Is Brown preparing a purge of the Labour backbenches?
Peter Hoskin 11:49am
Hm. Whom to believe? In one corner, we have a source telling the Sunday Mail that the chief whip and Downing Street enforcer, Nick Brown, has drawn up a hit-list of "lazy" (aka rebellious) Labour MPs, who could well be whacked (aka deselected) ahead of the next election. Allegedly on that list are eight of the Gurkha rebels, including Diane Abbot, Kate Hoey and Bob Marshall-Andrews. In the other corner, there's a "spokesman for Nick Brown," who denies that any such list exists.
Given the way Gordon Brown's gang of bruisers and nutcases operates, the hit-list story doesn't sound implausible. But, either way, both sides should take it as a warning. For Downing Street, it's another sign of Brown's waning authority - after Smeargate, the papers have a new appetite for tales of our Prime Minister's more paranoid and dictatorial methods, and there's a whole host of Labour folk who are willing to oblige them with good copy. While, for those currently operating against Brown, it's a reminder that he remains one of the toughest streetfighters in politics. He'll come back at them, and come back hard. Expect a bloody summer.



Previous






Peter Wilson
May 3rd, 2009 11:59am Report this commentDespite McPoison going, I see also the briefings against potential challengers continues - with the article in the NOTW about Miliband and his 'luxury jet'
The Watcher
May 3rd, 2009 12:10pm Report this commentWhat a brilliant idea! Lets de-select everyone who has opposed us and give them nothing to lose by further rebellion!
If they do this, the de-selected will either;
1. Cross the floor to the Tories/LD's/SNP.
2. Stand as an independent against the Labour candidate and either win the seat a la Bleanau Gwent, or split the vote and let the opposition claim the seat or,
3. Make Brown's life a living hell for the remainder of the parliament and constantly rebel!
They really haven't got a clue have they???
David Boothroyd
May 3rd, 2009 12:28pm Report this commentThis story is plainly wrong. For one thing, Bob Marshall-Andrews said in 2006 that he would be standing down; for another, Kate Hoey and Diane Abbott have both been reselected. For a third, the Chief Whip and the NEC don't have the power to order the deselection of MPs in the way suggested.
Denis Cooper
May 3rd, 2009 12:28pm Report this commentThis is the reality of our "representative democracy" - long before constituents get to elect their representative in the Commons, the only candidates who have a chance of winning have been pre-selected by the cabals controlling their national parties, and then selected by local party groups.
If Brown decides that X will be de-selected, then X will be de-selected; and while X may still offer himself to the electors as a candidate in competition with the official Labour candidate, his chance of being re-elected is small.
An MP should fear his constituents, but that healthy fear is almost always outweighed by his unhealthy fear of the party leadership.
Pete Hoskin
May 3rd, 2009 12:31pm Report this commentDavid Boothroyd: yes, there are inconsistencies, which is why I started the post with a question. The Mail article does point out some of them, and has Kate Hoey citing her reselection.
Still, I wouldn't be too surprised if there is some sort of hit list, and if there is some sort of punishment planned for those names on it...
William Blakes Ghost
May 3rd, 2009 12:38pm Report this commentBob Marshall-Andrews?
I thought he had already said he was standing down. It's a bit of a pointless exercise then isn't it.
But then most of what Brown does that isn't damaging to the country is pointless.......
SCot RichRDS
May 3rd, 2009 12:58pm Report this commentExcellent commentary at:
http://plonquer.blogspot.com
FYI: Hazel Blears is 4' 11" which is smaller than John Prescott
Simon
May 3rd, 2009 1:06pm Report this commentIf this happens, they will find it impossible to win any Vote of No Confidence - so bring it on!
Mark
May 3rd, 2009 1:13pm Report this commentI think you'll find that the excellent Bob Marshall-Andrews is immune from all this. I beleive he is not standing this time and, even if he were, his seat is going to be won by the Tories - he accepted defeat in 2005!
More to the point, absent block votes from Unite (aka Charlie Whelan) how on earth could Brown influence local parties?
David Ossitt
May 3rd, 2009 1:18pm Report this comment"spokesman for Nick Brown," who denies that any such list exists.
So that confirms it then!
Verity
May 3rd, 2009 1:35pm Report this commentNice, sharp piece, Pete. Thanks.
alex
May 3rd, 2009 1:45pm Report this commentMarshall andrews as in all likelihood lost his seat at the next election anyway. Good luck trying to deselect hoey or abbott: both could stand as independents and win.
paracelsus
May 3rd, 2009 2:01pm Report this commentAnd while he postures and preens, Rome continues to burn!
Is there no one who will stand up to this thug and do the decent thing for the sake of the country?
Nicholas
May 3rd, 2009 2:02pm Report this commentCurrent photographs of Brown are increasingly reminding me of Stanley Baxter in one of his more manic impressions.
strapworld
May 3rd, 2009 2:09pm Report this commentBrown is now a damp squid. IT is only the likes of you, Mr Hoskin, that continue to dish out the nonsense that he is a'bruiser'
The man is a bully-therefore a bloody coward. He lives by knifeing people in the back! getting his accolytes to do the dirty work for him -and denying he had anything to do with it if they are caught!
The man has no style whatsoever. He is an incompetent middle manager who has been seriously over promoted.
He knows he has been found out and still spews out the utter nonsense that it is everyone else but him. What a creature!
I tell you he would not last long out here in the real world.
So, He wont come back at them. Because he is finished!
Slim Jim
May 3rd, 2009 2:20pm Report this commentI wonder when there's going to be talk about another 'Brown bounce'? Or are the MSM going to continue doing what they should have done years ago and expose this political thug and bully for what he is? I like the photo - it looks like his medication has just peaked! Does the rest of the photo show him modelling a nice jacket with straps at the rear?
Moraymint
May 3rd, 2009 2:21pm Report this commentTake a look at the new Downing Street petition calling for Brown NOT to resign ... some interesting signatories LOL!
Victor, NW Kent
May 3rd, 2009 2:37pm Report this commentBob Marshall-Andrews announced some while back that he will not stand for reelection.
Nick Brown might be prepared to do the deed but his master has not the guts to provoke a further row.
It should be noted that many of the 27 rebels on the Gurkha affair have been dissenters ever since Brown moved up. They have not had the Whip withdrawn so far.
In the same period Cameron has withdrawn the Whip from two MPs.
Steve
May 3rd, 2009 2:37pm Report this commentI thought Marshall-Andrews was stepping down at the next election anyway. Have I got that wrong? If he is, it makes the story seem doubtful.
Prodicus
May 3rd, 2009 2:51pm Report this commentSlurp.
Pete Hoskin
May 3rd, 2009 3:14pm Report this commentstrapworld: calling Brown - or anyone in his gang, as I do above - a "bruiser," isn't meant to be complementary (you'll notice that I also used the word "nutcases").
Nor does it contradict anything you've written...
Vulture
May 3rd, 2009 3:15pm Report this commentClearly the Bruin bullying machine is still twitching, hence the very rapid retraction by Hazel Muppet of her article. But, like a Mafia Don who's just lost his enforcer, Bruin's threats are a diminishing asset. Another point made by my (Lib Dem) MP yesty was that Liebour leadership rules are so arcane that there is no real way that Bruin CAN be replaced until the Party conference in autumn. He expects Bruin to hang on UNLESS
a delegation of Cabinet suits led by Postman Pat and Straw man ( presumably accompanied by some men in white coats for safety) goes to see him after a total debacle in the June polls and says 'Unless you go now we quit'. I'm afraid I don't think they have the balls
(or the Balls) to do that. They'll hang on, a bunch of blinking rabbits, as the headlights of General election nemesis bears down upon them
mac
May 3rd, 2009 3:28pm Report this commentA Boothroyd denial.
There must be something worrying here, then . . .
True Bred Pomponian
May 3rd, 2009 5:03pm Report this commentBring on the no confidence vote and if there isn't quite a majority, offer to ensure that any MPs not re-elected will not get their expenses published.
jon dee
May 3rd, 2009 5:28pm Report this commentNever underestimate Brown's malevolence.
He did'nt get where he is today without practising revenge as a black art form.
Chuck Unsworth
May 3rd, 2009 5:34pm Report this comment@ David Boothroyd
What do you mean by "the Chief Whip and the NEC don't have the power to order the deselection of MPs"?
We all know that is not how things are done. It's the usual NuLab Old Boy Net. Nobody issues direct instructions do they? Wouldn't want to make things too attributable, eh?
strapworld
May 3rd, 2009 6:16pm Report this commentMr Hoskin, I accept that. I apologise.
Leave Mr. Boothroyd alone. I have taken him to be old Labouir. that means a decent person who believes in the Labour Party of Keir Hardy etc. I am sure,in his heart, he must be mortified with the present situation.
Loyalty is to be admired.
TGF UKIP
May 3rd, 2009 6:21pm Report this commentIn his current predicament what Gordon needs above all else is a cast iron causus belli to be able to mount an all out diversionary attack on the Tories.
Fortunately for him we can confidently expect one of the near-anonymous sleazy part-timers who call themselves the Shadow Cabinet to furnish him with one before too long.
Pete Hoskin
May 3rd, 2009 6:27pm Report this commentstrapworld: no need to apologise! I probably should have been clearer in my post.
Alan Douglas
May 3rd, 2009 7:26pm Report this commentSCot RichRDS
May 3rd, 2009 12:58pm, says :
"FYI: Hazel Blears is 4' 11" which is smaller than John Prescott."
Are you saying she is smaller than a chipolata ?
Alan Douglas
Dee Endisnie
May 3rd, 2009 7:36pm Report this commentTGF UKIP
You are basically doing what this fag end of a government are going to do
"Clutch at Straws"
CAROL
May 3rd, 2009 9:00pm Report this commentFor you fans of James Purnell at the Speccie, Julia Hartley Brewer has more (Iain Dale has the link) about his housing arrangements which should prompt questions about his honesty. Ironic for one supposedly clamping down on Welfare cheats.
On the other hand, is this a planted story by No 10? Who can tell these days?
Ray
May 3rd, 2009 9:52pm Report this commentGrief, that photograph is scary!
David Lindsay
May 3rd, 2009 11:42pm Report this commentThe Government Whips’ Office has a hit list of twenty MPs whom it wishes to see deselected, since that sort of thing is no longer considered any business of local parties, such as there still are in any case. Indeed, in David Miliband’s South Shields constituency, even local council candidates are chosen by his London office, three hundred miles away.
Eight names are now in the public domain: Diane Abbott (Hackney North), Kate Hoey (Vauxhall), Glenda Jackson (Hampstead), Bob Marshall-Andrews (Medway), John McDonnell (Hayes and Harlington), Marsha Singh (Bradford West), Paul Truswell (Pudsey) and Mike Wood (Batley and Spen).
The Whips appear not to know that Jackson has already been reselected, or that Marshall-Andrews has already announced his retirement. But the other six, together with the other twelve people on the hit list, should announce immediately their intention to defend their seats with or without the endorsement of the Labour Party. They would undoubtedly be successful, whereas several of them might not otherwise have been this time round.
Owen Morgan
May 4th, 2009 3:39am Report this commentIt's interesting that the odious Nick Brown still needs to communicate with the human race via a spokesman. I recall the occasion, during the foot-and-mouth disaster, when Nick Brown, as the supremely inept boss of MAFF, introduced a press conference and left his civil servants to respond to the questions.
Ben Elford
May 4th, 2009 10:46am Report this commentStrapworld: Brown is now a damp squid.
I was under the impression that dampness was the natural state of the average squid.
David Ossitt
May 4th, 2009 7:11pm Report this commentBen Elford
Strapworld meant 'squib'.
Back to top