Gove: the Tories need to clarify what they're all about
Peter Hoskin 1:01pm
It's well worth reading Ben Brogan's lively interview with Michael Gove in the Telegraph today. On Gove's part, there's an explanation of the Tories' stance on selection in schools; a series of doting compliments about David Cameron (who is, apparently, someone "you could imagine snogging like we did to True by Spandau Ballet"); and he even tips Liam Fox to become a future Tory leader. To my mind, though, the most noteworthy passage is Gove's response to a question about Lord Salisbury's claim that the Tories need to present more policy details:
This admission is striking in itself, and it chimes with what many Tory folk are saying around Westminster. You suspect that the next few months - centring on the party conference in October - will be a concerted effort to "put flesh on the bones"."The former minister 'raises all the points we are asking ourselves,' Mr Gove says. 'Yes, we do need to provide more detail. We do need to clarify in the public mind and the minds of our supporters what it is all about. Lord Salisbury has a very acute political judgement as well as a sure sense of the party grassroots. There is nothing he said that David does not think or worry about.'"



Previous






Alf Tupper C.R.O.F.
August 3rd, 2009 1:13pm Report this commentThis erm...Spandau Ballet incident: some...questions.
Could one of our newshounds verify that this was just tongue in cheek, yes?
Steve.W
August 3rd, 2009 1:20pm Report this commentGove, the man of the moment or trouble maker? I see he is also saying nice things about David Davis, what next!
Publius
August 3rd, 2009 1:31pm Report this commentIt's all very well for Mr Gove to say that he wants to "turn every comprehensive into a grammar, but without the selection." But then he needs to explain what he will do with all those pupils who cannot manage an academic grammar-school curriculum, and he needs to explain how he will find a place for such minority "useless" subjects as Latin or Classical Greek in a school where the vast majority favour woodwork, metalwork or media studies.
There is no justice, and no use, in forcing unacademic pupils onto an academic curriculum. So what does he mean by "turn every comprehensive into a grammar"?
Jon
August 3rd, 2009 1:41pm Report this commentI'm not sure I want to know if David Cameron snogging to Spandau Ballet is tongue in cheek or not!
Also, can we clarify whether Gove is saying that HE could imagine snogging Cameron to True by Spandau Ballet, or whether one could imagine Cameron snogging anyone to said song? Is the verb being used transitively or intransitively, as Dot Wordsworth would put it?
I think we should be told.
Verity
August 3rd, 2009 1:42pm Report this comment"We do need to clarify in the public mind and the minds of our supporters what it is all about." Yes, Mr Gove. You need to clarify what you would do, if you won the election, which you won't, about halting, and hugely reversing, mass immigration. And you need to say how long after you get in, which you won't, you would hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty and the whole grotesque European projekt. Two weeks? A month? Do you understand that the fate of our country as an ancient, independent nation is somewhat more urgent than David Camerons puerile "green" issues?
John Page
August 3rd, 2009 2:03pm Report this commentWhat an embarrassing picture that was ... a failed attempt to be casual.
JONNY
August 3rd, 2009 2:15pm Report this comment'David Camerons puerile "green" issues'
I love your spirit Verity.
Let it all go hang.
Hawkeye
August 3rd, 2009 2:20pm Report this commentJon said: "I'm not sure I want to know if David Cameron snogging to Spandau Ballet is tongue in cheek or not!"
Whose tongue? Whose cheek?
(I wonder if that will get passed by the mod.s?)
Seriously, it seems like an odd comment to make. What's up with "team cameron" these days? Are they out to be "more like" the rest of us? There was Dave's "P*ssed off" and "Tw*t" comment and now this.
To be honest, I do not think that Cameron's comments deserved any fuss, but on the plus side they did show that he can react to questions, rather than ignoring them, can think on his feet and can talk like the rest of us. Compared to Gordon, .... well.... it's not much of a comparison is it?
Mirtha Tidville
August 3rd, 2009 2:21pm Report this commentWell said Verity. I agree totally...as a by the by I think UKIP will be breathing closer to the Tories necks than they like to admit by the time of the next election
Peter
August 3rd, 2009 3:15pm Report this commentYup. I want the Tories to tell me very clearly that they understand that government spends our damned hard-earned money and they should spend as little as is consistent with a civilized society.
DC is dancing around it: I want him to state it clearly that he knows the Government's money and its borrowing is our damn taxes. Don't make it abstract, everyone in Britain wants to hear it. Except maybe the Clientariat.
When I hear that stated clearly, along with them keeping their noses out of my private business, the deal is sealed for me.
Raffles
August 3rd, 2009 3:19pm Report this commentHaha, i do enjoy some of the regular contributors. So, Verity you dont think the Tories will win the next election? Best you get down the bookies sharpish, you can make a few bob out of that conviction or is it just wishful thinking? I share many of your reservations about "Dave" if not quite your antipathy but i do think many of you are extremely naive and unrealistic. Cameron has to get elected and he will do whatever he needs to do. Great policy ideas without power are irrelevant. Take a look back at Mrs Thatcher in opposition and show me her radical policy ideas. Even she played the game, until she was elected and then showed her convictions although she never made much progress on the Wefare State or Public Spending if truth be told. I fear that, much as i have sympathy with much of your criticism on policy, a Tory Party led as you would like it to be, would never be elected. End of story. A PM cannot be as utterly contemptuous of the general public as many of us are. Democracy is not a meritocracy but to paraphrase Winston, its the worst choice except for all the alternatives.
Denis Cooper
August 3rd, 2009 3:31pm Report this commentA poor interview, and hopeless "policies".
Verity
August 3rd, 2009 4:13pm Report this commentOh, Raffles, you are so suave! So knowing! So debonair!
Yes, I do not think the next government will be formed by the Tories; although it may be a hung Parliament. All Cameron has to say to win for the Tories is, he will repatriate large swathes of the Third World to the Third World, and that he will hold a referendum on the EU Projekt. He doesn't, but he does assure us, however, that the new candidates' list involves lots of social workers and teachers.
Why should I go down to the bookie's, even if I had one, when I can check the odds on the internet?
JohnAnt
August 3rd, 2009 4:26pm Report this comment"There is nothing he said that David does not think or worry about."
But that's not 'worry' as in 'be concerned enough to hammer out an answer.'
More like 'worry' as in 'chew a bone playfully'.
DSR
August 3rd, 2009 4:35pm Report this commentVerity and M Tidville - If the Tories "won't" win the election, when it comes - who will? Or will it be a hung parliament (with who in the majority seat)? Or are you forecasting an unlikely rejuvenation for Labour or a Phoenix from ashes for LibDem's. What exactly are you forecasting?
And yes, we know you don't like/rate Dave.
Rhoda Klapp
August 3rd, 2009 7:19pm Report this comment" the Tories need to clarify what they're all about"
Well, you could have read that here in the comments any time this last, oh, I don't know how long.
None of the CHers who commented ever hinted that it involved snogging and Spandau Ballet. But now I know it must be true.
If we get the politicians we deserve, what the hell did we do to deserve this?
Jeremy
August 3rd, 2009 7:43pm Report this comment'...David Cameron (who is, apparently, someone "you could imagine snogging like we did to True by Spandau Ballet")'
I'm sorry....does he mean that he was he snogging David Cameron? In a nightclub? In the eighties? To the sound of "True" by Spandau Ballet? I'm really not convinced that you should be putting images of that sort into the minds of young people today...
Fergus Pickering
August 3rd, 2009 11:29pm Report this commentHe wants to turn every comprehensive into a grammar school but without the selection. But doesn't the silly little man see that it is precisely the selection that makes the thing a grammar school in the first place. Alas, Gove is a fool.
Carly
August 3rd, 2009 11:39pm Report this commentGove meant that you could imagine Cameron snogging someone to True NOT that he could imagine himself snogging Cameron to True. Brogan has mis understood.
Publius
August 4th, 2009 11:50am Report this commentTake a look at how the swimmer Tom Daley was driven out of his comprehensive school by the excellence-hating scum for a sense of what's it's really like in such places, and why it's almost impossible to excel. It's not just academic excellence that is sneered at. Any excellence is hated.
Minnie Ovens
August 4th, 2009 12:12pm Report this commentThere is nothing he said that David does not think or worry about.'"
And that's the problem with Mr Cameron.
He's got some pretty simple decisions to make (or, at least, simple to most Conservatives), and there he is, existentially agonizing over focus groups and what the last person in his oligarchy said.
Pleae read up the OED definition of leadership.
Binky
August 4th, 2009 12:30pm Report this commentYou are so right and top of the agenda should be the sacking of any of the Shadow Cabinet found out to have looted the public purse through expense claims.
Bye Bye Mr Gove
Minnie Ovens
August 4th, 2009 12:34pm Report this commentRaffles, thank you so much for your lesson on Politics 101.
I'm voting for Mr Cameron because of his vision??
I've noticed a lot of Labour supporters not voting for a Labour candidate in preceding elections.
We have had disaster after disaster under Labour, and specifically under Brown, yet I have seen very little enthusiasm, or votes, for a man who seems to have no real beliefs and even fewer policies.
The perception is that he is scared of having any in case Labour tear them to shreds.
One thing that gets an electorate going is a Leader with a belief in specific and clear policies, especially at this critical time.
I see none of both in Westminster.
Back to top