A question of dates
James Forsyth 1:59pm
The news that Labour’s financial problems are restricting its campaigning activities with its call centres running at a quarter of their usual pre-election level does suggest that Brown might decide to go to the country earlier than the expected election date of May 6th, as Isabel Oakeshott notes. For Labour there is a real danger that the Tories could so out-spend and out–campaign Labour between now and the official start of the election campaign, with its attendant spending limits, that the Tory lead in the battle ground seats could be insurmountable even before the actual campaign has begun. Going against this is that Brown will want as long as possible to try and show that the economy is actually recovering; the last quarter’s GDP figures were a major blow to this argument.



Previous




Rainer Unsinn
November 8th, 2009 2:18pm Report this commentBrown may do well to preempt the next quarter's figures and call one ASAP. If the end of the year arrives, still in recession, he will have no hope of winning an election.
Whatever happens, then, it won't matter, anymore, he's either out on his ear or has another 5 years to drive Britain further backwards towards the 7th century.
denis cooper
November 8th, 2009 2:33pm Report this commentWell, the timing of the general election is no longer constrained by the paramount need to get the Lisbon Treaty into force beforehand and prevent it being killed off by a British referendum, but there's still no compelling reason for Brown to go earlier than necessary if the economy is likely to show some signs of recovery next spring. As I recall, under rather similar although less extreme circumstances Major clung to office until more or less the last moment. Even so I doubt that many investors would still fancy Labour's chances enough to give them large sums of money, when that cash could be better employed currying favour with the Tories.
Andy Leeds
November 8th, 2009 3:02pm Report this commentPlease God he goes to the Palace tomorrow and begs for a dissolution. The longer he stays in office and the wretched Labour Party the worse the mess will be when the Tories get into government.
Andrew Richardson
November 8th, 2009 3:08pm Report this commentBut Gordon is not going to be stand. The question that is being asked in Labour ranks, I suspect is how they engineer his replacement with enough credibility to get a hung parliament
Michael Booth
November 8th, 2009 3:15pm Report this commentIs that a picture of Cnut holding back the tide of electoral defeat?
Frank P
November 8th, 2009 3:19pm Report this commentYou forgot to ling the tractor statistics James.
oldtimer
November 8th, 2009 3:21pm Report this commentNow that the Lisbon treaty is about to be ratified - and Blair/Millichump are about to be parachuted into the Brussels bureaucracy (they fulfill the right/left balance between them) - does it now matter? No doubt their TU/KGB friends could stump up some cash just to keep them breathing and in line. But the real honey pot is in Brussels as the advance guard (the Kinnocks/Mandelson) has already discovered. This is the ultimate unaudited and unaccountable trough for the political classes. This self serving oligarchy can be relied to look after themselves in five star luxury at our expense for years to come.
Moraymint
November 8th, 2009 3:26pm Report this commentMichael Booth
Nope, I'd like to think it was Brown - in a very rare moment of honesty - looking at the back of his hand and thinking, "There are probably more hairs on the back of my hand than there are people intending to vote Labour at the General Election ....".
However, the shocking fact is that there would still seem to be 7 million or so folk out there who will vote Labour regardless of the destruction being rained upon us by Brown and the Marxist nutters currently doing their utmost to wreck the country.
teledu
November 8th, 2009 3:35pm Report this commentYes oldtimer, spot on.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if the next government introduced a law banning ex-MPs from EU posts for, say 5 years. (Although they probably haven't got the power to do that now - even if they had the inclination).
Now the treaty's in the bag (it was always about the EU first, second and third as I have been posting on here for quite some time), mugaBrown can expect no real support from Mandelson. That might be the best hope we have of getting an election and to stymy Browns crazy, scorched-earth like policies.
Roger Davies
November 8th, 2009 3:59pm Report this commentIf Labour win the next GE the FTSE will bomb, Sterling will lose out to every major currency and Foreigners will stop buying Gilts. The first act of Brown and his new New Labour Gov. will be to call the IMF. The City have already factored in a Tory majority Gov. The UK would go down the Crapper.
Dennis Churchill
November 8th, 2009 4:01pm Report this commentAs others posted above it was about the Lisbon Treaty.
It has cost Labour dear, it may even have destroyed its chances of ever getting a majority in the Westminster Parliament again, but it suited certain individuals and they will come out of it rich and powerful.
Eric
November 8th, 2009 4:03pm Report this commentWhich is coming first - The IMF or the GE?
Alex
November 8th, 2009 4:22pm Report this commentI almost feel sorry for Gordo: the ONS' record for accuracy in regards to its preliminary estimates is not good; Q3 2009 will almost certainly be revised up in future releases - by which time he'll be out of office.
mirtha tidville
November 8th, 2009 4:43pm Report this commentMoraymint......I too share your concerns but as to Labour`s voters...just look round parts of Yorkshire, Midlands and the North East to name but a few. loads dont read the papers, well not those without pages of pictures,watch debates on tv et al..sure they moan but come polling day they always put a cross for Labour. Why??..simple because they`ve always done it that way. Thankfully, and dangerously for Labour, although still millions of em, they are a dying breed.
Brown will cling on to the last possible minute
Paul
November 8th, 2009 5:00pm Report this commentThose who say it was about the Lisbon Treaty are talking rubbish. That is a view of the world thats sees the EU as the biggest issues facing the UK. That is not the view of Brown and most leading Labour figures. They see clinging to power to the last possible minute as the the main - the ONLY - issue worth thinking about. Everything and everyone else is expendable.
strapworld
November 8th, 2009 5:05pm Report this commentThe Quenn and her family can bow their heads in remembrance, at the Centotaph. Generals and Diplomats, old and present soldiers etc can bow their heads. Civilians can bow their heads in remembrence.
But Brown? No he does not bow to anyone or anything. The arrogant prat!
Boudicca
November 8th, 2009 5:33pm Report this commentNah .... It's Brown saying 'Talk to the hand, 'cos the face ain't listening."
Peter From Maidstone
November 8th, 2009 5:41pm Report this commentI thought the Browns, both Gordon and Sarah, looked dreadful at the Remembrance service at the RAH last night. He looked like a zombie, really quite unwell.
Barbara
November 8th, 2009 5:48pm Report this commentI've no sympathy for the Labour Party, from what I've learnt, the KGB infltration, the deception over the Lisbon Treaty, the unions betrayal also, its time for them to go. How can they expect public support after the above, Cameron too, has let the country down he's failed to make a stand for this country but given in without a by you leave. Does that give the impression of a man who will lead well? So, who can we look to in the next government? Well there are certain men to me who have shown grit, detirmination and the will to speak up for us the English and the country what more can any country expect. Yes they are there, not popular figures, not overly full of the love of media attention, but they are there so that's where my vote will be going. If they win great, a few seats, great, but I will know their voice will be loud and clear has its always been speaking up for us the English and the country. I don't need to spell them out.
John Moss
November 8th, 2009 6:34pm Report this commentLabour are broke. The unions will fund the general election campaign for them, but the idea that a month later they can mount a local election campaign is laughable.
They will hav ebeen badly beaten in the General Election and to then go and lose what is left of your councillors - and the funds that get channelled back to the party from their "allowances" - would be suicidal.
Oh hang on..... this is Brown we're talking about here.
He doesn't care about the country or the Labour party, he only cares about saving his own skin.
Rainer Unsinn
November 8th, 2009 6:40pm Report this comment"Talk to de hand cos de face ain't lissnin, innit"
General Zod
November 8th, 2009 6:47pm Report this commentPaul, you are not taking into account the hand of Lord Mandelmort.
2trueblue
November 8th, 2009 9:24pm Report this commentAlways said that Mandlesons jo was to hold the Labour party together until the Lisbon treaty had been ratified. Now the job is done who needs Labour, certainly not the EU. Mandleson has delivered. Hopefully the public will get the message that we do not matter to either Labour of the EU. They have what they want.
TrevorsDen
November 8th, 2009 9:33pm Report this commentStrap - IIRC, Brown did not bow his head last year. Is there some Presbyterian catch?
Major had at least a point to his hanging on - the economy had been growing for several years, he needed that to work through to the voters.
Yow Min Lye
November 8th, 2009 9:37pm Report this commentI thought the phone had gone quiet.
TrevorsDen
November 8th, 2009 9:55pm Report this commentStrap - IIRC, Brown did not bow his head last year. Is there some Presbyterian catch?
Major had at least a point to his hanging on - the economy had been growing for several years, he needed that to work through to the voters.
Michael Booth
November 8th, 2009 10:44pm Report this commentor is it a karioke rendition of Edith Piaf's
'Non, je ne regrete rien' with hand actions?
Alexandrovich
November 9th, 2009 12:04am Report this commentCripes! His index finger looks longer than his third finger. Perhaps it's true what they say...
Amadeus Plonquer
November 9th, 2009 1:55am Report this commentPeople MUST stop saying that there is nothing the Conservatives can do to prevent the Lisbon Treaty from coming into force. He can call a vote of confidence in the House today if he had the spine. If that were to trigger an early general election the EU would need to put RATification of hold.
How many Labour MPs would defy their whip in order to have a chance at being re-elected? I think many.
Heidi High
November 9th, 2009 8:34am Report this commentAlexandrovich -
Just what I was thinking!
Vulture
November 9th, 2009 9:10am Report this commentThis may be a conspiracy theory but... I should not be surprised to learn that Lord Mandelslime has become Bruin's personal fitness trainer and ordered him to take up jogging, in the hope that a Jimmy Carter style collapse will remove him from the scene and enable Postman Pat or a Millipede to be hastily shoved into his smelly old
General Zod
November 9th, 2009 9:54am Report this commentWhere do you get that idea from, Plonqueur? A general election would make no difference as we have already ratified (thanks to Labour's pusillanimity).
Simon Denis
November 9th, 2009 10:10am Report this commentNo, Michael Booth, it is not a picture of Cnut, although the name is composed of exactly the same letters, rather differently arranged.
Marc Stenberg
November 9th, 2009 11:11am Report this commentThe sooner Lisbon come into force and the sooner grassroots petitions like the Right2Bet petition can be presented to the Commission, the sooner EU citizens can take power back from their national elites who have sold them out and start demanding their freedom of choice back.
Michael Booth
November 9th, 2009 1:28pm Report this commentexcellent Simon, excellent!
Paul
November 9th, 2009 2:57pm Report this commentAre the Lisbon conspiracy theorists really suggesting that if it hadn't been for Lisbon ratification Brown would have been off to an election when Labour are 10-15 points behind in the polls? He has been working to get the job of PM for his whole life and we are in the middle of the biggest financial crisis for 80 years - an area in which he considers himself a master (!). He was never, never, never going to risk an election unless he was clearly ahead in the polls. Well if they are right he should be off to the Palace this week - lets see shall we?
Back to top