The Ed Balls approach to fiscal management
Peter Hoskin 10:28am
Considering the fiscal crisis we face, this revelation in Andrew Rawnsley's column is particularly dispiriting:
It makes you wonder what the PBR would have looked like had Balls succeeded in becoming Chancellor a few months ago."[Gordon Brown] has been egged on by Ed Balls [to make more spending promises], partly because the schools secretary is also obsessed with that old dividing line, partly because he wanted to be able to boast that he had won more money for his department. I am reliably told that the wrangling between the schools secretary and the chancellor went on into the early hours of the morning on the day of the PBR itself. The result was that some of the extra spending beaten out of Mr Darling by Mr Balls did not get into the document because it was already printed. Yvette Cooper, wife of Mr Balls and work and pensions secretary, was also refusing to settle right up to the wire – and beyond it. They may celebrate by treating themselves to His and Hers boxing gloves, but some colleagues think their brinkmanship was outrageous."
P.S. George Parker and Alex Barker had more on this story in yesterday's FT.



Previous






saltirethinking
December 13th, 2009 11:11am Report this commentEd and Yvette, two more stools in the pan of destiny.
Mitch
December 13th, 2009 11:17am Report this commentSo its sod the country I have a career to think about. Ed balls if you read this You are pathetic!
Wrinkley But Nice
December 13th, 2009 11:23am Report this commentOn the Andrew Marr Show this morning Balls claimed that while the "sorting out of details" went on into Tuesday night, Alistair Darling had already gone to bed. Whose PBR ?
Nick
December 13th, 2009 11:24am Report this commentAlistair Darling is Chancellor of the Exchequer, one of the Great Offices of State and he's been a member of the Cabinet since 1997. Why doesn't he just tell Ed Balls to f*** off ?
Moraymint
December 13th, 2009 11:27am Report this commentIt's this sort of vignette, if true, that really does make me hope fervently for a Labour election victory.
The result on Britain's streets, in due course, would make the French Revolution look like a picnic.
The UK's insolvency - masked as it is for the time being by political shenanigans and a delayed fuse - would become an everyday reality for thousands of state-funded organisations and, therefore, millions of people: claimants and state employees. That is, increasingly the state would be unable to meet its payments as they fell due.
At that point, millions of currently disinterested state clients (Labour voters) would take an active and unhealthy interest in politics.
Bring it on.
At least then a real political leader (Churchill-like) might emerge who could/would grip the situation and start the process of putting Great Britain back on its feet.
Meantime, scum politicians like Balls continue to wreak their Marxist havoc.
Crooked Crocodile
December 13th, 2009 11:27am Report this commentAll Mr and Mrs Balls care about is their status and ministerial salary. As a posh public schoolboy from a rich family, who never quite fitted in during his school days, all Ed Balls is bothered about is making sure that he leaves as big a mess as possible to the other successful and confident public school boys in that other party when they come into power.
Sally Chatterjee
December 13th, 2009 12:16pm Report this commentHe's trying to look good for the upcoming Labour Party election contest. As if being Brown's closest ally isn't damaging enough, the hapless man now wants to put his party popularity ahead of the nation's economic stability.
I believe his seat is a marginal, no?
Simon Stephenson
December 13th, 2009 12:38pm Report this commentJust imagine, if you will, that the Balls/Brown guiding principle for advancing society is not to support the current monetary value system, but to cripple it. Do they see a system of value-exchange as being irreconcilable with the sort of centralised power which is their overriding political goal? Is their real intention to corrupt money to such an extent that there will be no alternative but to replace choice by allocation?
Isn't this a more plausible explanation for their actions than that they are so half-witted as to have spent the last twelve and a half years making mistakes?.
R
December 13th, 2009 12:56pm Report this commentThe way that the country is run is really depressing.
As someone said above, why did Darling even discuss this with Balls/Cooper once his mind was made up? In no business would the CFO put up with this kind of ridiculous behaviour, let alone actually make concessions due to being hassled like this.
Nicholas
December 13th, 2009 1:43pm Report this commentSimon Stephenson. Yes. They are Marxists and have presided over a stealth cultural revolution.
Snowman
December 13th, 2009 2:01pm Report this commentMoraymint: I side with Charlie Marx – if the English were to have a revolution, it will be in gardening.
Robert Williams
December 13th, 2009 2:03pm Report this commentSally "I believe his seat is a marginal, no?"
I think that must have been a joke; per Wiki "In the 2005 general election he was elected MP for Normanton with a majority of 10,002 and 51.2% of the vote
gareth
December 13th, 2009 2:25pm Report this commentYes moraymint - our island history, the common law in particular is a story of resistance to bad government. I do hope conservative half measures and appeasement will be miraculously postponed so that Labour can reap the whirlwind and the voters get a taste of their own hypocrisy.
Bring it on!
Chris lancashire
December 13th, 2009 4:54pm Report this commentTry saying "so what?" to the international bond markets or the IMF.
Marcher Baron
December 13th, 2009 6:42pm Report this comment"The result on Britain's streets, in due course, would make the French Revolution look like a picnic." Hélas, mon ami Moraymint, the English (at least) don't appear to do French style revolution (just think of all those missed opportunities in 1688, 1848 and 1968). Civil War, maybe. Or as El Gordo would call it, Class War.
TGF UKIP
December 13th, 2009 7:08pm Report this commentWhile one half of me goes with the substance of Moraymint's post which is what a number of us have been hankering after for the past few years, I also fear that what Simon Stephenson says has considerable merit.
Certainly across the pond there is a strong body of opinion which believes that this is exactly what the marxists who occupy the White House are about. Bringing about the collapse of the US economy by submerging it in debt and unaffordable entitlements and using their political skills and their supine media to put the blame on the free market system ie exactly as Brown is doing by blaming the banks. The command and control state is then presented as the only viable option.
Given the level of mass indoctrination over the past three decades via the education system and via state broadcasting, "the common sense and good judgement" of the British voters can no longer be relied upon.
For those Coffee Housers who want to see firm evidence for just how successful the Brown message is and how utterly useless and politically outperformed the Cameron Tories are, all you need do is look at the wide geographical spread of council by-election results from the past week set out by David Lindsay in his post on Fraser Nelson's piece on this weekends poll on Saturday night. Uniformly dire for the Tories and almost correspondingly splendid for Labour. No wonder Brown & co are so confident.
Paul M
December 13th, 2009 8:37pm Report this commentIt's becoming more and more obvious that having MP's and ministers without substantial previous experience of real life in the private sector is akin to having armed forces generals brought in directly from the New Age Poets' Cooperative Commune. People like Ed Balls and his wife simply live in another world, and are intellectually incapable of connecting today's spending with tomorrow's consequences. I think we need fundamental reform of who can actually be an MP and who can hold a ministerial position, of whatever rank. The current system obviously does not result in competent management of the country's affairs, and it will be young people today, and our children after them, that pay the price.
FaustiesBlog Libertarian
December 13th, 2009 11:04pm Report this commentMein Gott! Imagine the glassy-eyed Marxist zealot as Chancellor!
Wilhemina Bothwell
December 14th, 2009 9:02am Report this commentCould his objective in wanting more money for schools be for the purpose to futher indoctrinate and corrupt our children ?
Dorothy Wilson
December 14th, 2009 9:18am Report this commentSurely the heading should be: Balls approach to fiscal mismanagement.
Back to top