What to do if you can't tax or borrow out of trouble
Andrew Haldenby 6:08pm
Today one Finance Minister in the British Isles cut spending, cut borrowing by 1 per cent of GDP compared to his last Budget and cut the national debt by 5 per cent. It wasn’t Alistair Darling.
Brian Lenihan cut Irish public spending by 7 per cent (equivalent to a £40 billion cut in the UK). He cut the public sector headcount, pay, pensions for new entrants and unemployment and child benefits.
Alistair Darling postponed the inevitable reckoning on the finances until the pre-election Budget, the post-election Budget or a currency or debt crisis if that comes first. Brian Lenihan gave us the flavour of what that reckoning will be and how it will be argued.
His arguments against further borrowing and taxes and in favour of spending cuts stand repeating:
Andrew Haldenby is director of Reform“Some have argued we should continue to borrow and wait for the economy to grow again before tackling the budget deficit. There are three reasons why this is not a viable proposition.First, we know from the 1980s how large deficits, left unchecked, can lead to a dangerous spiral of mounting debt and ever increasing interest payments. Never again should we return to a position where all of our income taxes go to pay interest on the national debt. Second, international debt markets have become more crowded and more fragile. If lenders were to lose faith in our ability to restore order to the public finances, the consequences for our economic wellbeing would be profound. Third, only decisive action will restore confidence. Consumers will only start to spend and business owners will only invest and create jobs if they believe we are tackling our deficit problem now.
In our everyday lives we do not borrow to pay for our household bills. We cut back and seek to live within our means. The same strictures apply at national level. Borrowing hundreds of millions a week to pay for day to day spending is just not on. Stabilising the deficit is the next key milestone in our plan to deliver economic recovery for this country.
Others have argued for increases in taxes as a means of stabilising the deficit. But those who demand higher taxes fail to recognise what I have already done …. But we have reached the limit. We will not create jobs by increasing the penalty on work and investment.
So if we cannot tax our way out of our difficulties and we all agree in this House that we cannot borrow our way to recovery then the only remaining option is to reduce our spending. No one wants to cut spending but the cost of providing public services has to be reduced to bring it in line with sustainable revenue levels and to help restore our international competitiveness.”



Previous









Roy Smith
December 9th, 2009 6:35pm Report this commentThis sounds so much like common sense one is inclined to think highly unlikely to be taken up in Westminster.
Tom Pride
December 9th, 2009 6:46pm Report this commentIt is worth looking at the actual Irish pay cut numbers:
“The Government is to introduce tiered pay cuts of between five and eight per cent for most staff in the public service as part of an overall plan to reduce the public sector pay bill by over 1 billion next year.
However, higher earners face salary reductions of between eight and 15 per cent while the pay of the Taoiseach will be reduced by 20 per cent in line with recommendations of a recent report of the Review Body on Higher Remuneration.”
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2009/1209/breaking72.htm
This is a forewarning of the extent of the measures which may well be required in the UK to bring the Government finances back to fiscal reality. My suspicion is that Darling and the Treasury Civil Servants are aware of this but are keeping it under wraps ahead of the election.
GeoffH
December 9th, 2009 7:22pm Report this commentTom, isn't rather the point that while pay cuts for the public sector might be a measure they would consider at some point AFTER an election, Darling and Brown would NEVER in a million years suggest cutting ministers' pay, let alone MPs' pay.
Laban Tall
December 9th, 2009 8:53pm Report this commentIt was interesting to listen to the Irish budget on the RTE website after Darling's fantasy show earlier. Different worlds.
Nick
December 9th, 2009 11:30pm Report this commentI mentioned this yesterday on a post but I don't see why Darling doesn't instigate 5-10-15% salary cuts for public sector workers. It avoids having to make anyone redundant, it avoids having to discriminate between "front-line" nurses and diversity co-ordinators and it shows that everyone is in the same boat.
Back to top