Friday 9 January 2009

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Peter Hoskin

Pete suggests


Tuesday, 13th November 2007

Who is more corrupt?

Fraser Nelson 2:46pm

Now that the European Court of Auditors has refused to sign off the EU's accounts for the 13th year in a row citing "errors of legality and regularity", I have a serious question to put to CoffeeHousers. Can anyone think of a more financially corrupt institution outside of Africa?
  

Click here for this week's magazine

Blogs: Americano | Trading Floor | Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Stephen Pollard

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink  |   Comments (14)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Tiberius

November 13th, 2007 4:07pm

Expect a post from Jack Dromey very soon.

ken from glos

November 13th, 2007 4:10pm

nope !!! Why do we all put up with it??

Max Kaye

November 13th, 2007 4:34pm

In the wake of the European Court of Auditors once again failing most areas of spending in the EU’s budget, an amusing comment from Marta Andreasen (who, some may recall, was sacked as Chief Accounting Officer for the European Commission after she refused to sign off the budget for 2001): “The Commission has more than 30,000 employees. What do they do?”.

TGF UKIP

November 13th, 2007 6:30pm

Fraser, this is a question that should really be directed to the Clarke, Gummer, Heseltine gang. Be interesting to see their answer. Incidentally, has Dave done anything dafter than to give an official Tory platform to Clarke for him to use to describe Tory policy as "bonkers" to the everlasting delight of the Today programme and the Labour Party. Gordon and Humphrys quote him every time.

David Parker

November 13th, 2007 6:48pm

Its the System Folks! If the Court of Auditors ever published a positive report nobody would ever believe them. But, as "official EU Auditors" (and god help those would be whistle blowers who are not "official") their adverse report merely contributes to so called ''EU transparency.' There is, of course, no provision in any EU regulation requiring the Commission to rectify or account for the defecits` identified.

Piker

November 13th, 2007 8:30pm

Steady on there Fraser. Are you sure you meant to write "outside of Africa"? You surely meant to say "outside of America"?

Fraser Nelson

November 13th, 2007 10:21pm

Piker, if you can name an American institution so dodgy it hasnt had its books signed off in 13 years then I'm all ears...

Lee Jakeman

November 13th, 2007 11:38pm

Fraser - let me turn the question around - can YOU think of a more financially corrupt institution INSIDE of Africa?

David Davis

November 14th, 2007 12:31pm

I give 4:11 on, that the UK (or England on its own) will be the first to leave, and 11:2 that it will possibly be Poland.

EyeSee

November 14th, 2007 1:21pm

Gwyneth Dunwoody said that the Galileo project should be reviewed to see if it represented good value before proceeding, as it is going to cost at least £10 billion. This system will be paid for by taxpayers, who will then be charged to use it (through road tolls etc), thus paying for something they have already paid for, to use roads they have already paid for. The alternative is to use the American GPS system, as now, free. (Which US taxpayers generously paid for). I bet the EU somehow concludes Galileo is best value. (Free after all, doesn't give government any power).

Peter Petrelli

November 14th, 2007 1:40pm

According to some Labour MEP on Radio 4 last night the EU is not corrupt at all. More that the acceptability tests are too stringent and in any case it's the fault of national governments. Sometimes you just wonder what planet these people live on.

owen matthews

November 15th, 2007 4:31pm

if that's a serious, rather than a rhetorical question, then, yes, of course there is a more corrupt institution: the kremlin, whose senior bureaucrats run russia as a corporation for the personal benefit of them and their friends.

thomaskust

November 17th, 2007 3:11pm

Corruption, or the perception of it, is entirely a reflection of the participation level of the judging audience. The more public participation and less passive viewership there is removes the issue from being one of armchair debate and opinion to one of fact and active addressal.

Fraser Nelson

November 18th, 2007 7:12am

Owen, it was serious so thank you. I agree - the Kremlin does indeed trump the EU.

Post a comment

Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
Spectator Book Club
Blog
Spectator recommends

Golf Shop on eBay

Shoes, apparel & many more golfing goods when you search online now.


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other