Breaking: Tories say that it "cannot be our priority" to reverse 50p rate
Peter Hoskin 3:05pmMore here.
More here.
Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture
Actions: Email to a friend | Permalink | Comments (7) | Subscribe
Post this entry to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
Advertisement
1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk
Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844
62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk
Apollo Magazine | Corporate | Advertising | Privacy | Terms
Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP
All Articles and Content Copyright ©2012 by The Spectator | All Rights Reserved
Mike, Brighton
April 22nd, 2009 3:20pm Report this commentWHAT!!!
The Tories should say that "all bets are off" until we see the books. Labours numbers disagree with the IMF so we cannot commit to anything let alone a 50% tax rise until we know how deep the hole is that this government has created.
Philip Hammond is an idiot
Michael Fowke
April 22nd, 2009 3:37pm Report this commentSlags, the lot of them.
chris
April 22nd, 2009 3:54pm Report this commentQuite right too. This is just a trap. The well paid will have to take it on the chin for a while. When we're in, have a commission to say whether or not it brings in any extra tax, kicking the issue into the long grass. The well paid have had a good run with these labour idiots; they know it.
Bocephus
April 22nd, 2009 4:16pm Report this commentHopefully by "not a priority to reverse" they mean it may have to wait until the afternoon of Day 1 rather than the morning.
If they don't then what's the point, they will destroy the economy every bit as much as Labour have.
TrevorsDen
April 22nd, 2009 4:46pm Report this commentMike Brighton - No its you who are the idiot.
50p is a low priority.
Quite right. It will not raise money - probably cost money and growth. There is no need to do anything until after the election.
The election is possibly 12 months away. The markets have yet to react to Darlings likely overoptimism. No need top comment until then.
Reid has just said that nobody predicted the depth of this downturn and challenges anyone to come up with a name.
I think there are a few out there.
David Lindsay
April 22nd, 2009 4:51pm Report this commentMy Right Honourable Kinsman could put to the top rate up to ninety-nine pence in the pound. Tony Blair, David Cameron, George Osborne and Nick Clegg still wouldn’t pay.
Ostentatiously high rates are beside the point. There wouldn’t be the slightest need for them if the enormously rich were not effectively exempt from tax anyway.
Ending that would bring in revenue beyond what were previously our wildest dreams. It would make it possible for the personal allowance to set permanently at national median earnings for full-time work (however much that happened to be at the given time), and for everyone to be guaranteed a minimum income of half that. And it would enable us to do these things on a flat rate of income with no further exemptions.
Just as there would still have to be child benefit payable to the mother (or the father in her complete absence), so there would still have to be the restored tax allowance for the father (or the mother in his complete absence). But apart from that, one Social Security payment, called and delivering Social Security, and bringing everyone up to half median earnings for full-time work. And one tax allowance, of twice Social Security, i.e., of median earnings for full-time work.
Carol
April 22nd, 2009 5:56pm Report this commentMike - Do you think a new government should come in and the first thing it does is reverse the 50p tax rate? There are more important measures that Osbourne needs to address immediately. The country is heading for bankruptcy and the pips are being squeaked, not just for the mega earners. The Tories are instinctively low taxers anyway - they will do it when the time is right, but it's not 'the priority.'
Back to top