One last chance on Lisbon?
David Blackburn 3:35pm
The Independent reports that the Czech Republic’s Euroscpetic President, Vaclav Klaus, is seeking to opt-out of the Lisbon Treaty’s Charter of Fundamental Rights. His argument is that Charter, which would come into force as soon as the Lisbon treaty was ratified, will lessen national sovereignty over social policy. During negotiations at the time of the treaty’s inception, the UK and Poland obtained a “protocol” measure to ensure that the Charter didn’t create new rights – effectively the last gasp opt-out the Czech seek now.
Klaus describes his request as a “footnote”; it’s anything but. EU diplomats make it clear that negotiations would have to open. A spokesman said:
“I repeat: At no point did the Czech government ask for this opt-out during Treaty negotiations. The ball is now in the court of the Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer - he'll have to decide if he wants to risk re-opening the Treaty negotiations, because that is what will be involved.”
Whether or not the Czechs will take that risk, for re-opening negotiations would throw a spanner in the works and possibly endanger the Czech’s membership, is doubtful. But this development offers British Eurosceptics a glimmer of hope because there is no such thing as a brief discussion in Brussels. It’s a slim chance, but real enough. Watch this space.



Previous






Plato-Says
October 9th, 2009 3:45pm Report this comment:) Dan knew something messy was on the cards - the potential for German citizens to claim assets is a hot button for some Czechs
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8299485.stm
Publius
October 9th, 2009 3:58pm Report this comment"possibly endanger the Czech’s membership"
More dark threats from the Euro-bullies, which Mr Blackburn seems to support. And how, Mr Blackburn, does such a move endanger the Czechs' membership exactly? The truth is that it doesn't at all.
Laughing Gravy
October 9th, 2009 4:11pm Report this commentThis will delay things but whether it will last long enough is doubtful. I expect the Czechs to be offered the Irish solution: a binding promise for their opt out of the Charter to be included in the Croation Accession Treaty.
Happy Birthday Mr Cameron
David Blackburn
October 9th, 2009 4:24pm Report this commentPublius, The Czechs' membership is endangered because they have to ratify the treaty to stay in the union. Renegotiations might, might prove a bridge too far because a retrospective opt-out is unlikely to be granted unless the Czechs issue threats. On this occassion, it's not the EU who will be issuing threats, but a member state. But, what happens if the EU calls the Czechs' bluff...? I agree, it's tendentious but possible; in any event, I don't think that Klaus will do anything other than sign."
Publius
October 9th, 2009 4:33pm Report this commentMr Blackburn
"The Czechs' membership is endangered because they have to ratify the treaty to stay in the union."
No they don't, any more than Ireland had to ratify the treaty to stay in the EU.
If Ireland had stuck to its initial referendum decision they would NOT have ratified the Lisbon treaty and they WOULD have stayed in the EU.
David Blackburn
October 9th, 2009 4:43pm Report this commentPublius, That's because more than one nation still had to ratify. The Poles have said they will ratify - that leaves the Czechs alone. They must sign, derail a self-amending treaty (hmm?) or leave. Which do you suppose is the most likely outcome? I suspect they'll sign, but they key is whether they hold out long enough to enable us to force the Tories into to giving us a refernedum, which I hope is what happens. But that does seem very unlikely.
Publius
October 9th, 2009 4:57pm Report this commentMr Blackburn:
"That's because more than one nation still had to ratify."
--The above point is wholly irrelevant. It doesn't matter how many EU nations still have to ratify. Unless ratification is unanimous, the treaty does not come into force.
"They must sign... or leave."
-- Nonsense.
"...hold out long enough to enable us to force the Tories into to giving us a refernedum, which I hope is what happens."
--If that happened, then by your argument the UK would be in the same position you claim the Czechs are in now, namely that they must sign or leave. You are wrong.
I repeat, if the treaty is not ratified by ALL members of the EU, then it does not come into force.
David Blackburn
October 9th, 2009 5:04pm Report this commentPublius,
You are right in everything except that the UK has ratified the treaty. The Czechs are alone.
Cuffleyburgers
October 9th, 2009 5:15pm Report this commentDavid - pubòius is right, if the irish or the Poles or the Czechs or god help us the English do not ratify then the treaty cannot come into force, ergo status quo ante.
sptvk
October 9th, 2009 5:24pm Report this commentSupport Vaclav Klaus! Stop the Lisbon Treaty!
http://supportvaclavklaus.wordpress.com/
http://www.petitiononline.com/sptklaus/petition.html
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=144395234460
Rob C
October 9th, 2009 5:24pm Report this commentI think with strikes in the pipeline, a very precarious economy and an even more precarious government, we could see some big problems this winter. Fuel prices are going to rise, an energy crisis lurks in the wings and the Civil Service Unions are on suicide watch... If DC holds his nerve and builds up the pressure on government, it might just fall apart long before May 2010. I personally would be surprised if we don't go to the polls early. People are rightfully angry about the mess this government has made and whilst Brown holds out for a 'game changing' event, I suspect it won't change in his direction. New Labour have so many skeletons in the cupboard now, it can only be a matter of time before it all implodes. A couple of defections (to Conservative or Lib Dem ranks) or another Baroness Scotland event and we could yet go to the polls before the Czechs ratify!
Publius
October 9th, 2009 5:51pm Report this commentMr Blackburn.
--Thank you for having the grace to concede.
"You are right in everything except that the UK has ratified the treaty"
-- Agreed. But if the treaty has not been ratified unanimously then it does not come into force.
If it has not come into force, then a future Conservative government has promised to withdraw the UK's ratification, as it is fully entitled to do, pending the outcome of a referendum.
And, of course, if that referendum should vote no, then the UK will not ratify.
And, to repeat, unless there is unanimous ratification, then the Lisbon treaty is dead, and, as Cuffley says, the EU returns to status quo ante.
This is not a parti pris point -- though you know my own views -- but a mere statement of the facts.
emil
October 9th, 2009 6:05pm Report this commentSomebody help me here.
Since Ireland obviously got some concessions on the original constitutional treaty, and czech republic are certain to get other concessions.. exactly which version of the treaty did our PM ratify "on our behalf" ?
Vulture
October 9th, 2009 6:22pm Report this comment@Publius
I agree with you entirely, execept you are forgetting one thing. The EUrocrats will not let a small thing like legality stand in their way. They will force through this treaty come what may, no matter what the Poles, Czechs or even we Brits say. A power which overrode the French, the Dutch and the Irish to get this stinking thing through will literally stop at nothing. Only the resistance of the free people of Europe will stop the march to dictatorship.
Pete, Scotland
October 9th, 2009 8:52pm Report this comment"But, what happens if the EU calls the Czechs' bluff...? "
Maybe, they are starting to think that a Russia-China alliance may be a better option?
Maybe they realise that by allowing the British to have a democratic vote things are less likely to fall apart at crunch time.
Cuffleyburgers
October 10th, 2009 8:01am Report this commentEmil I think the point is that the so-called concessions that Mr Cowen "extracted" from the EU are no such thing, they are vague promises regarding clauses to be attached to the next accession treaty, presumably croatia, at some yet-to-be defined time in the future. The same applies to the Czech concessions I imagine. As for the Germans, their consitutional court has ruled that the self-amending clauses in Lisbon are unconstitutional for the Germans, and so the Germans are looking for a parliamentary instrument to get around that. We all know the French, Italians and Spanish will ignore any bits they don't like (besides which it was drafted to suit French megalomania) so really the only people who are likely to suffer the full consequences of Lisbon is the one country whose government lacked the wit even to press for concessions let alone a referendum - GB's GB! Isn't life grand!!
Pass the vaseline Alice...
JohnAnt
October 10th, 2009 4:00pm Report this commentThis gets more confusing with each discussion. Has the UK - or has it not - secured an opt-out from the Charter of Fundamental Human Rights that Lisbon will introduce?
And yes, I know about the H o C European Scrutiny Committee's doubts as to whether the opt-out is strongly enough worded, but what does our opt-out actually do?
Back to top