Prepare for Eurocracy
David Blackburn 4:25pm
Baroness Ashton outlines her objectives in today’s Times. She makes a number of sensible points on Afghanistan, European aid efforts and energy security; but, despite this week’s revelations and ironically in view of the Peter Brookes cartoon above the article, Iranian nuclear proliferation receives a cursory sentence. This undermines the EU’s committment to enforcing sanctions on an obviously antagonistic and mad regime, and suggests that the notion of the EU taking pre-emptive military action with its allies is fanciful. The implication is that defence and security are secondary issues, or simply too divisive for member states to reach accord.
What, therefore, is the point of an EU foreign ministry? Ashton opines that the Lisbon treaty ‘gives us new possibilities to make Europe better and more relevant for its citizens. It can also help us find a stronger and more coherent voice on the world stage. The reputation of the EU in the world is a good one, based on our strong values of freedom and democracy, the rule of law, and respect for human rights'. Much of that requires the mass suspension of disbelief, but I concede that the treaty presents an opportunity to augment the EU's international clout. Concerted unilateral action on an issue like Iran would provide that, but Ashton’s self-confessed ‘first priority’ is to build a diplomatic service. That’s right, more bureaucrats. She devotes two lengthy paragraphs to the subject.
‘My first priority will be to build the new diplomatic service that the Lisbon treaty foresees. The European External Action Service will be based in Brussels, with representations throughout the world. It should be a network that is the pride of Europe and the envy of the rest of the world, with the most talented people from all member states of the EU working in our common interest.It should offer our citizens added value to what their countries already do, and give our partners around the world a trusted and reliable ally on European issues. It should be a foreign service for the 21st century.’
Employing a phalanx of EU diplomats when no standardised and encompassing EU foreign policy exists is Brechtian in its absurdity. Surely diplomats from members’ services could be seconded to promote EU action when required? The Lisbon treaty has not inaugurated change; it has enshrined continuity.



Previous







Dorothy Wilson
December 17th, 2009 5:03pm Report this commentSo what is your budget Cathy Ashton? Please do come clean on this figure. After all taxpayers have a right to know since it is their money you are spending.
Peter From Maidstone
December 17th, 2009 5:06pm Report this commentThis woman is facilitating the destruction of the sovereignty of Britain and is therefore a traitor. She should be treated as a traitor, referred to as a traitor, and exposed as a traitor.
Publius
December 17th, 2009 5:46pm Report this commentAs Taki says, kiss my Ashton.
Verity
December 17th, 2009 5:51pm Report this commentAs Peter from Maidstone says, she's a traitor. She has no legitimacy. She's ambulatory garbage and whatever spews out of her mouth or "brain" has no relevance.
I have a feeling they're not going to get away with this. (Not through the agency of David Cameron or the NuCon Pinkos, though. Cameron loves it and has his eye on putting his polished shoes snugly under the top table and travelling first class on the gravy train.)
Gary Williams
December 17th, 2009 5:53pm Report this commentIs this chick on drugs?
salieri
December 17th, 2009 5:55pm Report this commentI propose a simple experiment: every time the word "Europe", "European" or "EU" appears in this lady's vibrant and stimulating prose, mentally substitute the words "Single Parent Family". The result makes just as much sense and instils the same degree of pride and confidence: i.e. none whatever.
Yow Min Lye
December 17th, 2009 6:08pm Report this commentThe 'European External Action Service'. Gosh, I bet the very thought has President I'm-a-Dinner-Jacket quaking in his boots.
Number7
December 17th, 2009 6:14pm Report this commentAnd her point is? - not recognised.
Who is she, what is she and who voted for her?
WHY DO WE HAVE TO LISTEN TO THIS RUBBISH?
PS Expect a glowing report on this on Bruin's Broadcasting Company (AKA Liebore's Poll Tax)
Verity
December 17th, 2009 6:37pm Report this commentWell, they do say that politics is show business for ugly people.
Maybe even for unelected ugly people.
Fearless Frank
December 17th, 2009 6:45pm Report this commentThe Noble baroness is a credit to the quangocracy that nurtured her when she comes out with this resounding phrase, to welcome... "new possibilities to make Europe better and more relevant for its citizens."
What do you mean, Lady Europe?
She adds: "The reputation of the EU is a good one, based on our strong values of freedom and democracy..."
Ah yes democracy... a marvelous thing, even though you've got so far without it.
Watt Tyler
December 17th, 2009 6:52pm Report this comment"Employing a phalanx of EU diplomats when no standardised and encompassing EU foreign policy exists is Brechtian in its absurdity."
No, it is like having a currency as a step to establish a political unity.
This woman should be taken at face value. Our Embassies are about to be turned over to the EU.
And even if you pray your hardest, or keep repeating your wish that David Cameron will finally reveal his true colours on winning an election, and win the country back for you, well it won't happen. You will find that you have been lied to to win your vote. If Cast Iron even wanted you to have an effective parliament that represnted you, and was able to pass its own laws, he couldn't. Weeks ago this woman was already drawing up plans for an EU Diplomatic Service, and still we were looking down our collective noses of UKIP.
She isn't a traitor to the British ruling class, she is just parr for the course. And it is right to say "The Lisbon treaty has not inaugurated change; it has enshrined continuity."
So keep voting for continuity.
denis cooper
December 17th, 2009 6:52pm Report this commentIn fact she has no legitimacy in either of her official posts.
Her term as a Commissioner expired on October 31st, and she is occupying that post unlawfully.
And her position as the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has been created by a treaty which has no legitimacy in this country.
We know that, because William Hague explained it very clearly - the first time being in the Commons on November 12th 2007, I believe:
"... we would have a new treaty in force that lacked democratic legitimacy in this country and in our view gave the EU too much power over our national policies. That would not be acceptable to a Conservative Government and we would not let matters rest there; the right hon. Gentleman can be assured of that."
and repeated on many subsequent occasions.
But we now know that notwithstanding the lack of democratic legitimacy of this treaty, a Conservative Government would in fact let matters rest there and would accept the elevation of this woman to a position which should not exist, and I suspect would also agree to start the process of shutting down British embassies around the world, and of course disposing of the premises so that they could never be re-opened.
Chris lancashire
December 17th, 2009 7:42pm Report this commentI read the headline to the article, read the author and passed on to the next page.
Boudicca
December 17th, 2009 8:47pm Report this commentThe EU's External Action Service, eh? So what's the EU's Internal Action Service for then? To keep the disenfranchised peasants under control?
What a load of garbage. Vote UKIP to get out of this expensive shambles.
Nicholas
December 17th, 2009 9:38pm Report this commentJust what we need - another tier of government to bleed us and boss us.
Rebellion now.
Fearless Frank
December 18th, 2009 12:39am Report this commentChris lancashire December 17th, 2009 7:42pm
I read the headline to the article, read the author and passed on to the next page.
So, nothing to say then, empty-headed Chris?
Austin Barry
December 18th, 2009 7:57am Report this commentI wouldn't worry too much about the EU's inert take on Iran. The US is fast-tracking the manufacture of bunker-busting bombs and building-up strategic oil reserves, while Israel is strangely silent apart from air-raid drills. Consider also the toming of the recent leak in relation to Iran's work on a nuclear bomb trigger device. Should be an interesting first quarter.
mac
December 18th, 2009 8:02am Report this commentOde to Joy.
We are all now citizens of Greater Belgium.
Cuffleyburgers
December 18th, 2009 8:43am Report this commentI'm sorry but the baroness ashton is far too unattractive to be taken seriously as a female aristocrat.
Quite honestly I'd rather sleep with an actress...
Maggie
December 18th, 2009 9:01am Report this commentBaroness Ashton's first 'triumph' is in making sure we can no longer buy bananas from small Caribbean producers. We now have to buy them from wicked American conglomerates. The only people to gain from the arrangement are the American megolomaniacs. In no way were the interests or wishes of Europeans given priority. She's not just a traitor to the UK, she's also a traitor to the EU.
Peter
December 18th, 2009 10:11am Report this commentThere is only one solution which will end the queue of posters complaining about all of this.
IT CANNOT BE CHANGED UNLESS WE WITHDRAW FROM THE EU.
And that's that. No amount of complaining and declaring Ashton a traitor will achieve anything. We were denied a referendum but notwithstanding that the government we elected signed the Treaty after a majority vote in our elected Parliament. We might not like it but that's the way it is.
So hands up who's for withdrawal?
Austin Barry
December 18th, 2009 10:56am Report this commentAlthough she is singularly ill-favoured, Baroness Ashton's looks should not really be a matter for CoffeeHouse comment. Although bovine they are relatively benign when compared with the PM's hideous face which increasingly epitomises the corruption and venality of our ruling elite.
Perhaps in Gordon's attic there is a portrait of the handsome young Ganymede who once created such a flutter in the hearts and trousers of the louche Provincetown set. Were he to stroll along the Cape Cod beaches now I suspect that even the implacable stone crabs would retreat in horror.
Verity
December 18th, 2009 1:37pm Report this commentPeter is correct when he says the only way out of this quagmire is withdrawal from the EU. We'd be instantly richer, for a start.
But it's not going to happen under Lying Labour or the Lying Conservatives, both of which are signed up to the agenda. Of the two, I hate dave (I'm not going to capitalise his name from now on) the most because he is a traitor not only to Britain, but to the entire Conservative ethos and it is criminal that he, a traitor to the cause, is nominally leading the party.
I'm voting UKIP this time, and I believe millions more will do so, too. If the Tories want to be in with a chance for the next election, the have to dump cameron. ("Cameron" means shrimp, in Spanish, by the way.)
JohnAnt
December 20th, 2009 1:41pm Report this comment"her objectives" - so this is about her, is it? I suppose as she doesn't represent us or anyone, she can have whatever objectives she likes.
'My first priority'...should be to find someone to advise on colour co-ordination, dress sense and self-presentation.
As for 'offering added value to what their countries do' - in management terms, 'added value' is about rationalising resources, and improving standards and performance for the same financial outlay. What Ashton means is the precise opposite - throwing out more taxpayers' money and duplicating resources.
Back to top