bring it round to "do nothing" Tories.
1212: Hague's bringing out the jokes now - referring to Brown "unpacking his Speedos" on a Latin American beach. Follows it up by mentioning Mervyn King's intervention yesterday.
1213: If you had a drink every time Harman said "do nothing", "unprecedented" or "global crisis", you'd already have alcohol poisoning.
1215: Harman tries to attack the Tories on IHT, calling their policy "£2 billion being squandered on 3,000 poeple". Hague hits back marvelously: "I know inheritance preoccupies the niece of the Countess of Longford..."
1217: Hague gives Harman a "final opportunity" to respond to King's comments yesterday - "otherwise the public will rightly conclude that the Government is in open disagreement with the Bank of England". Harman declines the opportunity, and instead lays into the Tories and their "Millionaires' Manifesto". Pointless.
1219: Cable calls King's intervention a "very British coup d'etat", and asks how much room the government have on tax and spend.
1220: Harman avoids the question: "It was this Government which gave the Bank independence to set interest rates..."
1222: Cable calls for the VAT cut to be withdrawn. Harman responds by bashing the Tories, as a party who only care about "millionaires". It seems like the Government are going to go heavy on this attack. But will it work, given the failures of the "Tory toff" attacks last year?
1227: Technical problems are slowing me down a bit, but not much has come out of the back bench questions so far. Plenty of Labour questions teeing up attacks for Harman against the Tories. Funny to hear her bash "Tory cuts" and then answer a separate question with: "At a time when public spending is tight, we need to make sure that every penny of public money is wisely spent.".
1229: John McFall asks whether the Government will make action on unemployment a centerpiece of the G20 meeting. Harman: "everything it takes ... do nothing Tories ... etc. etc."
1231: Backbench questions on bankers' bonuses, Northern Ireland and asbestos-related illnesses.
1233: More on mortgage assistance schemes, international aid and newspaper job losses.
1236: Harman gets angry replying to a question from Justine Greening, saying that the Tories would cut £600 million from the further education budget. Hm.
1237: And that's it.
PMQs VERDICT: Hague and Cable certainly put Harman on the back foot, and she gave, for the most part, a faltering and unconvincing performance. Her stubborn refusal to answer Hague's questions about Mervyn King came across badly, but it may have been enough to divert a killing blow. Harman's reliance on a "Millionaires' Manifesto" attack is worth noting - although, overall, it was pretty forgettable stuff.



Previous






jon
March 25th, 2009 11:50am Report this commentGordon Brown is interviewed live on the wall street journal site at 12.20 gmt
http://europe.wsj.com/home-page
jaydeeaitch
March 25th, 2009 12:25pm Report this commentI thought most of the top boys in the Labour Party were millionaires themselves. Harmy is, isn't she?
David
March 25th, 2009 12:30pm Report this comment"But will it work, given the failures of the "Tory toff" attacks last year?"
There's a better chance if Tim, Fraser et al are listened to, certainly.
Grunston
March 25th, 2009 12:39pm Report this commentBrown in New York (Sky news): America can leap into this new global world order, prepare for change, stimulus, regulation, global fiscus some have had two of these, gaps in supervision, welcome this proposal, global problems require global solutions, demorphous conclusions, international approach, mine is the biggest fiscal stimulus in history based on the same impaired assets ...
There must be a phrase for this bilge ... global-de-gook?
Paul B
March 25th, 2009 1:08pm Report this commentWhat a stupid first question from Joan Ryan. Will the Government do all it can to stop rising burglary?
Harperson, errr, (scratching her fragrant head in thought) let me think about that one. We will need co-ordinated action, worldwide problem, party opposite blah blah boring blah.
Sir Graphus
March 25th, 2009 1:17pm Report this commentPMQ used to have power, because the PM had the decency to attempt to answer the question.
If the stand-in PM is allowed to answer a question about economic policy with an answer about the opposition's inheritance tax policy, then there really is no point at all in the event.
Likewise, what's the point if the PM's stand-in is a totally insubstantial figure so obviously without influence at the cabinet table. You might as well have my 9 year old son responding (and that little blighter could wipe the floor with Hague, I can tell you). You might as well make it one of the prizes on the National Lottery; stand-in for the PM at PMQs and spout certain key phrases whatever the question.
John I
March 25th, 2009 1:20pm Report this commentIt strikes me that when Harman et al adopt a "Tory cuts" line, it should be answered with a "we want to save now to spend later, she wants to spend now and we will all regret it later".
Diswiss
March 25th, 2009 1:27pm Report this commentHarper-on, as irritating as ever
and always sounding so pleased with herself.
God forbid she ever becomes leader.
Victor, NW Kent
March 25th, 2009 1:57pm Report this commentHarman's "answers" were reminiscent of a Monty Python sketch - nothing to do with the question. Mind you, I think the Two Ronnies also did this one.
Wily Trout
March 25th, 2009 2:03pm Report this commentAren't Labour 'intensely relaxed' about people getting filthy rich? They were certainly intensely relaxed about sir shred until the fisons hit the fan.
D K McGREGOR
March 25th, 2009 3:08pm Report this commentIntensely relaxed about claiming second home (bedroom) allowances too.
Liz Brown
March 25th, 2009 3:10pm Report this commentThe woman is a nightmare.........bad enough that gormless refuses to answer questions - even worse when she does. A bit rich going on abut IT tax when Labuur Ministers are theiving from the taxpayer re expenses
The Preston Park Panther
March 25th, 2009 3:23pm Report this commentYou might pass this on to Hague & Co for the next time the trots try the 'Millionaires Manifesto' gambit. By the time Nulab is finished with the currency, we'll all be millionaires. Probably multi!
Back to top