Friday 5 December 2008

 

The latest culture as recommended by our staff

Michael Henderson

Michael Henderson suggests


Friday, 16th November 2007

Who is Clegg closer to?

James Forsyth 8:40am

Nick Clegg’s interview with the New Statesman is well worth reading for an insight into how he sees relations with the two main parties. Clegg describes himself as “an anti-Labour northern MP” and explains why he thinks that the Lib Dems' room for growth comes from taking seats from Labour:

"Something like 85 per cent of our MPs are in former Conservative seats. I want to hold on to those gains and improve on them. Look at the political map of Britain: the places where we are going to win the most seats in the next few years are in the Labour heartlands. One of the reasons I'm keen to be leader is that I think I can lead the charge against Labour."
Yet, Clegg is aware of the dangers of being labelled a closet Tory. So he stresses that he has no plans to do a deal with the Tories if Gordon Brown loses his overall majority:
"It's an unbelievably far-fetched attitude from senior Conservatives that somehow the Liberal Democrats are condemned to do deals with them. It's phooey."
But the essential dilemma for the Lib Dems is that they will only get into government as a minority partner. So, however, robust Clegg is now in his views of Labour and the Conservatives he will have to decide who he wants to do business with at some point.

Click here for this week's magazine

Blogs: Americano | Trading Floor | Clive Davis | Melanie Phillips | Stephen Pollard

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink  |   Comments (2)

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments

Lee Jakeman

November 16th, 2007 9:21am

There's a certain amount of sense in this. The party that started out as the champion of the British working class has ended up as the oppressor of the English working class. There's a vacuum that needs filling. If the Tories don't fill it, someone else will. More likely the straight talking BNP than the wishy-washy Liberals.

David Lindsay

November 16th, 2007 10:18am

I think that Chris Huhne had a point on Question Time last night: hatred of the Lib Dems among Labour and the Tories in their respective heartland areas (which would account for the great majority of their respective MPs in a hung Parliament) is so visceral that they are more likely to do a deal with each other. Such arrangements are of course routine in local government; and there is currently just such a coalition at national level in Germany. Let's face it, who would be able to tell the difference politically between the present situtaion and either a New Labour-New Tory coalition, or indeed a New Tory majority government? So, although Huhne might not have meant it like this, even in the event of a hung Parliament, the Lib Dems still wouldn't matter.

Post a comment

Your comment:*

Your name:*

Your email address:*
(We won't publish this)

*Required information

Please click the button only once - your comment will not be published immediately

The Spectator Parliamentarian Awards
Spectator Book Club
The Spectator Billabong
Blog
Spectator recommends

Golf Shop on eBay

Shoes, apparel & many more golfing goods when you search online now.


Spectator classifieds

ROME CENTRE

PORTA METRONIA, ROME Standing high on the top of one of the seven hills of Rome- the Coelian- this unique

City Breaks. ROME and PARIS

ROME and PARIS: over 350 holiday rentals apartments listed: visit  www.romanreference.com  and  www.parisreference.com or call +39 0648 903612.

Jewellery. RUFFS (Estd. 1904).

Goldsmiths by Design Welcome to Ruffs!  You have found a company of Goldsmiths that specialises in the manufacture, amongst other