Subscribe to The Spectator

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Monday, 11th May 2009

We don't do contrition

Peter Hoskin 9:08am

If you thought your opinion of Parliament couldn't sink any lower, then think again.  This morning's papers contain a couple of grim revelations about how MPs are responding to the expenses scandal, and they certainly fit in with the sorry pattern of denial and evasion that we've witnessed so far.  Take the email sent out by the Parliamentary Labour Party to Labour MPs, and covered in the Independent.  It hardly strikes a contrite tone, as it tells them that:

"It would be easy for the public to gain the impression from this [media] coverage that MPs are generally claiming excessively or outside the rules laid down by Parliament, which is not the case."

And then there's the "plot" to bring in a private sector company to run the expenses department, uncovered in the Times.  It all sounds promising enough on paper - why not introduce an external auditor? - until you realise that it would prevent future receipts from getting published under the Freedom of Information act.  Hm.  Convenient, that.

What's most galling about these stories is that they suggest a proper solution won't be reached.  If the public's faith in Parliament is ever to be restored, then it will require an acceptance of wrongdoing on the part of the political class, along with greater transparency in future.  To be fair, David Cameron has made encouraging noises on this; especially in comparison to a morally bankrupt Gordon Brown.  But - lest the Tories forget, as they seemed to in the wake of the Derek Conway affair last year - this crisis will require more than noise to fix.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (17) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Vulture

May 11th, 2009 9:27am Report this comment

Absolutely right, Pete! There will have to be blood on the trax - and blue blood as well as red - before the public rage is assuaged. Mea culpa breast beating of the Dave variety ain't gonna be enough. It is hardly surprising that MPs are unaware of the public mood - after all, they've all spent the weekend in their second, third and fourth ( or in the case of Shaun Woodward) seventh homes.

Sally Chatterjee

May 11th, 2009 9:29am Report this comment

Cameron needs to lead. He's the de facto PM in waiting and could seize the agenda with a move to force his MPs to repay their excess or face deselection.

Forlornehope

May 11th, 2009 9:34am Report this comment

Ditch the electoral system and replace it with random selection. Problems of representation of women and minorities disappear overnight as do the costs of running elections. Introduce an elected executive, as our American cousins do and maintain a proper separation of powers. Problem solved!

Gary

May 11th, 2009 9:45am Report this comment

The FOI wheeze - just require that the external auditor is only given copies or that Fees Office are required to retain copies.(HMRC expect businesses to keep such records for up to 6 years. If that is too onerous for Parliament it should be deemed too onerous for us as well.)

The simplest answer to this is to require MPs to publish their claims on a publically available central register **when they submit them to the Fees Office**.

Detailed, specific claims that can be backed up with a receipt. Date, individual items, ammount. Submitted quarterly and only allowable to be claimed in that period. No flooding the Fees Office just before the deadline with a bulk claim hoping they won't pick over them.

That would make them do their record keeping more proficiently and cut back on the specious claims.

Publius

May 11th, 2009 9:45am Report this comment

I think The Times has it right on this. MPs should be paid a salary and they should pay tax on that salary. All of these expenses should be wiped out, and only obvious and wholly uncontroversial stuff should be claimable.

It is corrupting when those who levy tax on the rest of us basically escape paying the same tax themselves (as with Euro MPs). I mean, for God's sake, they already get subsidised food and drink in the Houses of Parliament, and have excluded themselves from the restrictions they please to impose on the rest of is (like the smoking ban).

Furthermore, being an MP is not a career and should not be viewed as such by MPs. If MPs have forgotten what public service means, and think they deserve what they could earn as XYZ in the commercial world, then let them clear out and do XYZ.

As the fine Kate Hoey said on the radio last night, if they don't like the deal, then let them leave off being MPs.

Chris Rose

May 11th, 2009 9:47am Report this comment

This is a matter which Parliament must rectify without waiting for the Government to tell it what to do. The Government derives its authority from Parliament, not the other way round. We are elect our members of Parliament; they then form a government.

Cameron and Clegg could take a lead in this, as could other senior MPs. But they must act immediately.

DL

May 11th, 2009 9:48am Report this comment

AUDITOR.

Patrick

May 11th, 2009 9:56am Report this comment

Dave should sack the stinkers from his own side and in so doing put Gord in a no win situation.

barnacle_bill

May 11th, 2009 10:17am Report this comment

Well Broon has just said sorry so thats alright.
Move along nothing to see ...

Pete Hoskin

May 11th, 2009 10:43am Report this comment

DL: Thanks for the spot. Fixed now.

Occasional Ostrich

May 11th, 2009 10:53am Report this comment

Sally Chatterjee
May 11th, 2009 9:29am

Oh, yeah, Sally; that worked when he tried to get them to give up their second jobs so that they could concentrate on preparing for government.

Bexleyite

May 11th, 2009 10:59am Report this comment

Cameron should tell his MPs to go back to their constituencies, justify their expense claims to their consituency associations and if necessary face de-selection. That would be moral leadership.

Moraymint

May 11th, 2009 11:23am Report this comment

We really must see Parliament dissolved now. Parliament is morally bankrupt and, like any company in a similar financial position, needs to be wound up.

At least we would have the psychological benefit of a fresh start.

Voters should investigate the behaviour of their own MP. If he/she has been patently abusing the expenses system, write to the constituency demanding his/her de-selection.

Call a General Election.

Any other approach to this democratic disaster is tinkering at the edges (Gordon's favourite pastime, unfortunately).

Paul B

May 11th, 2009 11:24am Report this comment

Publius @9.45. Agree with every word, especially paragraph 3 & $

Publius

May 11th, 2009 11:37am Report this comment

Ostrich. I disagree. I want MPs to have what you call second jobs. I want them to have their feet in the real world outside the Westminster hothouse. I don't mean sinecure jobs or corrupt lobbying jobs, but real activity.

Irrespective of which party is in power, what we see is a progressive loss of contact with reality.

MPs need to do less, not more. So do governments. They need to pay tax like the rest of us. They need to stand in queues like the rest of us. They need to use the goddam Tube like the rest of us. They need to put up with neighbour noise like the rest of us. They need to sit in traffic jams like the rest of us. They need to deal with the NHS like the rest of us.

Then maybe at last we'll have lower taxes, less high-handed shit from officials, a better Tube, and a bit more humility from MPs.

John Lea

May 11th, 2009 11:47am Report this comment

I hope Cameron's lack of leadership on this issue, his mealy-mouthed condemnation of 'the system', the fact that he hasn't sacked or condemned any of those exposed, will prompt people on this site to wake up and finally appreciate that Mr Cameron is not the Messiah, and that the Tories are not an alternative to New Labour but an extension of it.

Verity

May 11th, 2009 1:06pm Report this comment

Well said, John Lea!

David Cameron is not a Tory, which means he is flying under false colours, which is a despicable thing to do.

Sally Chatterjee - "Cameron needs to lead. He's the de facto PM in waiting ...". I love a good chuckle with my first cup of tea.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk