MI6, insider dealing and robbery: it's another Harold Wilson conspiracy theory
David Blackburn 7:46pm
The timing of Harold Wilson’s resignation on March 16 1976 is an enduring mystery and conspiracy theories abound. Had the onset of Alzheimer’s unnerved him? Was he about to be denounced as a Soviet spy? There’s even a preposterous suggestion that Lord Mountbatten gave up his regular lunches with Barbara Cartland to plan a military coup against Wilson. The eminent lawyer, Sir Desmond de Silva, adds a further theory in today’s Times: stolen documents proving that Wilson was involved in insider trading were for sale to continental magazines, and that might have forced Wilson out. Sir Desmond, who later defended one of the alleged thieves, said:
“I had known nothing about this burglary. Apparently it was discovered by Wilson’s private secretary,” Sir Desmond said. Referring to notes that he had made at the time, he told The Times: “Maurice (Sir Maurice Oldfield, Chief of MI6) told me that the papers stolen from the offices were now being offered for sale to German and Dutch magazines. He then joked that he expected I would be representing one of the culprits in due course.“I was instructed to defend the first accused at Bow Street Magistrates’ Court on April 21, 1976. This gave me an opportunity during the committal proceedings to refer in open court to any of the contents contained in the boxes of material recovered by police...There was nothing sinister in the papers I saw, nothing you could say related to national security, but I saw this letter from Eric Miller [a property developer] to Harold Wilson, advising the sale of Peachey Property shares by the holder.”
Eric Miller received a knighthood in Wilson’s retirement honours list, which was controversial because there were question marks over his financial dealings. In 1977, it became clear that Miller had long had his hand in Peachey’s till and he was served with writs.Sir Desmond did not disclose the contents of letter at the time. But he believes that had it come to light at the height of a recession and industrial strife, it could have been potentially explosive. Sir Desmond’s claims prove Wilson was involved in some dodgy dealing - a novelty for this saga, which has thrived on Wilson’s paranoia and unsubstantiated rumours, such as Peter Wright’s allegations in Spycatcher. The timing between the theft, his resignation and the trial is neat. Most conspiracy theories, such as those about Jackie Kennedy ‘marrying’ Aristotle Onassis because JFK was in hiding on a Greek island, are absurd. This one seems almost plausible.



Previous






ndm
August 22nd, 2009 8:34pm Report this commentI've always found the Wilson resignation strange because a month or so before it happened a fellow student told me that there was a strong rumour to that effect doing the rounds of his department.
Kay
August 22nd, 2009 10:23pm Report this commentSo labour sleeze is nothing new then?
Frank P
August 23rd, 2009 12:14am Report this commentDavid Blackburn
"This one seems ALMOST plausible". [my caps.]
Kay
"So labour sleaze is nothing new then?"
Bwaaahahahahaha!
Dirty Euro
August 23rd, 2009 12:21am Report this commentI doubt it. Why would some trivial letter from someone else get him to resign?
The Thatchers had bigger deals with Saudi arms dealers.
He resigned because he was losing his mental facilities, and he knew it.
TrevorsDen
August 23rd, 2009 12:46am Report this commentThere was nothing strange about Wilson's resignation.
He saw he writing on the wall. He was getting old and ill and got out while the going was good.
He gave a hint soom after his re-election - he said it would take 'two years hard slog' to get Britain back on track.
And after those two years he resigned.
But for the lavender list he would have resigned with his reputation intact.
Will Rees
August 23rd, 2009 1:13am Report this commentUm, mention Eric Miller without mentioning his official verdict of suicide when the gun had be re-cocked before the second shot to the head, and you are not doing conspiracy theorists justice
Owen Morgan
August 23rd, 2009 8:34am Report this commentTrevorsDen: "He [Wilson] gave a hint soom after his re-election - he said it would take 'two years hard slog' to get Britain back on track."
Britain was in at least as big a mess in 1976 as it had been in in 1974. The "going", from the country's point of view, was anything but good. Wilson only turned sixty in 1976. At that point, it was hard to tell where the doctrinaire stupidity ended and the senility started.
He was a disastrous PM before losing power in 1970 and equally so after the 1974 elections. His reputation was then and is now intact, with or without the "Lavender List".
Anne Wotana Kaye
August 23rd, 2009 10:14am Report this commentAt least he resigned. More than can be said, so far, of the present incumbent of 10 Downing Street!
anne allan
August 23rd, 2009 10:17am Report this commentEven my Leftie politics teacher called Wilson "chicanery on legs".
logdon
August 23rd, 2009 6:53pm Report this commentKagan? Poulson? Lavender list?
OK.let's face it, bloody corrupt Labour. The boys just can't help it.
Damon
August 24th, 2009 8:47am Report this commentThe explanation in Ben Pimlott's excellent biography of Wilson, that after 4 General Elections as leader and 8 years as PM that he was fatigued still seems the most plausible.
t stokes
April 20th, 2012 2:07pm Report this commentthe tragedy is that those that know the truth cannot speak of it as we would lose our pensions, let me just say " no smoke without fire" and one day it will all be out in the wash
Back to top