When did Brown give up on the idea of Chancellor Balls?
Peter Hoskin 5:32pm
Proverbial tumbleweeds are blowing through Westminster at the moment, as everyone waits for the European election results tonight. We'll have full coverage on Coffee House later, of course. But, if you're stuck for something to read in the meantime, I'd recommend Andrew Rawnsley's piece in the Observer. Rawnsley sets out a host of reasons why the Cabinet are wary of moving against Brown, but it's this snippet about the reshuffle which jumped out at me:
The implication seems to be that Brown was still pushing to have Balls installed as Chancellor on Friday morning. Given how a promotion for Balls could have sparked a Cabinet revolt, this was clumsy politics even before James Purnell's resignation on Thursday evening. But trying to push it through after is just deeply, deeply stupid. In the end, one of the grand ironies of the reshuffle is that Darling, by fighting against Brown, actually saved the PM from himself."Early on Thursday evening, Mr Brown attempted to bully Mr Darling into leaving the Treasury. Then and again on Friday morning, Alistair Darling pushed back and the prime minister was finally forced to abandon the idea of installing Ed Balls at Number 11."



Previous






Silent Hunter
June 7th, 2009 5:40pm Report this commentSo you don't think that Darling was simply staying on to rack up his pension pot?
Perhaps I'm being too cynical - but he is a labour politician after all.
HJ
June 7th, 2009 5:41pm Report this commentDarling has been very quiet over the weekend. I suppose you wouldn't be too eager to back a man who has been fairly openly trying to sack you. I wonder if Darling would ever speak out against Brown.
Just a thought.
Frank Middle England
June 7th, 2009 5:46pm Report this commentHow providence favours the wicked! There have been many examples throughout history...
Vulture
June 7th, 2009 5:52pm Report this commentOne way or another, this crisis is not going to end until Bruin goes. If he survives tonight's Euros and tomorrows Liebour MPs' meeting there is still Wednesday's No confidence vote and the by-elections in Norwich and Glasgow...and..and..more events, dear boy. The markets are not going to look kindly on a continuation in office of this stumbling disaster zone. Government will remain paralysed with Bruin now in hock to Darling and every other Cabinet minister. This abscess needs to be lanced, and the rush of pus will drown Liebour (hopefully) forever.
oldtimer
June 7th, 2009 5:56pm Report this commentIt was a typical dirty trick - get the others (Miliband, Johnson etc) to come out in support of Brown having said that Darling would stay - then try to shift Darling later after they had committed themselves.
This looks to me to be what happened with Flint. On Thursday night, she was offered, or thought she was offered or would get, a cabinet level job. On Friday it was not available. So she quit in a huff. This was not in the Brown script.
I liked Rawnsley`s comment on Alan Sugar:
"Giving a peerage to the gruesome Alan Sugar is the sort of frantic, misconceived stunt that is Gordon Brown at his very worst."
After seeing Sugar interviewed on Sky he came across not so much as "The Apprentice" as " I Haven`t a Clue". Rawnsley is spot on.
Lee Jakeman
June 7th, 2009 6:03pm Report this comment" In the end, one of the grand ironies of the reshuffle is that Darling, by fighting against Brown, actually saved the PM from himself." If "saved" is the right word for his current situation - given what's likely to happen next ...
Ian C
June 7th, 2009 6:07pm Report this commentIf this is right then it confirms muy long held belief that Darling will be a major element in the end of Bruin.
The Laughing Cavalier
June 7th, 2009 6:10pm Report this commentYou'd need a heart of stone not to laugh. I hope Balls does the decent thing and pays Pickfords cancellation charge.
Kalvis Jansons
June 7th, 2009 6:12pm Report this commentLet us take out Mr Brown:
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/please-go/
Cottage Pie
June 7th, 2009 6:12pm Report this commentThe fact that Yvette Cooper was taken out of the treasury shows that the scene was set for her husband to be crowned as the Chancellor. She had to move as a husband and wife team in the treasury would appear too morally corrupt even for this Government.
Susan Hill
June 7th, 2009 6:14pm Report this commentThe fact that we don`t have Ballsup for Chancellor is the only good thing to come out of the whole sorry mess.
Pete Hoskin
June 7th, 2009 6:14pm Report this commentLee Jakeman: fair point. Maybe i should have put a "temporarily" in there!
Nicholas
June 7th, 2009 6:33pm Report this commentI thought the New Labour Nuremberg-style Political Rally today and the BBC coverage of same were absolutely disgusting. There have been hundreds of complaints to the BBC about it - surprised you have not covered it yet.
mitch
June 7th, 2009 6:45pm Report this commentBrown gone by mid day mon. you saw it here first.
SteveShark
June 7th, 2009 6:52pm Report this commentChancellor Balls...is that like Tennis Elbow?
Steve.W
June 7th, 2009 6:55pm Report this commentWhen did Brown give up on the idea of Chancellor Balls?
When Lord Mandy of the very long title told him to, that's when.
Flemingcrag
June 7th, 2009 7:32pm Report this commentAndrew Rawnsley like the rest of the MSM Copywriters was so far of the scent on the Balls to replace Darling scam that he should reconsider a career in Fairy Tale writing.
This pretend to replace Darling with Balls is the most exquisite demonstration of the machaivellian art of deception being alive and prospering in recent times as we are ever likely to miss.
Alistair Darling by his exploitation of the "second homes address scam" as a means to maximise his personal profit through the avoidance of Capital Gains Tax and Stamp Duty should have been toast. Either driven from office or forced to resign.
The fact he is neither is down to his and the Prime Minister's ludicrous leak that he intended to replace Alistair with Ed (so what) Balls, the outcry from the "savvy" Media was as planned as it was predictable. They begged that this expenses fraudster be kept in charge at the Treasury.
Mission accomplished.
Andrew should visit Edinburgh more often where Alistair and his good Lady play host to Mr and Mrs Brown every other week-end.
Tankus
June 7th, 2009 7:41pm Report this commentgets the job then quits at 7pm on tuesday , or 11am on wed
killer punch
Suki
June 7th, 2009 8:00pm Report this commentThe Alan Sugar move is very silly. Just because someone is a celebrity it doesn't necessarily make them a good politician.
It's typical Brown, though. Witness his longstanding cosiness with Piers Moron. Moron spent months writing about how Brown, the new PM, was brilliant. And poor old Brown, the wee lassie from a small Scottish town who just wanted a chance to be PM has had a meltdown. Cam - beware.
badman
June 7th, 2009 8:06pm Report this commentYou mean you don't believe Gordon Brown when he said twice, on the record, in the Downing Street press conference on Friday, that he had never wanted to move Darling?
Surely he could not tell such bare faced lies? Could he?
Rush-is-Right
June 7th, 2009 8:30pm Report this comment"Labour MPs ..... may set off with the goal of putting Alan Johnson into Number 10 and wake up two months later to find that they'd installed Harriet Harman."
What a delicious prospect!
Back to top