Labour calls cease-fire on binge drinking
David Blackburn 3:04pm
The government has sued for peace. The Observer reports that in the face of lobbying from the drinks industry, the government has dropped its mandatory code on the sale of alcohol, which Gordon Brown first brewed-up during the local election campaign. Labour excuses the u-turn on the grounds that vulnerable pubs and drinks retail industry must remain viable during this fragile economic situation. On the face of it, that is sensible; delve deeper and that excuse does not hold.
Of course, there’s no sense in endangering businesses by punishing all drinks deals and ‘happy hour’ promotions. However, aspects of the code would have outlawed promotions such as ‘all you can drink for a tenner’ or ‘have a quart of vodka poured directly down your throat’. Binge drinking is a two pronged problem: drinking to excess and the frenzied raucousness that retailers encourage. Eradicate the latter and the former is diminished. The government has decided against such action, perpetuating divisiveness.
Last night, I walked into Victoria station and witnessed the most bizarre tableau unfold. Two men lifted a third into handstand, whereupon he proceeded to drink one of the more manly alco-pops upside down, defying gravity. Having completed his Herculean labours, he was returned to his feet, when he suddenly, and very violently, vomited. Shortly after, he melted to the floor in the manner of the Wicked Witch of the West. The station’s wider environs resembled Holby City, such was the preponderance of prostrate bodies and self-pitying moans. I don’t see why I should be forced to slalom through this morass.
There’s an prescient irony in one industry figure’s comments: “We can probably assume that the mandatory code is face down in the water”. Recession or recovery, profits come with responsibilities and no one has the inalienable right to get paralytic and fight. The government should not have succumbed to pressure and dropped this code in its entirety. The only positive I discern is that this decision will infuriate Sir Liam Donaldson.



Previous






The Anti Christ
December 20th, 2009 3:23pm Report this commentYou seem to be trying to describe common sense. I thought it was a foregone conclusion that common sense doesn't work anymore. You can't have it all ways Dave.
TrevorsDen
December 20th, 2009 3:28pm Report this commentCome come ... this is all about what new labour proudly touted as 'joined up government' back inn1997 (boy how long ago does that feel? Come back John Major all is forgiven.)
The chief Medical officer cautions against youth drinking - drinking in general - and the next day Labour retract all their 'binge' drinking laws!
'Simples!'
PC
"Shortly after, he melted to the floor in the manner of the Wicked Witch of the West"
The correct phrase is "he went down like a sack of whelks"
TGF UKIP
December 20th, 2009 3:41pm Report this commentNothing, absolutely nothing would do more to help the pub trade than a modification, or preferably total repeal, of the absurdly draconian anti-smoking laws.
Thes are laws that a sensible, non PC Tory Party would, of course, promise to re-visit. Unfortunately .............
Maria
December 20th, 2009 4:08pm Report this commenti would say - are they mad but we all know the answer to that one. Bread and circuses I think is the appropriate response.
AndyinBrum
December 20th, 2009 4:28pm Report this commentI'm not arguing its an issue, but people have been moaning about the passed out drunks in the street/station/bus stops since alcohol was invented.
Naomi Muse
December 20th, 2009 4:46pm Report this commentWhatever happened to the old Dixon of Dock Green collar of 'Drunk and Disorderly'?
Anyone who cannot stand up and walk about has to be drunk and disorderly so where are the police on this, and, as far as your experience in Victoria Station is concerned where are the Transport Police?
We shouldn't have to walk through all of that slalom at all. National Rail should ban certain individuals from its premises, the police should charge people with being D&D and pubs and bars should be refusing to supply further drink to folks who are obviously overdone with it.
Common sense has escaped and cowardice has come in instead, methinks.
Naomi Muse
December 20th, 2009 4:52pm Report this commentExit common sense and common decency and enter cowardice and public disorder.
As all people lying about the worse the wear for drink, and certainly people vomiting after consuming even manly alcopops, are drunk and disorderly, why are they not being charged for it?
As to your ghastly slalom across Victoria Station, where were the police and the tranport police?
All binge drinkers who are not able to get themselves home without making a mess or bothering others should be done for being D&D and fined after a night in the cells. A few fines of £1k per incident would put a stop to it.
Chuck Unsworth
December 20th, 2009 5:03pm Report this commentHogarth.
Snowman
December 20th, 2009 5:28pm Report this commentanother chunk of the population likely to cast their votes for nuLabour.
john miller
December 20th, 2009 5:43pm Report this commentDeep in the bowels of Number 10 is the Chief Coin Tosser - one of the many tossers there, but this one is in charge of The Coin.
The Coin is used to determine the government policy du jour. Having to issue a policy announcement every day takes a lot of resources and at least (in the old days) one sofa.
Now, the sofa has been thrown out and there are only two people presenting the Chief Coin Tosser with alternative policies of the day.
Hence the decision to announce urgent action on teen drinking yesterday and a relaxation of the intended bans on alcohol sales.
See also the move to sell tobacco products in plain wrappers and the cessation of that policy (h/t leg-iron).
JohnBUK
December 20th, 2009 6:45pm Report this commentLook, the issue is to stop people behaving criminally. If their behaviour after drinking to excess is criminal then the police should do their job, arrest them, bring them to court the next day and, for once, the magistrates have the power to "hurt" the miscreants.
At the moment the bunch of lunatics masquerading as the government would rather punish EVERYONE via new laws or new taxes. After all we musn't be judgmental must we?
Is there any danger of anyone doing their job properly at any time?
Sam ARMSTRONG
December 20th, 2009 7:29pm Report this commentThis is northern European drinking culture, that's all. There's nothing abnormal per se in people behaving like this, they do so only because they are not properly controlled. If they had Police breathing down their necks they would simply remember their manners and stop. It's cold here, and we have a hard work ethic, and a long winter ahead, and not much to smile about on the news. People, if not controlled, are going to let off steam this way. It just needs to be Policed properly and diverted to non-public places.
Beer Moth
December 20th, 2009 7:52pm Report this commentHogarth indeed Chuck. It can't be long now before bear-baiting is brought back.
Yow Min Lye
December 20th, 2009 8:38pm Report this commentNew Labour is an illusion caused by lack of alcohol.
Nero
December 20th, 2009 8:57pm Report this commentBread [cheap booze] and circuses while [UK] burns.
That's Nulab caring and sharing. Staying in power while the dumbed down kidadults destroy themselves and poison the UK for the remaining sane people.
I travelled to London on Friday morning, and the train was full of empty cans, McWaste wrappers and smelled of alcohol soaked vomit. Charming, I thought.
Rhoda Klapp
December 20th, 2009 9:20pm Report this commentWe have laws against public drunkenness. Why not enforce them? Oh no, the lawmakers now would rather punish the innocent in order to enable the guilty.
The police should spoil the evening of public drunks (of whatever age and social class, binge-drinkers or no) by detaining those who are incapable for their own good (not imprison them, oh no) until they are able to take responsibility for themselves.
Steve John Tierney
December 20th, 2009 9:24pm Report this commentRubbish. It was a patently stupid idea and whether you feel personally put out by drunken behaviour or not, was shooting at entirely the wrong target. It's great that it was dumped. And it's rare I congratulate Labour on a policy move.
cityboozer
December 20th, 2009 10:09pm Report this commentIt's the same as the wider anti-social/criminal problem. The Powers That Should Be have withdrawn to their bunkers but have not returned to us the right (or the ownership interest) to fix the problem ourselves.
I have seen similar scenes in Victoria and other stations. How can it be allowed to go on at least three nights of the week (Thursday is London's favourite drinking day, presumably because people want to be paid for their hangovers) every week of the year, yet my home town's church hall cannot get a licence for alcohol at a dance or wedding more than one day a month?
Joined-up, my arse.
Dorothy Wilson
December 21st, 2009 9:41am Report this commentAndyinBrum: streets, stations and bus stops were in somewhat short supply when alcohol was first invented.
Nero: You don't have to travel on a train to see piles of fast food wrappers, drinks bottles and even beer cans. I live in a smallish village and the verges and hedgerows on our lanes are full of them. It seems people simply chuck this rubbish out of their cars. Currently, there is even a cooker in the ditch at the road out of the village that leads on to the Fosse Way.
It is all part of a culture - as is binge drinking - that preaches that "I" can do what suits me and two fingers to anyone else.
Bob Frost
December 21st, 2009 10:56am Report this commentI think it was bit naughty using a picture of Speaker Bercow's wife to illustrate the article..........
Stuart Beamish
December 21st, 2009 12:03pm Report this commentIf they were serious about controlling drinking they would stop supermarkets selling alcohol ~ However, I don't think Lord Sainsbury would like that.
Tiberius
December 21st, 2009 1:07pm Report this commentUnfortunately I seem to have that effect on all attractive young women.
Chuck Unsworth
December 21st, 2009 5:23pm Report this comment@ Beer Moth
PMQs is, of course, the overly sanitised NuLab version of Bear Baiting. Personally I'd like to see altogether more blood on the carpet.....
Marcher Baron
December 21st, 2009 6:25pm Report this commentInstances of public drunkenness dropped significantly after the new licensing laws were introduced in WW1. The idea was to stop munitions workers handling explosives while under the influence, but it had a knock on effect throughout society. Labour needs to look at its own policies.
Verity
December 26th, 2009 1:08am Report this commentChuck Unsworth - "Hogarth". My thought precisely. Gin Lane.
Except these people, the socialist slithering sleazoids currently in power, are creating this scenario intentionally. It's not a by-product. It was created with malice aforethought.
Why?
To gain more control, by more rules, of the group formerly known as "the electorate".
Britain's down the pan. Far, far, far worse than any other country in the West. Because the communists in Britain are the most vicious and the most thuggish and have the greatest hunger to control the lives of others. And the Brits, possibly due to so many generations of well-earned self-confidence, were not on their guard. They were not alert.
It happened so fast, it beggars belief.
Back to top