Swearing allegiance
Peter Hoskin 8:51am
Lord Goldsmith will today release his review into British citizenship and social cohesion. One of his ideas: that all school-leavers take part in ceremonies to swear allegiance to the Queen. It's window dressing, a pretty policy that won't achieve anything.
After all, the situation's becoming grimmer for those school-leavers. They're faced by high levels of tax; rising debt; and little chance of getting on the housing ladder. Add to this the increasingly devalued qualifications of the British education system and the fact that young people are all-too-often victims of crime. These factors explain why so many are choosing to leave the country, and this won't be remedied by flag-waving ceremonies.



Previous








salieri
March 11th, 2008 9:12am Report this commentWhat a sad, sad little man Goldsmith has become since leaving the Bar. First Bliar's poodle and now McBean's, and on behalf of both showing such conceited indignation at the mere thought of being questioned. What does he do for a living now?
Dave B
March 11th, 2008 9:23am Report this commentIt would be a huge improvement if the political left would just stop denigrating British culture and history.
Chuck Unsworth
March 11th, 2008 10:03am Report this commentGoldsmith seems to have lost it somewhat. When asked why people 'should' swear allegiance his response seemed to be that he couldn't see 'why not'. Is this really the level of intellectual underpinning of his position? Very poor. He didn't seem to recognise that this sort of charade does little to change the fundamentals. Indeed he was of the view that, having attended a few of these 'ceremonies', they were eminently successful. Well, that's OK then. The proof is in the eating - and we're a very long way away from that. Still, I suppose it gives him something to fill his otherwise empty days.
mike
March 11th, 2008 10:14am Report this commentWe were doing OK, why can't all the parties stop coming up with things we don't care about. All governments had their own idea of how to manage the mob. The Tories before Maggie ruled by the "know your place" bit, and we did and were happy. Maggie ruled by using the police force as her incentive, do what we were told or get the c**p kicked out of us, we knew our place. Some got beaten up, some went to prison and the rest of us did nothing, most were not happy, that would be the workers and poor people. Now we have this gang, trying always to do the right thing, to please everyone, they need to do what is needed, ignore the press and the blogs, proper folk don't bother with either. That's what is needed.
Faceless Bureaucrat
March 11th, 2008 10:19am Report this commentWhat a sad end to a once great nation - I suppose we should be grateful he isn't suggesting our school-children should swear alliegence to the European flag. Still, give him time...
Mull
March 11th, 2008 10:27am Report this commentI see to be doubly f-ing irritating that you have started putting adverts in the RSS feed of your articles, even though you only give out lame partial feeds. I'm unsubscribing from this blog now, it's crap.
The Laughing Cavalier
March 11th, 2008 10:31am Report this commentThe looniest idea of all is to have some sort of "Citizens Corps". Perhaps they could be called Brown Shirts.
Caroline Hutton
March 11th, 2008 10:37am Report this commentIt's worse than that. What about children in Northern Ireland where even the policemen don't swear an oath? It will be a red rag to a bull to many youngsters for whom it will become a point of honour to refuse in a public and dramatic fashion in order to prove that they have other inimical allegiances, republican, religious or otherwise. The whole point of Britishness is that red rags are pointedly not waved
RW
March 11th, 2008 11:04am Report this commentTo propose that school children should swear allegiance to anything at all is a thoroughly obnoxious and very un-British notion. It's surprising Goldsmith can't see that. What would happen to those who refuse to comply - would they be regarded as second-class citizens? or worse, logged on a database of suspected future subversive elements? What would the Supreme Leader want to do next? Make them swear an oath of allegiance to himself?
Ted Tedford
March 11th, 2008 11:31am Report this commentI wonder if Her Majesty's Government consulted Her Majesty before tumbling into print with this absurd idea?
William Norton
March 11th, 2008 11:58am Report this commentThis is a truly exciting proposal, which copies the great success they have had at achieving unity and loyalty in the US. Of course, you couldn't copy the US example directly. It would have to be adapted to reflect life in the UK. How about this: "I promise to try to work towards a system in which on a going-forward basis I render an appropriate amount of social cohesion under the Flag of the United Kingdom, and to the unit or units of governance of which it is a meaningful representative symbol (until such time as it is replaced by that blue thing they have in Brussels), a number of Nations co-operating in a dynamic modern devolved constitutional arrangement (but not in England), under such form of religious symbolism or ethical code, if any, in which from time to time I currently claim to believe, indivisible for the foreseeable future, with a reasonable degree of liberty which takes into account the justifiable need to maintain absolute vigilance and security and social justice for all special interest and minority groups who can shout loud enough and threaten to kick up a fuss if they don't get their way."
P Orrell
March 11th, 2008 12:25pm Report this commentThe usual lefties are kicking off - 'Baroness' Kennedy for one - but the reason the Queen has been dragged in is that the royals are held in pretty high regard among the non-Anglos in the UK.
Discovering this was a big surprise for NuLab, but it's pretty sad that multiculturalism has left the UK in a position that the only common icon pretty much everybody can get behind is the Queen.
EyeSee
March 11th, 2008 1:19pm Report this commentIt is Sun reader tat, aimed at making people of the same intellectual capacity as New Labour oinks believe they are 'doing something'. As the EU makes a Sovereign redundant, why bring up an oath, just after signing a document consigning Britain to the bin, with the Queen? You can certainly see the incentive for NL to abolish education, as they are doing remarkably well with. Oh and Mike, to make observations, first observe. If you want to trot out trite remarks about the administration (Thatcher's) that fed wealth into this current shower, you will find your peers read the Sun.
Pete
March 11th, 2008 1:19pm Report this commentWhat if your child is a republican? Won't they have the freedom to express that opinion ? Should they lie and swear allegiance to the queen just like our MPs who then vote allow EU laws primacy over UK laws? laws. Our political class really are dross.
Austin Barry
March 11th, 2008 1:50pm Report this commentGoldsmith also wants to update the national anthem by "removing verses which are rarely performed". So why bother then? We're ruled by buffoons.
verity
March 11th, 2008 1:56pm Report this commentWilliam Norton - Well said! This whole idea is typically nuts. The socialists do not understand normal people and should not be trying to prescribe for them.
James
March 11th, 2008 2:08pm Report this commentIt is dawning on our political class that if you don’t have a culturally homogeneous country then people increasingly resent paying high taxes for a welfare state supporting people they have little in common with.
Thomas Widmann
March 11th, 2008 2:09pm Report this commentAre all school leavers supposed to swear this oath to the Queen, even those that are not her subjects? Let's face it, there are many pupils in British schools that are citizens of foreign countries. Would they be asked to leave the room while their classmates take the oath?
Pete
March 11th, 2008 3:18pm Report this commentCould you opt out of swearing allegiance to Britain and instead swear allegiance to England?
CS
March 11th, 2008 3:48pm Report this commentIf you are a British citizen by birth, you legally owe allegiance to the Queen whether you like it or not. So what's the point of rubbing it in for those who may not be wild about the idea but are currently not too bothered either because it doesn't really impinge on their day to day life? It's like this myth that people in sensitive positions sign the Official Secrets Act. They don't. The entire population is bound by the Act whether they sign a piece of paper to say that they agree with or not.
Lance Diatessaron
March 11th, 2008 5:11pm Report this commentCS: I signed the Official Secrets Act, and it was made clear to me that I would be bound by it forever. I resented having to sign, in the same way that I would resent having to take an oath of allegiance. I have no intention of divulging secrets, and not because I signed an agreement, but because it would be wrong. Similarly, my loyalty to HMtQ arises from the contract between myself and my country, embodied by the sovereign, and my ancestors and successors, and is not contingent on taking an oath. As RW says above, this is all very un-British.
mark
March 12th, 2008 7:57pm Report this commentLance - great post with which I completely agree. Although as a retired RAF officer I can say that I too signed the Act AND pledged an oath of allegiance to the Queen. But of course both of these were in the context of the military and so was completely normal and, erm, British. But to insist that everyone does it - Good Grief.......!!!! But as another blogger has said - it will take around 10 years for anything to be agreed so no need to get too worked up about it. I would love to hear what HM has to say about it!!!!
Michael Remington
March 13th, 2008 2:38pm Report this commentSimilar controversy in Japan, where the Education Ministry has tried to punish teachers and pupils who don't stand for the flag and anthem at graduation ceremonies. Interestingly, the Emperor - who is normally heavily marked by the government agency which runs his household and prevented from speaking on any controversial subject - made a point of telling a garden party guest within hearing of journalists that he thought this was nonsense. Hope HM takes the same line with Brown in their next meeting.
Back to top