Comedy Central
James Forsyth 3:43pmDaniel Finkelstein highlights this you couldn't make it up answer from Ian Austin to a question about the government's mortgage assistance scheme:
This kind of answer does make you thing that Bagehot is right about government ministers now living in their own parallel universe and so unaccountable for the accuracy of their statements.Ian Austin, the housing minister, promised MPs: "The impact of the scheme is accelerating." He said the number of families helped by the measure had risen from two to six during May.



Previous






Tiberius
June 30th, 2009 4:14pm Report this commentWell that increase clearly shows the impact of the expenses scandal.
David Boothroyd
June 30th, 2009 4:16pm Report this commentAll this demonstrates is the pathetic approach of Tory bloggers. No scheme is going to provide instant help, especially not one working in this area where complex financial negotiations are needed.
The Minister actually pointed out that 200 households had been helped under the Mortgage Rescue Scheme, and a further 295 were being assessed. The figure of 6 refers to the very final stage of a very long process.
Don't you think Government should be helping people who face repossession? Do you have any ways of speeding it up? No, you just want to jibe. Not a very adult way of looking at people in trouble.
ken from glos
June 30th, 2009 4:29pm Report this commentDont worry, BOOTHROYD will be along to defend it.!
Yarnesfromhorsham
June 30th, 2009 4:54pm Report this commentLets not forget the additional 20000 new homes. LOL
Neil McEvoy
June 30th, 2009 5:06pm Report this commentDavid Boothroyd, it would be more efficient to carpet bomb major cities with newly printed tenners.
kinglear
June 30th, 2009 5:07pm Report this commentThe weird thing is that building 20,000 new homes really WOULD be borrowing to invest, unlike the diversity co-ordinators and the like
Startled Cod
June 30th, 2009 5:07pm Report this commentDrop the Mortgage Assistance Scheme. A much better use of limited reserves would be to steal a Tory eye catching initiative - introduce a Cones Hotline. Join the campaign now. What do we want? A Cones Hotline! When do we want it? Now!
Wight Tory
June 30th, 2009 5:25pm Report this commentIncreased by 300%, that will be the line at PMQ's tomorrow I suppose
Simon Stephenson
June 30th, 2009 5:26pm Report this commentDavid Boothroyd
"Don't you think Government should be helping people who face repossession? Do you have any ways of speeding it up? No, you just want to jibe. Not a very adult way of looking at people in trouble."
Sure, if this is really what the government should be doing, but it should be being done properly.
I'm afraid you must have been to the New Labour School of Misrepresentation. You're saying "Isn't this a good thing. How can you be so heartless as to be against it?", when the point being made isn't actually anything about whether or not it's a good thing, but about Labour's crowing about the effectiveness of THEIR scheme, which has so far helped 6 families in a nation of 60 million people.
Do you see this? You're not engaging in the cut and thrust of political banter. You're misrepresenting the charge being made against you, almost certainly deliberate. But I suppose, at the bottom of it all, the sad truth is that new Labour was never any more than a bag of wind that depended on a surrounding tissue of untruths and deceptions to keep it inflated.
Got a puncture repair kit?
Swiss Bob
June 30th, 2009 5:35pm Report this commentIf you want some comedy allow this link to Gove kicking Balls in his response, something like that anyway.
Gove responds to Balls education statement today in Parliament:
Gove Gives Balls a Dose
cityboozer
June 30th, 2009 6:01pm Report this commentMr Cod
Boris has alreadt implemented a cones hotline for London. Perhaps he could sell it to other cities and the Highways Agency?
Cb.
Steve.W
June 30th, 2009 6:03pm Report this commentNeil McEvoy - Are you sure we have we got the aircraft for this?
Julianlzb87
June 30th, 2009 6:04pm Report this commentIs this the same Boothroyd?
http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:David_Boothroyd
blah blah
June 30th, 2009 6:35pm Report this commentblah blah
Private Schulz
June 30th, 2009 6:36pm Report this commentAnd here's another charming offensive by the Balls Brothers: http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2009/06/how-not-to-be-prime-ministerial-on-a-pm-visit.html
lawrence greek
June 30th, 2009 7:01pm Report this commentJulianlzb87 - certainly sounds like it. What a plum.
David Ossitt
June 30th, 2009 7:21pm Report this commentDavid Boothroyd
"Don't you think Government should be helping people who face repossession?"
No I do not; if sub-prime minds decide to borrow silly amounts of money, much more than they could ever afford, then let them pay the price and learn the lesson.
Question; are you the Boothroyd
who is the author of "United Kingdom Election Results and Politico's Guide to The History of British Political Parties, a guide to British elections since 1832"?
Ian W
June 30th, 2009 9:39pm Report this commentNo, Wight Tory, it has increased by 200% not 300%. You are not Ed Balls in disguise, are you ;-)
nujluj
June 30th, 2009 10:21pm Report this commenthttp://dizzythinks.net/2009/05/david-boothroyd-busted.html
Possibly out of date but pretty funny. Way to miss the point David- how stupid do you think we all are?
Also, Neil, will CH be implementing this 'money by air' system soon? Please get me a heads up :-)
Scot Richards
July 1st, 2009 1:21am Report this commentHere - directly quoted from Wikipedia - is a prime example of a Labour Troll dissembling for Balls:
'A Labour councillor for London's City of Westminster resigned from Wikipedia's supreme court at the weekend, after admitting he gained election to the site's ruling body using a false name.
David Boothroyd - councillor for Westminster's Westbourne ward - was elected to Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee in December 2007 under the name Sam Blacketer and has edited the overly-egalitarian online encyclopedia under at least three other names.'
Indeed. This IS the best they can do. Thieves, Liars and Cheats all. lefties should stay away from the Internet - it's not for you as your lies will all be found out.
ps; Did I really say 'dissembling for Balls'?
Rhoda Klapp
July 1st, 2009 7:44am Report this comment"No I do not; if sub-prime minds decide to borrow silly amounts of money, much more than they could ever afford, then let them pay the price and learn the lesson."
It is surely every UK resident's right to borrow other people's money to make a bet on the property market, and should they win, keep the profit, whilst having the surety of being bailed out if the bet goes wrong. Ask any flipping MP.
Back to top