What possible justification can there be for this?
James Forsyth 2:01pmFrom The Guardian’s write up of the latest TPA report on public sector pay:
“Those earning more than the prime minister include Professor Salman Rawaf, the director of public health in Wandsworth, who has a package of up to £370,550”
I can accept that some people in the public sector with certain particularly valubale skills might have to be paid more than the PM. But I find it hard to see why Wandsworth is offering its director of public health a package worth more than a third of a million pounds. One hopes that the Tory policy which will see the Chancellor having to sign off on any public servant being paid more than the PM will put an end to this kind of excess.



Previous







Hawkeye
December 4th, 2009 2:43pm Report this commentIt is a bl**dy disgrace!
'Nuff said!
Chris lancashire
December 4th, 2009 2:55pm Report this commentThere isn't any justification for this. Unfortunately it is symptomatic of what has happened under Labour - the ratcheting up of senior level salaries is widespread and requires something as draconian such as Osborne's Law to begin to correct these abuses. Equally unfortunately, we will find that considerable time has been spent in constructing watertight contracts which will not make the task easy.
One further thought - for those who argue they could earn more in the private sector - come and have a go if you think you're hard enough.
Mark Clarke
December 4th, 2009 3:02pm Report this commentIt is outrageous. But you are targetting the wrong organisation.
This is not an appointment by Wandsworth Council - whose logo you have.
Rather this is an appointment by the Primary Care Trust - the local NHS.
Wandsworth Council would not waste such money which is why they have the lowest Council Tax in Britain. This is another example of wasteful NHS spending.
C
December 4th, 2009 3:24pm Report this commentYou might want to check your facts. He doesn't work for the Borough, he works for Wandsworth Primary Care Trust.
Tim Carpenter LPUK
December 4th, 2009 3:29pm Report this commentIt all goes back to the conceit of Council Leaders calling themselves CEOs or such. They are Town Clerks.
A fish rots from the head.
Ian Walker
December 4th, 2009 3:37pm Report this commentThe problem with the public sector is that it has to be paid for. This mans salary, justified or not, requires an average of just over 38 people to work and pay taxes.
Sir Graphus
December 4th, 2009 3:49pm Report this commentWhen I graduated 20 years ago, we all had a good laugh at the vegan leftie idiots that used to shout “fascist” a lot and named everything the Student Union owned after Nelson Mandela. They all had to go work in useless sounding local government jobs for about 30% less money than the rest of us. It was our triumphant vindication of how doing a useful degree which had more than 5 hours of lectures a week was superior to their life of humourless communist theorising and smoking pot.
Well they’ve turned the tables on us, now, haven’t they. Who’s in bloody charge now? They’ve managed to tax all our pensions out of existence, kept theirs, increase their wages above ours, and kept their holiday and other privileges, while not having to work hard at all.
However, the pendulum will swing back the other way. It must.
John Porter
December 4th, 2009 3:49pm Report this commentYou might also want to check whether Prof Rawaf works for Wandsworth PCT. If you do, you would find he left some time ago.
So wrong organisation, naming a person who doesn't work there. Other than getting the salient facts entirely wrong, a really good article.
Chuck Unsworth
December 4th, 2009 4:06pm Report this commentHell of a lot of very sick people in Wandsworth.
Curbishly
December 4th, 2009 4:22pm Report this commentOoops!
Mark, Edinburgh
December 4th, 2009 4:32pm Report this commentIf you google the name it seems someone of an identical name gives presentations about GP services in South London to medical conferences in BRAZIL!
So guess there could be expenses on top of the pay?
Nick Longworth
December 4th, 2009 4:42pm Report this commentThe TPA is a bit out of date. NHS Wandsworth appointed a new DoPH in September. I've no idea what her package is... do they?
http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/legacy/news/pressreleasedetail.asp?id=6654
dilys
December 4th, 2009 4:45pm Report this commentWhy has the PM's salary become the yardstick by which others are judged?
Given his performance as chancellor and pm he should be getting less than my pension.
Snowman
December 4th, 2009 4:56pm Report this commentAnother plus mark in the book of achievements of the most treasured institution, the NHS. Why should the package be worth half a million or more? The money comes from the common purse, doesn't it?
RMH
December 4th, 2009 5:23pm Report this comment400 grand for a that, no wonder the council tax is like an unlubricated and unwanted entry.
David Lindsay
December 4th, 2009 6:16pm Report this commentThe Public Sector Rich List? What, you mean RBS?
Put the bankers on public sector pay. Why the hell aren't they already, since they are now in the public sector? No doubt because they would then be so poor as to have to pay income tax.
Oh, and if the directors of RBS resign, fill the vacancies internally. That is, internally within the public sector as a whole. Better still, do it at random off the Electoral Register.
TrevorsDen
December 4th, 2009 6:26pm Report this commentWandsworth NHS (Sept 09) say
'NHS Wandsworth is delighted to announce that we have appointed Houda Al-Sharifi as the new Director of Public Health to the Board. This is a joint appointment with Wandsworth Borough Council'
So its a joint appointment and for a different person as claimed by the Guardian.
Or how many directors of public health does Wandsworth need? No mention of Salary.
gareth
December 4th, 2009 6:27pm Report this commentthanks Mark Clarke for pointing that out.
Moraymint
December 4th, 2009 9:24pm Report this commentThat's over 10 times what I took in drawings from my small business last year and this year as I and my business partner battle like hell to keep the wheels on (in practice this means 75 hour weeks and no holiday this past year).
I'm also paying my company's FY 07-08 tax liability out of my personal savings (or I'd be in jail).
On this basis, I am helping to pay Professor Rawaf's salary. He'd better be worth it.
I'm also thinking that this is utter madness and wonder why I keep at it. Over at the Burning Our Money Blog, Wat Tyler showed recently that we've reached the stage where one private sector taxpayer (ie mug like me) is funding 1.2 state-dependent citizens (like Rawaf + one-fifth of a Rawaf).
Is it any wonder we're going bankrupt?
2trueblue
December 4th, 2009 11:27pm Report this commentThat is what we know he is being paid. Management consultants eat up quite a bit of money also. Money that could be spent on the front line.
Alic
December 5th, 2009 1:28pm Report this commentImagine that this is NHS bollocks not Wandsworth bollocks. Or the Wandsworth council tax payers need to get some pitchforks...
Get pitchforks anyway. No public servant should be paid 370k - Servants of the state, not parasites.
HJ
December 5th, 2009 5:48pm Report this commentThe real scandal is that you can bet that this person won't make one iota of difference to public health in Wandsworth.
The key factors in public health are sanitation, housing, diet and lifestyle.
Back to top