Bradshaw goes to war against the Sun
Peter Hoskin 12:51pm
Peter Mandelson has already claimed that the Tories and the Sun have “effectively formed a contract", but today Ben Bradshaw takes the insinuations even further. Here's the relevant passage from his interview with the Guardian, with my emphasis in bold:
"Echoing the views of the business secretary, Lord Mandelson, Bradshaw says of News International and the Tories: 'There is no doubt there's a deal ... The Tories have basically subcontracted their media and broadcasting policy to News International. It's brazen.' He fires off a list of Tory policies – including a commitment to TV news free from impartiality rules and Cameron's promise to rein in the media regulator, Ofcom – to demonstrate the extent of the collusion between the two, publicly denied by members of the shadow cabinet.Has a deal really been hammered out over a dining table in north Oxfordshire, where News International executives and members of the Tory high command occasionally socialise at weekends? 'It's more than one table,' Bradshaw says. 'I know people who have been at these discussions. The proof of the pudding is in the policy.'"
Does Bradshaw really have the inside track on a "deal" between the Tories and News International? If so, it's a bigger story than one aside in an interview would seem to suggest. But, whether he does or not, I can't help thinking that it's unwise for a Culture Secretary to oppose the media organisation in such vicious terms. Quite aside from the risk of turning Murdoch (further) against Labour, it hardly makes the government seem objective and levelheaded.



Previous








Sally Chatterjee
November 23rd, 2009 12:58pm Report this commentHe strikes me as too shrill, too ready to argue. Especially as it sounds like sour grapes and it looks expedient.
After all, Blair travelled all the way to Australian to meet Rupert Murdoch and his executives in 1995.
Ed P
November 23rd, 2009 1:10pm Report this commentWhy anyone listens to a word from this preening, intellectually-challenged "Culture" Secretary is astounding. A better example of the hollow core of NuLab people would be hard to find.
Sue MV
November 23rd, 2009 1:16pm Report this commentNuLabour should know. They are the experts in state run media operations!
David Ossitt
November 23rd, 2009 1:17pm Report this comment“it hardly makes the government seem objective and level-headed.”
Surely that is the point; this government of is not objective or level headed, it is a socialist government of liars, cheats and malcontents, all of whom were delighted when the Sun Newspaper danced to their tune, but who can not even begin to understand why the Sun has now abandoned them.
It is time for a change; time for some honest pragmatism in politics for far too long we have had to listen to the gobbledygook of fourth rate socialists, who will vomit their socialist neo-Marxist claptrap with every word spoken.
Stuart Beamish
November 23rd, 2009 1:22pm Report this commentThose of us who go to great lengths to avoid putting money into the dirty digger's pockets will hope this story is false, but of course NuLabour are the home of deals of this type, so they should know.
R King
November 23rd, 2009 1:30pm Report this commentSeems like a pretty smart move Ben if they have done a deal. Let's hope it's a better one that Blair signed up to.
Now stop being a silly girl's blouse and get on with it!!
Frank Leader
November 23rd, 2009 1:30pm Report this commentWhat goes round comes round. I don't remember Bradshaw complaining when the Sun mistakenly supported Labour. If they had not we might have been spared the last 12/13 years of the grossest incompetence.
dilys
November 23rd, 2009 1:32pm Report this commentSo Ben Bradshaw has a hissy fit shortly after Mandy and on the same subject. Any news for us?
John Barrett
November 23rd, 2009 1:35pm Report this commentI really do sometimes wonder about the correspondents in The Speccie these days.
Bradshaw is quite unhinged, his accusations that the BBC was "Tory" are evidence of that. It is a desperate accusation from a failed and soon to be ex-minister ( just ask the fishermen what they think of La Bradshaw ).
luke
November 23rd, 2009 1:37pm Report this commentDoes anyone here actually read the sun though?
It's not just switched its editorial line. The entirely of the news coverage has adopted a visciousness about the labour government that is quite disturbing.
Disturbing because it is, you imagine, what the papers would look like in some kind of totalitarian society - just totally biased news coverage which bares no relation to what actually happened.
Even on things like the floods at the weekend, the sun didnt carry a single quote or line from the prime minister, preferring instead to take david cameron's words.
Editorial judgments are one thing - and the sun are totally within their rights to support whoever. But when that starts routinely impacting news coverage I think thats a dangerous thing myself.
JGS
November 23rd, 2009 1:50pm Report this commentThe Heseltine rule applies to Mt Bradshaw: never trust a man with over-coiffed hair.
DavidDP
November 23rd, 2009 1:55pm Report this commentCore vote strategy. Think Hague "saving the pound" or Howard "it's not racist to be concerned about immigration". Labour know they can't win, but need to avoid a collapse in the core.
Andy Carpark
November 23rd, 2009 2:03pm Report this commentWhy do we need a Minister for Culture, Media and Sport?
Mark C
November 23rd, 2009 2:08pm Report this commentLuke - you may or may not be right about the Sun, but have you ever read the Mirror? I don't hear many complaints from Labour about its journalistic values.
Frizby
November 23rd, 2009 2:13pm Report this commentThe Sun needs to sell papers and generate web site traffic like all the others and gauges the mood of the country as anti-Labour and desperate for a GE. They are not dependent on License fees or smarmy Labour hand-outs or Knighthoods etc...
JONNY
November 23rd, 2009 2:16pm Report this comment'The entirely of the Mirror news coverage has adopted a visciousness about the Conservative Opposition that is quite disturbing.'
Thanks Luke. Couldn't have put it better myself (spelling excepted).
Alex
November 23rd, 2009 2:21pm Report this commentIt was less damaging for Labour to be supported by Murdoch because Labour wanted right wing votes...
The Sun won't deliver any left wing votes for Cameron...
In fact if the belief that that Cameron is in Murdoch's pocket gains credence it will be damaging to the Tory cause.
The Labour line will be "...remember the last time we were governed by the Sun....millions unemployed and a price worth paying, so we were told...."
In2minds
November 23rd, 2009 2:33pm Report this commentBradshaw talks about “a dining table in north Oxfordshire”. We should remember that Tony Blair had to go to Australia to get Nulabour in front of Murdoch. Is Bradshaw jealous about these two journeys and the inevitable comparison?
Verity
November 23rd, 2009 2:34pm Report this commentFrank Leader writes: "... we might have been spared the last 12/13 years of the grossest incompetence."
Are you still that naive? "Grossest incompetence", when they carried out the entire hollowing out of society and the destruction of Britain under the radar?
The correct charge is "grossest malice".
strapworld
November 23rd, 2009 2:41pm Report this commentIs there any truth in the rumour that Bradshaw was privately seeking a job with Sky when he loses his Exeter seat,and that Murdoch told him he had no chance?
I wouldn't put anything past these incompetent lightweights.
General Zod
November 23rd, 2009 2:43pm Report this commentDon't read the Sun, but can't say I feel remotely disturbed by what you describe, Luke. I do, however dip into the Mirror (you have to know what the enemy is saying - Maguire in particular) and it would nto be possible to have a more biased slant on the news than that paper.
Boudicca
November 23rd, 2009 2:44pm Report this commentWhat a big girls' blouse Bradshaw is. Does he really think we give a monkey's for his opinion on The Sun and the Conservatives.
Nicholas
November 23rd, 2009 2:48pm Report this commentThis numpty Bradshaw is one of the dangerous ones, together with Burnham and that other shrill witch Harmon. The three of them should be round a cauldron cackling at the Scottish Prince.
Alex
November 23rd, 2009 2:56pm Report this comment"Does Bradshaw really have the inside track on a "deal" between the Tories and News International? If so, it's a bigger story than one aside in an interview would seem to suggest."
Surely the question is: how is it possible to believe that there has not been a deal...
evidence...
Young Mr Murdoch goes to Edinburgh and attacks the BBC as "state sponsored news" and a barrier to competition (i.e New International's ambitions) but gets no supporting noises from government. A few days later the Sun switches support to the Conservatives. A few days further on the Conservatives Culture Spokesman attacks the BBC and says that, if elected, they will scrap the BBC's Royal Charter and look at its website, sales and international operations'.
Not proof exactly, but you don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to see the logic.
Ken
November 23rd, 2009 3:15pm Report this comment@luke- "...what the papers would look like in some kind of totalitarian society - just totally biased news coverage which bares no relation to what actually happened."
Oh I dunno page three continues to "bare" a close resemblance to its long-standing traditions!
And even if t'were so how different is that from the daily vitriol pouring out of the government information service masquerading as the BBC?
Michael Booth
November 23rd, 2009 3:24pm Report this commentIt's a Bradshaw hissy-fit, nothing more. Quite happy when The Sun was shining on ZanuLabour but rather miffed now the clouds have swept in. Oh dear oh dear. I'm sure Bradshaw will soon have his Sou'wester on and will be looking for the rainbow...
Occasional Ostrich
November 23rd, 2009 3:28pm Report this commentDid anyody see this clown on 'Newsnight' last week? He seemed to me to be bidding for the spot hopefully (or maybe not) to be left vacant by David Icke.
2trueblue
November 23rd, 2009 3:43pm Report this commentWould he belong to the same party that have had the Blair/Brown Broadcasting Corporation in their pocket for the past 12yrs?
Dorothy Wilson
November 23rd, 2009 3:54pm Report this commentThis man is a twerp of the first order - and there are a good many of them in Labour. His comments are probably part of the back-lash we can expect from Labour. Also, as JGS says never trust a man with over-coiffered hair. Or dyed hair eg Burnham.
That being said, don't under-estimate the damage they can do. Scorpion and tail come to mind.
Yarnesfromhorsham
November 23rd, 2009 4:14pm Report this commentNoticed over the weekend on a TV news that Ben was carrying Mandy's bag. Did you see Mandy's face when asked about the appointment of Baroness Ashton - classic
Frank Leader
November 23rd, 2009 4:38pm Report this commentVerity I stand corrected What goes round "grossest malice" is much better.
Fernando
November 23rd, 2009 4:48pm Report this commentThe implication is that The Sun is only backing Cameron because of promised favours. Which begs the question of what were the favours proffered by Labour from 1996 to 2008. Could it be no VAT on newspapers? Or possibly no referral to OFT of Murdoch’s dominance in the UK media? Then again, perhaps it was just privileged access to information, such as Cherie’s pregnancy or the postponing of the 2001 general election.
EyeSee
November 23rd, 2009 5:32pm Report this commentThe Sun side with the Conservatives and suddenly they are under their control. Not quite eh? Not like a certain newspaper, who's editor I believe was up to his neck with the litle Brown gang who were dreaming up slurs against Tories. Now that is being in cahoots. Or what about the control Mad Al Campbell thought he should have when, with affected, mock outrage he demanded all manner of stupid things, because someone said one word in one live radio programme early one morning, that he didn't like? There is one bloke for whom we can show humanity when, having come back to our senses we lock the man up in a cell with windows. He can then continue licking them out of harms way.
Valerunner
November 23rd, 2009 5:33pm Report this commentThe source of this line is of course Alistair Campbell, who was floating it a couple of weeks ago on This Week, just after the Sun became Public Enemy No.1 for being nasty about our Great Leader's spelling. Tories = Sun = Nasty! Have you got that, voters???
Marcher Baron
November 23rd, 2009 6:18pm Report this comment"TV news free from impartiality rules" I thought we already had that; it's called the BBC.
Chuck Unsworth
November 23rd, 2009 7:33pm Report this commentDoes the cretinous Bradshaw seriously believe he's going to win this one? Probably he's stupid enough to think he can.
Frank P
November 23rd, 2009 10:11pm Report this commentBradshaw goes to war against the sun? Who does he think he is, Icarus? This waxy-winged woofter should watch it, or he'll be banished to Ikaria!
Beer Moth
November 23rd, 2009 10:32pm Report this commentHe's spent. He's been on the slide ever since 'Four Weddings..."
Amadeus Plonquer
November 24th, 2009 1:03am Report this commentBuried in this article is a perfect comparison between Windmill Dave and Phoney Tony.
Tony Blair had to fly his entourage half way around the planet to Australia to do a deal with Murdoch while Dave only had to cycle to Oxfordshire.
The Tories should be congratulated for REAL progress in minimising their 'carbon footprint'.
Mike
November 25th, 2009 3:23pm Report this commentBradshaw like most of Labours pathetic whiners were more than happy to have Murdoch on board to get into power but when the boots on the other foot they complain bitterly like a bunch of kindergarten infants being told to clear up the mess they created. Its time Labour ministers got some back bone and engaged in honest debate rather than looking like a bunch of half baked pansies who are clueless about solving the ills they brought down onto the country.
Back to top