Making things worse
Matthew Elliott & Corin Taylor 5:29pm
The opening remarks of Alistair Darling’s Budget speech showed that the Chancellor is well aware of Britain and the world economy’s ongoing economic woes. How troubling and disappointing, then, that his first Red Book will only make things worse.
There are four key failings. First, the Budget raised taxes yet again, the very worst thing to do at the start of an economic downturn. £1.5 billion extra will be raised from alcohol over the next three years, £1.6 billion from cars (even with the delayed fuel duty rise), and £1.7 billion extra from businesses, much of it in the familiar form of anti-avoidance measures.
Second, it failed to modify previously announced tax rises. An 80 per cent increase in the capital gains tax rate paid by many businesses will still go ahead, despite the concession on entrepreneurs’ relief. The £30,000 non-dom charge will stay, although Mr Darling offered a small consolation not to make any further raids for this parliament and the next. Small businesses will also be hit by the increase in the small companies rate of corporation tax. Britain’s economy is not well served by higher taxes on productive investment, on highly skilled and internationally mobile people, and on the small firms that employ almost 60 per cent of the private sector workforce.
Third, the Budget was a contemporary case of “fiddling while Rome burns”. The Treasury should not be wasting its time devising measures on plastic bags when it has made such a mess of capital gains tax and Northern Rock.
Fourth, once again borrowing has surged, up £20 billion over the next four years compared with the estimate in the Pre-Budget Report just five months ago.
The Government has only itself to blame for lacking room for fiscal manoeuvre. It failed to save during the good years, leaving Britain dangerously exposed at the start of the bad. Can Alistair Darling really believe that Britain’s economy is “better placed than other economies to withstand the slowdown in the global economy”, when Britain’s deficit is the worst in the developed world?
One interesting point for future political debates that came up in the Chancellor’s Budget speech was that public spending is pencilled in to grow at 1.9 per cent in real terms from 2011, when the three-year Comprehensive Spending Review period ends. If that turns into a firm commitment, it seems likely that the Conservatives will pledge to follow it. So the political argument will then hinge on how much of the remaining “proceeds of growth” will be used to cut taxes, and how much to cut borrowing. Judging by Philip Hammond’s comments on Monday, it seems that tax cuts will be low down the list of priorities. If the Tories win the next election, and unless the Party’s big government leaning changes, expect little in the way of overall tax relief in their first parliament.
Overall, today’s performance shows that Alistair Darling seems to have learnt little from the failures of his predecessor at No. 11. Tax rises to pay for higher welfare spending, more complexity, higher borrowing and yet more meddling changes – hardly a coherent response to the current economic crisis.
Matthew Elliott is Chief Executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance [TPA]. Corin Taylor is the TPA’s Research Director.



Previous






Ian C
March 12th, 2008 6:23pm Report this commentIs anyone surprised. Some of us saw this coming in 1997 and voted with the a useless Tory Gov't, not out of love but for the alternatives. The Labour Gov has been kept alive by the longest economic upswing and Blair who ran rings round the Tories. Now we have the old Labour in government problem - weakening sterling, rising inflation, non-credible finance policies and burgeoning deficits. All can be laid at Brown's door as he was in charge of domestic and financial policy. There are probably 18 months until the next election. Now is the time to lay into this old-style socialist who learned to disguise himself behind the believability of Blair. You would have thought that Britain might finally learn its lesson -socialism does not work and will be the death knell of civilised society.
TGF UKIP
March 12th, 2008 6:49pm Report this commentMatthew and Corin, you have put your fingers on the country's biggest politcal problem in your penultimate paragraph. That is that the Government have no opposition dedicated to smaller government and lower taxes. The UK just has three big government social democrat parties with only marginally different agendas. If there should occur a parliamentary by-election in a Tory or LibDem seat in Southern England, please, please run a Taxpayers Alliance candidate. You may or may not win but you sure would blaze a trail and teach the Cameron Tories a much needed lesson about the real world.
David Mallory
March 13th, 2008 9:16am Report this commentTPA has got it all wrong. Instead of campaigning on the pernicious effects of high taxes, they should be itemising expenditure that could be painlessly cut. This needs to go beyond the usual "are you telling me that in a budget of £x gazillion, there isn't any waste?". Of course there is - but let's nonetheless hear some specifics. Problem is, that's not as easy to do and you have to do proper cost-benefit analysis. I know that the Government's CBA is not exactly renowned for its rigour, but like it or not, the burden of proof is on us would-be tax-cutters. It's not enough to talk about the sunlit uplands of a low-tax economy. If it's true that there is little fiscal room for manoeuvre (and I think that formulation dramatically understates the case when you start projecting the public finances over the next 20 years and more), then for tax cuts to be on the agenda at all, you have to take some really quite radical action to curb and ultimately reverse upwards pressure on spending. There is some urgency to this - but it is more important to get it right than to get it tomorrow and it all needs to be very carefully thought through and implemented to avoid an implosion of the sort that happened in many parts of the country in the 1980s when the last round of (necessary) structural reforms was implemented.
Back to top