Coffee House poll: who would you nominate as Speaker to replace Michael Martin?
Peter Hoskin 6:42pmHere's a Coffee House poll (after the jump) informed by some of your responses to my post earlier. We'll keep it running until 1230 on Wednesday, before publishing the results. If you select 'Other', please do give details in the comments section.
For the record, my vote goes to Frank Field.



Previous






THX1138
May 18th, 2009 7:05pm Report this commentVerity!
Ray
May 18th, 2009 7:08pm Report this commentFrank Field is too potent a campaigner to have the fire in his belly quenched by being handed the non-political role of Speaker of the House of Commons.
David Ossitt
May 18th, 2009 7:27pm Report this commentI voted for Vince Cable but I woul be delighted if it whent to Frank Field.
Verity
May 18th, 2009 7:38pm Report this commentThe choice is poor. Ann Widdecombe would be a fine Speaker and might postpone stepping down if it were on the cards.
There shouldn't be any Labourites included. They've already pushed themselves in front of the queue when it wasn't their turn, so no more, please.
John MacLeod
May 18th, 2009 7:41pm Report this commentRichard Shepherd. Why isn't he listed here?
Humpty-Dumpty
May 18th, 2009 7:47pm Report this commentHmmm, why is Kate Hoey missing from your list of candidates?
Michael Booth
May 18th, 2009 7:48pm Report this commentHow about Noddy?
He could nod through any legislation the government of the day put before him. Oh...right...Speaker Martin did that...
Slim Jim
May 18th, 2009 7:58pm Report this commentGeorge Galloway!
Oscar
May 18th, 2009 8:19pm Report this commentHow could anyone in their right mind vote for Diane Abbott? She is a massive part of the problem and could never be part of the solution.
teledu
May 18th, 2009 8:27pm Report this commentTerry Wogan - he's had great experience of hosting a farcical, corrupt institution that is in thrall to an unelected, unrepresentative bunch of Europeans.
Baldwin
May 18th, 2009 8:30pm Report this commentI opted for Ming. He is sensible, carries authority and being a lawyer is probably helpful. Also he should keep his seat at the next election.
I agree with Ray that Frank Field is more useful elsewhere.
eeyore
May 18th, 2009 8:31pm Report this commentWiddy, your country needs you.
Jeremy
May 18th, 2009 8:32pm Report this commentDo the Tories have a man of wit, charm, tact, intelligence, erudition, integrity and honour? A man who has a love of his country and an understanding of its history? Because if so, then that man gets my vote. If he also has a knighthood and resembles, in profile, the 1st Duke of Wellington then so much the better...
Tiberius
May 18th, 2009 8:35pm Report this commentAlbus Dumbledore.
The Commons would then no longer be a Chamber of Secrets, and the wicked Gord Voldemort condemned to an existence at the fringe of civilization.
Not Quite Hayek
May 18th, 2009 8:35pm Report this commentLike Ray said, Field is needed on the benches. I chose Cormack instead. He at least seems to be measured in his responses...
Bernard from Horsham
May 18th, 2009 8:36pm Report this commentFrank Field
Andrew K
May 18th, 2009 8:36pm Report this commentI voted "other". Given the undoubted success of Betty Boothroyd, another female is called for, and convention does suggest from the governing party. It has to be Hazel Blears.
stereodog
May 18th, 2009 8:38pm Report this commentI voted for other because I'm sticking with my suggestion of John Thurso. A slightly odd choice maybe but he has experience in both Houses (being a former hereditary)and he's one of the last examples of an MP who was brought up in a family that considered public service a duty. He would be a fine alternative to the policy wonk crowd.
raptor
May 18th, 2009 8:45pm Report this commentI'd like to vote for Bercow
Yorkshire blue
May 18th, 2009 8:56pm Report this commentI see Martin Kettle has suggested Damian Green.
Liz Elliot-Pyle
May 18th, 2009 9:24pm Report this commentI voted for other, and my nomination is John Redwood.
Percy Filf
May 18th, 2009 9:24pm Report this commentMy other would be Joe Pasquale.
Well...you started it with the Diane Abbot bite.
Anyroad, look what it would do for re-connecting with the electorate.
Mark Heenan
May 18th, 2009 9:26pm Report this commentI voted "other", and would have picked Sir Alan Hazelhurst had he been on the list. Whenever he appears as deputy speaker he does a very fine job.
Matt Pain
May 18th, 2009 9:37pm Report this commentJohn MacLeod 7:41, my thoughts entirely.
I think he stood in 2000.
I don't think Frank Field would be suited to the job, although I respect him. I think Bob Marshall Andrews from the Labour side seemed principled, which is why I was surprised to see him involved in the expenses scandal. And also I think he is retiring.
John Moss
May 18th, 2009 9:48pm Report this commentAlistair Burt
Steve.W
May 18th, 2009 9:54pm Report this commentPhilip Hollobone, he's the cheapest of the lot! (Check him on Google)
Terence
May 18th, 2009 10:05pm Report this commentI would need to know which of the proposed candidates would, if elected, reinstate the wearing of the complete robes of office - including the full-bottomed wig - before making my fantasy nomination.
Quite apart from the sartorial propriety of such a move, it would be a strong indication of an intention on the part of the office-holder to subordinate his interests to those of the office and, by extension, Parliament - a disposition which appears to be sadly lacking in the current incumbent.
Chrysippus
May 18th, 2009 10:05pm Report this commentThat bloke with the wig who sits in front of the Speaker. At least, from this afternoons viewing, he seems to have a working knowledge of Parliamentary procedure.
George Laird
May 18th, 2009 10:25pm Report this commentDear All
I would suggest Charles Kennedy as the man to replace Michael Martin.
I think the choice would command support across the entire House and clear up the problem of the Speaker being either Labour or Tory.
A safe pair of hands is needed at the helm.
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
hadrian
May 18th, 2009 10:42pm Report this commentI voted for Diane...mainly because I am an afficionado of This Week and Diane is manifestly unpartisan, uninterested in personal promotion and so far as I can guage one of 'the saints' when it comes to expenses scams.
mac
May 18th, 2009 11:08pm Report this commentSir John Stanley.
TGF UKIP
May 18th, 2009 11:39pm Report this commentI'm amazed to see you haven't given Richard Shepherd, one of the Tory Party's most assiduous parliamentarians (and probably its finest orator,) a nomination but opted instead for that nauseatingly pompous prat Cormack. Could there possibly be a figure more likely to repel the public than that twit.
I'd be willing to bet too that the LibDems and plenty (secretly) on the Labour side who would happily go along with Shepherd.
Come on Pete I demand a space for Shepherd.
Verity
May 19th, 2009 12:11am Report this commentJeremy - The first Duke of Wellington! He is one of the people I would choose from history to be a guest at an imaginary dinner party.
Oscar, how could anyone contemplate Diane Abbott in the post? How indeed, except if that person were so eager to prove their multiculti credentials they could ignore the fact that she's a socialist (in other words, believes, or affects to believe, she has a right to confiscate your money and direct it to her own projects) and a hypocrite.
Nick Thompson
May 19th, 2009 12:18am Report this commentRichard Shepherd.
Believes in the institution of parliament. Believes in transparency and has a long history of fighting for freedom of speech and information. Lost the whip in attempt to defend what he saw as an assault on parliament and national interest. He has proved his independence through his criticism of both his own party and the government.
He would be a great choice.
Andrew K
May 19th, 2009 1:23am Report this commentCharles Kennedy? I'll drink to that!
Craig Strachan
May 19th, 2009 2:36am Report this commentRichard Shepherd.
burwellian
May 19th, 2009 2:52am Report this commentI agree with Verity and Eeyore; Widdecombe would make a great Speaker.
Pete Hoskin
May 19th, 2009 7:12am Report this commentTGF: Two reasons for the lack of Richard Shepherd...
When you create one of these polls, you can only have ten voting options.
And no-one had mentioned him in the comments section to my earlier thread, which I was using as a kind of nominations system.
As Humpty-Dumpty's spotted, I've also left off Kate Hoey. That was a stupid error on my part. It makes it a little less scientific, but I imagine that a significant" chunk of the votes for "Other" are for Hoey.
Roger
May 19th, 2009 8:01am Report this commentScrooge.
Archie
May 19th, 2009 8:31am Report this commentDiane Abbott? Diane Abbott?? You must be joking! As I said before; John Redwood.
Major Plonquer
May 19th, 2009 8:52am Report this commentFrank Ifield?
He hasn't done much since he had a hit with I Remember You in the 60s. But he's got a great yodel and I guess will make an excellent speaker.
Vulture
May 19th, 2009 9:04am Report this commentNorman Baker
Ian Walker
May 19th, 2009 9:48am Report this commentI voted for Diane, because if we're going to have 15-20 years of Tory rule, a genuine socialist in the chair might give the house a bit of a social conscience.
Adam Smith
May 19th, 2009 10:47am Report this commentDennis Skinner
...with George Galloway playing the pantomime horse, I hear he likes dressing up.
Thrasymachus
May 19th, 2009 11:01am Report this commentAh, sorry I'm late to the party. The choice, clearly, is an unambiguous one.
We need someone with experience, and a personality forceful enough to tear the roof off this Mother of Parliament.
Has to be George Clinton.
bob
May 19th, 2009 11:16am Report this commentkate hoey
Se1man
May 19th, 2009 12:19pm Report this commentsurallan sugar
You're fired!
DM
May 19th, 2009 1:13pm Report this commentI agree about Charles Kennedy who has politics in his blood. He's well-liked, well-respected in and out of Parliament and wasted on the back benches. Experienced, yet not of the 'old school.'
He's got to want it though, because if he's half hearted, he'll be lazy and it'll show.
Bruno Prior
May 19th, 2009 1:40pm Report this commentWhy is everyone voting for Frank Field? Do you really want to lose him from the benches? His voice is needed far more there than muted in the Speaker's chair. This isn't just a popularity contest.
Emma
May 19th, 2009 6:18pm Report this commentTo say I don't want John Bercow is an understatement. The thought of that oily toad in the chair make me feel ill. Besides I thought they were cutting down on expenses so they can't afford to build the podium he so desires.
Dirty Euro
May 19th, 2009 9:51pm Report this commentJohn Bercow or Dennis Skinner would be the best.
Why have you missed out Bercow?
He seems to be to the type who would make a good speaker. He seems to have moral values.
I think you should start the vote again with Skinner and Bercow included.
zzzz
May 19th, 2009 10:51pm Report this commentDame Sylvia Hermon
feddie.
May 20th, 2009 12:39am Report this commentKenneth Clarke would be a treat.
Vulture
May 20th, 2009 10:13am Report this commentChazza Kennedy not only has politics in the blood..he also has (hic!) other liquids too. Amiable nitwit to be sure, but a Scottish imbiber? NO thanx.
John Bercow is clearly posting under the name Dirty Euro. 'Moral values'... Perleeeeese - or are you having a larf?
Back to top