Subscribe to The Spectator

Sunday 27 May 2012

Latest issue

Buy the current issue

Jobs at Telegraph

Wednesday, 9th January 2008

Hillary now odds-on favourite again

Fraser Nelson 10:12am

Ladbrokes is calling it "one of the largest shocks in political betting history" - along with journalists and pollsters the money had also predicted an Obama win. Yesterday, Ladbrokes had him even to be the next US president. Now he's on 2/1 with Hillary again favourite at 5/4. The Republicans come some distance behind: McCain 7/2 amd Giuliani 7/1. William Hill offering 10/1 on Clinton/Obama joint ticket. At one point Hillary was 8/1 for taking New Hampshire. Damn.

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (5) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

TGF UKIP

January 9th, 2008 11:31am Report this comment

Great result for the Republicans. Hillary and Obama will now have to slug it out, driving each other further and further left to appeal to their base, right throught to Feb 5th. If Frank Luntz is right Hillary then wins Super Tuesday and the GOP will have the target and motivator it wants.

Mark L

January 9th, 2008 12:30pm Report this comment

Don't agree. The coverage on this race keeps Clinton and Obama interesting. I think everyone was bored by Kerry by the 2004 convention. Plus, the Republicans are more likely to tear themselves apart. They've already ganged up on Romney. Wait until Giuliani becomes a player in the race - then there will be blood-letting.

Struan Jamieson

January 9th, 2008 1:50pm Report this comment

Now if the Republic ticket is McCain/Liebermann or McCain/Powell, then particularly on the last even Obama could be in trouble Interest comparison on Today this morning in that whereas the Iowa Democrat caucus was like a British election pre the introduction of a secret ballot, New Hampshire was a secret ballot- suggesting that in secret some white Democrats will not support a back candidate although in caucus they would.

Maria

January 9th, 2008 2:14pm Report this comment

What the results clearly show is that the media - t.v, radio, press....etc etc...try to manipilate the ordinary punter (all early editions of the broadsheets have an Obama victory). When the political pundits get it wrong all they can then shamfacedly say is that it is due to "unforseen voting elements" pleeeeezzzze. Do the ordinary punter the courtesy of admitting they got carried away by their own rhetoric backed the wrong horse, have fallen off and have sore arses..... Stop trying to vote for us, stop writing the copy before the results are in, give us a balanced view point and let us make up our own minds.

David Lindsay

January 9th, 2008 4:44pm Report this comment

The war machine cannot lose either a Clinton-McCain or a Clinton-Giuliani election, nor do I see how it could lose either Obama-McCain or Obama-Giuliani. Still, at least that would give Americans a taste of what it felt like to be living in Britain.

Post comment

Back to top

Cartoons

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

THE PRESENT FINDER

1,700 Unusual Christmas Presents Request Catalogue 01935 815 195 Quote SPEC10 for 10% discount www.presentfinder.co.uk

OLIVE BRANCH FLORISTS

Pimilco based Florist with online ordering Web: www.olivebranch.net Tel: 020 7630 1868 Fax: 020 7233 8844

RUFFS Bespoke Signet rings

62 Shore Road, Warsash, Southampton, SO31 9FT Telephone: 01489 578867 Web site: www.ruffs.co.uk