Subscribe to The Spectator

Thursday 9 February 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Thursday, 18th June 2009

Campbell wonders at Balls' motives

James Forsyth 11:44am

This post from Alastair Campbell is fascinating and shows just how much Brown’s authority has slipped:

“I had a brief chat with Ed Balls, unaware that he had said on TV yesterday morning that his 'personal' view was that the Iraq inquiry should have been more open than the one announced by Gordon Brown. As I said here the other day, the question of whether the inquiry is private or public is not as simple and straightforward as GB's critics are making out. But what is strange is that a member of the Cabinet, and one so close to the PM, should not be supporting him, totally, one hundred per cent, at this time, on a contentious issue. He must have heard GB's arguments in the Commons.

Ed Balls has been at the front of the queue in calling for unity around GB, and was always quick to get on the phone in the days when I was in Number 10, if anyone said anything on the economy that veered from the GB view, so this seemed a very odd intervention. If it was a deliberate move related to positioning or garnering support, it is worse than that.”

Much the same thing happened towards the end of the Major government, Cabinet ministers started readying themselves for the leadership contest that they knew would follow a defeat.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (18) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Silent Hunter

June 18th, 2009 11:54am Report this comment

Sour grapes at not being made Chancellor.

Yes; Balls IS 'that' shallow.

Niccolò M

June 18th, 2009 12:16pm Report this comment

'Private enquiry' is opening gambit, designed to facilitate some general Gordon-bashing over the coming months. Whoever advised the PM that he could pursue this strategy must have known where it would lead -- true cunning at work there methinks. Poor Gordon.

chris

June 18th, 2009 12:44pm Report this comment

Bring it on. It is quite amazing to me that this useless individual thinks that he has any appeal whatsoever, to anybody. He cannot put a sentence together, he is agressive and alarming, he has showed what a pathetic minister he is, and I expect most of his so-called colleagues in his party wish he would go away.

I also expect that there are many in his party who would only be too happy to give him a big shove into the bin.

Pity, as he had a good education at one of the country's top private schools.

Only Shawn Woodward is a more hateful figure than Balls. Being a fly on the wall listening to Balls, Woodward and Mendleson would teach us a lot about nazi behaviour.
it won't be long beore Brown comes out of the bunker to shake hands with a squad of labour youths.

Simon Stephenson

June 18th, 2009 12:47pm Report this comment

Niccolò M

Thanks for pulling me back to what's really happening.

Of course! Brown's for the chop - already decided. His replacement will pick up brownie(?) points by making the inquiry public. And it won't mean anything because the inquiry's terms of reference don't allow any progress to be made, whether it's private or public.

A masterstroke. What chance a Mandelsonian inspiration, anyone?

Aidan

June 18th, 2009 12:51pm Report this comment

I can't imagine why Campbell would want the inquiry to be private.

Silent Hunter

June 18th, 2009 12:58pm Report this comment

Niccolo M:

Yes 'poor Gordon' - the man who abolished the 10p tax rate which hammered the poorest people in the country.

My heart bleeds for him.
Venal, mendacious bastard that he is.
(are we allowed to use Anglo-Saxon phraseology in The Coffee House?)

TomTom

June 18th, 2009 1:05pm Report this comment

Clearly Balls is trying to boost Yvette's chances of displacing Harriet Harridan so they can become the Dynamic Duo of Labour Lemmings Leadership

Jess The Dog

June 18th, 2009 1:19pm Report this comment

Campbell is frightened of a public inquiry, he is frightened of anything that is not an Establishment stitch up. He is frightened for very good reasons indeed, as he will be in the firing line for manipulating intelligence to use as propaganda. There is enormous evidence to back this up - including from troops on the ground and military planners without NBC kit who were not heard in Hutton.

pauline

June 18th, 2009 1:47pm Report this comment

well done balls-up u have my respect for 10 mins least u admit iraq war was farce what about baby p situ!
too many secrets there yet!!!
lets wait 5 yrs+ for that mites story

Henry Rogers

June 18th, 2009 2:19pm Report this comment

Simon S and Nic M,

I'm sure you're both right. Gordon gets forced out to screams of derision, a full scale political crisis is stage managed and the Prince of Darkness is implored to accept the reins of power by a panic stricken crowd from the Westminster Bubble.

The new PM (PM) points out that restoring confidence will require months of firm and unpopular measures and to save the public from themselves all thoughts of the June 2010 election must be abandoned.

The public won't be satisfied and the regime collapses.

The EU would naturally be obliged to intervene and impose 'Presidential Rule' and by then TB would be well placed to confirm PM as some sort of provincial governor. I'm sure a certain central european Chancellor and a President closer to home would be prepared to loan troops to bolster his administration and photos of them marching down the Mall would, by the 2090s be collector's items.

Sorry, I got a bit carried away but who is to say any of that is impossible?

Victor, NW Kent

June 18th, 2009 2:24pm Report this comment

Was there not some allegation that Alistair Campbell had caused the 45 minutes report to be amended?

Verity

June 18th, 2009 2:35pm Report this comment

Can't Alastair Campbell just go back to drinking and stop pestering us with his presence?

Pauline, in what language were you "writing", if that is not too complex a question?

Jean Baker

June 18th, 2009 2:37pm Report this comment

Odder still that media spinner and public manipulator Campbell is involved.

Any 'inquiry', secret or otherwise, will be a 'whitewash'.

Simon Stephenson

June 18th, 2009 3:48pm Report this comment

Henry Rogers : 2.19pm

Of course a next step of reasoning could be that Blair and Brown are intricately involved in all this. The "New" Labour project, perhaps designed as a relay race, with each leader in turn doing his bit. And when public disquiet reaches a certain level, the baton is switched to a new fresh face, hoodwinking the public into believing things are about to change, but in reality having exactly the same agenda as the men who have gone before him.

So all the things that a lone warrior might not have the electoral longevity to put in place, like wrecking the structure of the economy, destroying the intellectual nature of education or politicising the civil service, all become possible if the project is planned to be completed over several sequential but apparently stand-alone regimes.

Henry Rogers

June 18th, 2009 5:22pm Report this comment

Simon S,

That's all too convincing! Now we all know that TB is thick but has a wonderful gift of the gab and that GB is clever but deluded and has no gift of the gab at all. However the P of D is both clever, cunning and persuasive. He's the one to watch. And if he were to pop his clogs before his natural span I'd hope someone would be there at the graveside with a sharpened stake and a sledge hammer!

Meanwhile somewhere in some far away ministry of foreign affairs there is a group of bright young things, perhaps some of them even British, being coached to take on the handling of the P o D's already nominated successor. I doubt that's young Bollox (either of them). It will be somebody quiet and reasonable whose head is not yet above the parapet. Or perhaps one of the bright young things will be drafted in as some sort of modern equivalent of a viceroy. Us natives would have to be kept in check of course, probably by foreign mercenaries.

Fun as it is to write facetiously of such things there is the lurking thought that it might not all be paranoia and gallows humour.

Hysteria

June 18th, 2009 7:50pm Report this comment

Verity - I think pline ws ritin in txt.....

Verity

June 18th, 2009 11:18pm Report this comment

Hysteria - I no, tku.

BlairSupporter

June 19th, 2009 9:25am Report this comment

Some fun conspiratorial thoughts here.

What about this one?

Balls is only an also-ran in the darks arts business.

http://keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/the-three-musketeers-from-granita-to-desperados/

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk