Saturday 21 November 2009

Jobs at Telegraph

Sunday, 10th February 2008

The gold medal for censorship and appeasement goes to the British Olympic Association

James Forsyth 2:49pm

It is quite incredible that the British Olympic Association has decided to ban British athletes from making any criticism of the Chinese regime before or during this summer’s Olympics; effectively turning every British Olympian into a propaganda tool for Beijing. The Sunday Telegraph reports that any of them who do so will either be banned from travelling to the games or, if they are already there, sent home.

We can debate whether or not a human rights abusing dictatorship should be allowed to host the Olympics or not, but it is surely wrong for British athletes to be prevented from speaking their minds. One can only hope that all Britain’s best medal hopes call the British Olympic Association’s bluff by speaking out collectively. This kind of totalitarian censorship must not be allowed to stand. 

Blogs: Martin Bright | Susan Hill | Alex Massie | Melanie Phillips | Faith Based | Cappuccino Culture

Actions: Email to a friend  |   Permalink   |   Comments (9) | Subscribe

Post this entry to:   del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit

Comments Post comment

Faceless Bureaucrat

February 10th, 2008 4:10pm Report this comment

Unbelievable! - so much for the Games offering an opportunity to bring pressure to bear on the Chinese regime to put its house in order. Your suggestion is a wise one, let our athletes speak-out collectively and see what the whimpering, simpering ODA does then - do I sense a campaign in the wind?.....

Branka

February 10th, 2008 4:19pm Report this comment

Athletes who are lucky enough to go to the Olympic games will be going in order to compete. Sportsmen and women are not politicians so why should they be expected to give their personal views? Why is there always such a desire to politicise the Olympic games? This is an opportunity for sportsmen/women to compete against the best from the rest of the world. Those who have such strong views and wish to air them should stay at home.

Fergus Pickering

February 10th, 2008 4:38pm Report this comment

Sportsmen and women are not politicians but they are people. Of course they do not HAVE to give their views. Perhaps they don't care. Perhaps they approve of dictatorship as a form of government. But if they don't then they should be allowed to say what they like. Don't you think, Branka? No, obviously you don't.

Nicholas Millman

February 10th, 2008 5:06pm Report this comment

Branka, we shouldn't even be sending a team in the first place and I'm disgusted that we are. When it comes to the PRC Brown's ability to re-point his moral compass in the interests of business opportunity is repulsive but no doubt there are many aspects of this oppressive, censoring, single party state that are attractive to him.

mike

February 10th, 2008 5:37pm Report this comment

They are athletes, and I will watch to see them compete as athletes. If they're not happy with the conditions placed upon them, then they should do the honourable thing and refuse to go. They train all their lives for this event, and the laptop heroes of this blog want them to give it all up to make an empty gesture of defiance. The gesture will be praised and forgotten within the week. However I would say to those that feel strongly about this matter, go over this year for your hols. and make a gesture yourselves, we who post will salute you.

Lee Pefley

February 10th, 2008 6:27pm Report this comment

I understand the Labour Party is mooting all-black candidate lists in the belief, apparently, that each physiological niche group ought be represented proportionately. And yet I see no similar movement on behalf of the Lithuanian-British, Jutes, Scotch-Koreans, etc. etc. And besides, aren't these (Labour)the same people who say race doesn't really exist anyway? Were I going to China, I wouldn't waste time ciriticizing that regime while Britain offers such opportunities for comment.

Herbert Thornton

February 10th, 2008 8:08pm Report this comment

At least the athletes have a choice - if they don't like the conditions China wants its guests to accept, they can elect not to go.

In Canada, exercising free speech of the wrong sort can - after the fact - end up with your being hauled before a so-called Human Rights Tribunal where politically correct bureaucrats mete out punishments with scarcely any more formalities than a traffic warden imposing a summary traffic offence fine.

Faceless Bureaucrat

February 10th, 2008 8:38pm Report this comment

Did I say ODA? - I meant BOA, of course - apologies, rather too much Claret over the Sunday roast...

Steve, Yorkshire

February 10th, 2008 9:32pm Report this comment

As the International Olympic Committee is already one of the world's largest politically undemocratic, bureaucratic and pervasive organisations I don't see why there is not remit for athletes to be political as well.

We all know how sensitive China is about maintaining face and shying away from criticism, so I regard the Olympics as an ideal opportunity to force a few in the CCP to blush and have to answer a few questions about their human rights, their relationship with Burma, environment etc... For those who see the Olympics as a 'purely sporting affair' you are incredibly naive...

Post comment

Back to top

Tag Cloud

Coffee House archive

sponsored links

Spectator recommends

Spectator classifieds

      GASCONY

GASCONY, SW France, near Condom-en-Armagnac 13th Century stone house, 21st Century luxury for 12 in 5 en-suites. 50 acres +

BIG SAND STEEL BAND

IF YOU ARE PLANNING A CHAMPAGNE RECEPTION and looking for some light entertainment, you can now hire London's busiest steel

BOSC LEBAT, Tarn et Garonne.

BOSC LEBAT, SW France. Only 45 minutes from Toulouse Airport with daily flights from most provincial airports avoiding the horrors