The author's Faulks, Sebastian Faulks
10:05am
The news that Sebastian Faulks has written a Bond novel says a lot about the status 007 has achieved in the culture. On the big screen and through a ruthless process of reinvention, Bond remains a player at the multiplex. Poor Pierce Brosnan thought he was doing just fine, being tortured in Korea to the strains of Madonna in Die Another Day….and then along came Daniel Craig to make Pierce look about as modern as a Robin Reliant. In the new Spectator which hits the newsstand tomorrow, Tim Walker has a terrific interview with Rupert Everett who speculates that a gay actor could never play Bond. But who knows? The film version of the character has to be almost infinitely adaptable to survive in the movie marketplace.
The literary role Bond plays in national life is entirely different. Fleming’s mastery – or rather invention – of a form stands as a challenge to authors. Kingsley Amis was obsessed by 007 and, in addition to much literary criticism, wrote a novel about him, published under the pseudonym Robert Markham in 1968, entitled Colonel Sun. John Gardner has written more than a dozen Bond novels, to which should be added the six by Raymond Benson. Charlie Higson, who wrote a marvellous essay about Bond in our special supplement last year, is making a name for himself as the chronicler of Young Bond, while Kate Westbrook (the pen-name of Sam Weinberg) has been doing the same for Miss Moneypenny. Now Faulks joins the fray. It is a tribute to Bond’s amazing grip on the national imagination. Just as Jean Rhys wanted to write more about the characters in Jane Eyre, and several attempts have been made to complete Jane Austen’s Sanditon, so authors of this calibre want to try their hand with the literary putty of 007.
Which writers would Coffee House users like to see try their hand at a Bond book – and why? A bottle of champagne to the best suggestion.







Previous


Comments
Og
July 11th, 2007 11:03amCraig Brown should have a crack at it - all non-Fleming attempts are essentially parodies, and Brown is the M of parodists. Anthony Powell would be a very bad idea, given the requirement that the story must be a thriller.
hogarth zombie
July 11th, 2007 11:27amyeah, Og. That and the fact that anthony powell died seven year ago.
MTK
July 11th, 2007 11:35amPynchon. The Crying of Lot 39 at least is basically thriller in form.
Simon Chapman
July 11th, 2007 1:20pmPolly Toynbee. Not to read what would probably be unreadable (for her eyes only) but to make her TRY. More seriously, Carl Hiassen (the last 3 words oxymoronic?) would come up with some outstandingly inventive & imaginative plot lines scenes & dialogue - probably enough quality in one book to extend the film franchise for a long time to come. Bond fans need to know that there will be many more films to come & that they will be good.
Dr A Campbell
July 11th, 2007 2:14pmNo one, I repeat, no one writes any Bond novel until my diaries have sold out of their second reprint.
Og
July 11th, 2007 2:14pmAware of that, zombie. As this is a hypothetical question, the health of the writer doesn't seem important.
antifrank
July 11th, 2007 2:46pmBrett Easton Ellis. Who else has got such a firm grip of the appropriate designer labels and brands, and the suaveness and enjoyment of casual violence that is required?
hogarth zombie
July 11th, 2007 2:47pmall right then, Og. What about Joseph Conrad or Homer?
Og
July 11th, 2007 5:12pmS Chapman, I thought of Hiaasen this morning but didn't put him in my comment. Agree with you 100%.
Og
July 11th, 2007 6:38pmI doubt Homer would suit the moral ambiguity of 007, zombie. Conrad - yes, would be excellent on the baddies.
Simon Chapman
July 11th, 2007 11:31pmI trust the champagne will be by a maker that Bond would approve of.