The McPoison remains
Matthew d'Ancona 6:20pm
Damian McBride's departure will be spun by his successors as the honourable conduct of a man whose loose talk (or, in this case, emails) became known to the wrong people, compelling his resignation. As McBride - or "McPoison" as Peter Mandelson used to call him - heads off into the night, the Government's official line will be: "business as usual". We will be encouraged to think that this was a trivial story which spiralled out of control, forcing a back-room adviser to fall on his sword.
Don't believe a word of it (as if you would). These messages were sent from a Downing Street email address, by an adviser to HM Government whose salary you, as a taxpayer, paid until his resignation this afternoon. It is a mark of a truly corrupt regime that it ceases to understand, morally or intellectually, the distinction between party and government: for those who suffer from this delusion, the smearing of Labour's opponents is intrinsically in the public interest precisely because it is in the party interest.
And don't say they didn't warn us: in the 1997 manifesto, Tony Blair wrote that New Labour was "the political arm of none other than the British people as a whole." Patently, it was, and is, no such thing. But those words were a grim prophecy of what was to come, and how it would all end.
McBride has gone. But the mentality he personified survives in the corridors and offices of Whitehall. There are 417 days until June 3, 2010, the last possible day on which the general election can be held. It isn't over yet.
P.S. My column in tomorrow's Sunday Telegraph is all about the fall of McBride.



Previous





Mitch
April 11th, 2009 6:30pm Report this comment"It isn't over yet." but it soon will be and what a glorious feeling that is.
gordons shambolic government nears its end like some incontinent dog disgracing itself and creating a mess.
Fernando
April 11th, 2009 6:33pm Report this commentThere’s an interesting section on wilful blindness or contrived ignorance in Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willful_blindness
If you employ people like McBride and Draper can you realistically express surprise at their actions. After all what did Brown expect.
Nicholas
April 11th, 2009 6:34pm Report this comment"It is a mark of a truly corrupt regime that it ceases to understand, morally or intellectually, the distinction between party and government."
Yes, it must go - and "regime" rather than government is the operative word. On behalf of the British people HM The Queen should suspend parliament now and insist that a GE is called. If the media allow Brown to get away with this it is the equivalent of Nixon avoiding his Watergate.
David Ossitt
April 11th, 2009 6:51pm Report this commentFernando.
"After all what did Brown expect"
Simple really; just what he got!
Paul Round
April 11th, 2009 7:14pm Report this commentOn reading your headline "McPoison",I assumed you were referring to Brown!
Obnoxio The Clown
April 11th, 2009 7:20pm Report this commentMcBride has gone.
But not for long.
Moraymint
April 11th, 2009 7:21pm Report this commentGuys, I'm 51 years old, spent 20 years as a commissioned officer in the armed forces and, in the nicest possible sense (of course) have been around a bit.
I can't recall a time in my life when politicians and politics have been so unremittingly, dismayingly awful as they are today. How on earth did the British people invite into power such a dark, incompetent, corrupt bunch of bandits as this lot?
I'm not sure who dismays me the most: our political elite (ha!) or the uneducated, uncritical, gullible mass of British people who ever thought that the Blair/Brown/Campbell trio of creeps was ever going to lead this country to anywhere other than the gutter.
Well, here we are: a nation heading down to about as low is it gets economically, socially and politically. If the British people don't wake up soon and smell the coffee, we're stuffed.
It beggars belief that the UK could have spawned such a group of political gangsters and, moreover, let them play with the train set for so long. We're going to pay for this mess for at least a decade and, quite possibly, a generation. My only hope is that the British people will have at last learned the lesson that voting in a Labour adminstration always ends in tears. This time it will end in little short of a catastrophe.
Perhaps that's what you get when an unelected Prime Minister muscles into the job and who spent the previous 10 years working behind the scenes betraying the elected Prime Minister.
All this is worthy of Kafka.
Chuck Unsworth
April 11th, 2009 7:41pm Report this comment@ Moraymint
Amen to that, but sadly many of these civilians have little understanding of honour, integrity nor even dignity. They are mediocre scum.
Athesius the Facilitator
April 11th, 2009 8:19pm Report this commentDear Mr Moraymint-Well said, why should I write anything on this blog when you do it so well for me.
By the way I hope that was the senior service you served in and not the Pongo's or the Crabs.
Hysteria
April 11th, 2009 8:34pm Report this commentMoraymint - well said - as usual. My concern is that the folks in the CH do not represent the bulk of the public - hope I am wrong.
On a lighter note - Mrs H tells me the weather has been great up our way - hope the same is true for you over the weekend!
Guinevere
April 11th, 2009 9:22pm Report this commentOh for the days when someone might have been given a bottle of whisky and revolver - and trusted to do the honourable thing!
The current bunch will not own up to their mistakes, no matter how crass or obvious or impossible to cover up. The idea of duty, morale and decency seem to have been lost in the Government, civil service and town halls alike.
Anne Palmer
April 11th, 2009 9:40pm Report this commentIf YOU feel like that Matthew, how do you think the people feel that contribute towards their wages and their vast corruptible expences, and even then they cannot actually do the job of Governing this Country because they have given it away to foreigners to do. That is contrary to our own Constitution and it puts ALL the British people in a precarious position because if they obey foreign law they are in danger of violating their allegiance to the British Crown and also their own Government is going against the Coronation Oath Her Majesty made during Her Coronation, putting Her majesty in jeopardy also.
So where exactly does that leave us all?
Moraymint
April 11th, 2009 10:07pm Report this commentHysteria - glad to see you here - weather fine here in Moray. Spent the day building Stalag Luft III for Mrs Moraymint's hens. Allowed me to fume quietly about the state we're in, whilst catching some rays.
Ivy Eileen
April 11th, 2009 11:02pm Report this commentMoraymint - amen to everything you write.
Trouble is that over the last 12 or so years the people of this country have been so "conditioned" that anything that smacks of integrity or honesty has gone.
Charlie
April 12th, 2009 12:32am Report this commentMoraymint. This state of affairs occurs because the Labour Party no longer contains people who have done a a hard and dangerous days work in their lives. When the Labour Party contained craftsmen and those who had worked on trawlers, in the mines, shipyards, construction sites and steel works; they understood the need for decency as their lives depended on the actions of others.
TGF UKIP
April 12th, 2009 12:38am Report this commentSplendid, splendid post, Moraymint! But as to how and why they got and get away with it, step forward the Great British Media - so easily and so cheaply bought.
What we now have to look forward to is the piece of news management out of Downing Street in the next 48 hours which the BBC, Guardian, Telegraph, Times etc will ensure buries the McBride episode.
Forget the Tory jellies, Guido is our only hope.
Bentos
April 12th, 2009 8:23am Report this commentI have never felt compelled to enter debates on websites, even on ones so prestigious as The Spectator's; but the events of this weekend involving McBride has tipped me "over the edge".
As a former career civil servant at HM Treasury, I recall all too well the day in 1997 when Brown, Balls and Whelan entered the building for the first time. To my horror, many of my colleagues congregated at the front door of HMT to welcome the triumvirate almost as conquering heroes. Worryingly, this seemed not to be an extension of the tradition at No10, where staff "clap in" a new Prime Minister (but only in the event of their having won a General Election); this clearly had political undertones.
And as time progressed, their power seemed ever to grow, with an expectation that Civil Servants be required to adopt a more "political" (i.e. New Lab) approach. This was amplified by the removal of the then (career Civil Servant) press officer and senior officials not seeming to have the courage to tell Brown or his henchmen that there was a line in the sand that Civil Servants should not be asked nor expected to cross. (I had worked in No 10 in a junior role some years previously, where there was a clear demarcation between Government and political business and where, if we thought our work was verging on the latter, we were able to refuse to carry out such tasks WITHOUT any fear of reprimand.)
Civil Servants, whatever their personal political views, should, from the moment they step into their office, be apolitical and work for the Government of the day, in the conduct ONLY of Government business.
Sadly, the Government has, since 1997, and to their eternal shame, undermined this , culminating in McBride - a CIVIL SERVANT - working essentially as a political special adviser and bringing the Civil Service into disrepute.
It is about time that the Head of the Civil Service, and senior Civil Servants in Departments fought back to re-establish the fine traditions that once were the hallmark of what was perhaps the finest Civil Service in the world and one that I was proud to work for.
The Laughing Cavalier
April 12th, 2009 8:28am Report this commentThe most laughable aspect now that he is gone is the attempt to spin matters so as to give the impression he "did the honourable thing" by resigning. But there is no honour amongst these people. He was sacked, not because he did wrong in the eye of his Master, but because he got caught.
Moraymint
April 12th, 2009 10:26am Report this commentBentos. Superb. I have been wondering for about a decade if HM Civil Service had indeed been destroyed by the political gangsters we've seen in office since 1997. Your post gives me some comfort that there may be hope yet. But only if a critical mass of senior civil servants take a stand and add to the pressure to get this most corrupt of British Governments out of office now (I hope a few of them are reading this and have the courage to move).
Philip
April 12th, 2009 11:19am Report this commentWhat gets to me is the heavily biast pro government stance of selected Journo's Marr,Boulton,White,Robinson.Peston etc who have all sold their souls for a scoop at the altar of Nu Labour.
If anything good has come out of this week's revelations its that unfettered blogging by the masses, in all its opinions and uncomfortable verbiage has exposed the MSM for what it really is a prostitute posing as a virgin.
bernado
April 12th, 2009 11:43am Report this commentkakistocracy (kak•is•toc•ra•cy) n.
Government by the least qualified or most unprincipled citizens.
TGF UKIP
April 12th, 2009 2:31pm Report this commentBentos, no chance! O'Donnell is entirely political and has been a very willing accomplice of the Labour Party in government for the past twelve years.
Any future government, other than a Labour one, is going to have a major problem with internal sabotage from Labour's politicized civil service for decades to come.
Scot Richards
April 12th, 2009 3:11pm Report this commentI find the venom in these comments very un-Christian which is disappointing at this time of year. When commenting about Brown and Blair keep in mind the Easter story. And be comforted that the Lord was crucified between two thieves.
Michael
April 12th, 2009 4:12pm Report this commentWell Moraymint, you ask how did the British people elect this lot of plonkers? Because the plonkers in power after Mrs Thatcher fell from office were a complete shower. Lets not forget those five years when Major, Clarke & Heseltine were in charge.
D-503
April 12th, 2009 4:50pm Report this commentIf anyone reading this has not heard of the "Common Purpose" cult, you should make yourself familiar a.s.a.p.
Moraymint
April 12th, 2009 5:11pm Report this commentMichael, it depends how you define Major, Clarke and Heseltine as being "a complete shower". I agree that the Tory Party had run out of steam and that, like all politicians (it seems to me), they were as sleazy as any other lot you care to mention. It seems to go with the territory.
However, the extent to which the Blair/Brown ticket has run this country into the deck is without precedent in modern times. Whatever one thinks of the previous Tory administration (not a lot in my case), at least they didn't steer the nation to damn-near banana republic status.
The UK is a laughing stock internationally right now: economically, politically and socially. We're in a huge mess and the Blair/Brown duo (ably led by creeps like Alistair Campbell and other taxpayer-funded spin doctors) will leave us battered citizens with hell to pay - whilst the politicos ride off into the sunset clutching their gold-plated pensions, speaking engagements, bathplugs, porn movie subscriptions and a shed load of taxpayers' blood, sweat and hard-earned cash.
I'm no Tory apologist, but oh boy we've been good and truly shafted by this Labour administration, and some. They're nigh-on criminals; they're certainly political gangsters.
I'm glad I never voted for the b******s.
Ken
April 12th, 2009 5:22pm Report this commentTGF UKIP: Problem, what problem.
Day one of the new administration:
Fresh civil service exams for the lot. Anyone who can't jump the bar is out with no pension rights.
If such a promise were made public now, it would bring a lot of them to their senses forthwith.
Toadies.
Back to top