Howard's end nears
James Campbell 10:58am
There's just over a week to go until the Australian election and it's very hard to see John Howard winning it from here. Though there has been a slight narrowing over the course of the campaign, all polls are still showing Labor with a landslide winning percentage of the vote, 54-55%. Thanks to favourable electoral boundaries Howard’s Liberals could probably lose the popular vote by as much as 2% and still win, but they needed to be a lot closer by now.
Unfortunately everything seems to be going wrong. Last week the Reserve Bank raised interest rates for the sixth time since Howard was re-elected in 2004 with the slogan 'Keeping Interest Rates Low'. Despite the bank's explicit warning that government spending was fuelling inflation and that it would take a dim view of any increases in the same, Howard went ahead on Monday with a campaign launch which included $9.5bn in new goodies for the punters. No one seems to have been impressed - the Australian Financial Review described it as a new 'land spending record' - and it allowed Labor leader Kevin Rudd to claim the high ground at his campaign launch by promising 'only' $2.4bn in new spending.
Already fighting the charge that it is trying to buy its way back into office, the last thing government needed was an official report into its pork-barrelling before the last election. But with a week to go until polling day, the National Audit Office chose yesterday to release a report showing that in 2004 a $328m regional projects scheme had been used to shovel money to government seats against departmental advice. The report is a shocker: grants were made without paper-work - sometimes before the recipient had even applied - and over a dozen were rushed though in hour on the day the last election was called so they could be announced during the campaign.



Previous






Andriët Psarisch
November 17th, 2007 3:14am Report this commentHoward is right; Rudd has been a true professional in the run up to this election, and also has the benefit, unlike Latham, of sufficient experience and a past that has not been able to be mudraked yet. Although I agree that it will be tighter than people expect, I'll really eat my hat if Howard gets in yet again. The fact that he has not complied with one of his chief promises - id est, that of keeping intrest taxes low - has alienated many even amongst his past supporters.
Michael
November 19th, 2007 12:28am Report this commentThe key issue is industrial relations reform. WorkChoices was foisted upon an unassuming public after Howard won majority of the House and Senate and has alienated the traditionally-Labor leaning 'Howard battlers' (think Reagan Democrats) whom Howard spent 10 years courting and winning office through.
Back to top