PMQs Live Blog
David Blackburn 11:59am12:00: Stay tuned for live coverage. As Gordon Brown is still in Northern Ireland, Harriet Harman will face William Hague today.
12:03: Tory John Whittingdale opens up with Army compensation, a hot topic over the summer.
Harman replies that these issues are being addressed by Ainsworth and the MoD.
12:04: Will the government do more to support manufacturing?
Harman points to government action throughout the recession.
12:05: Here's Hague, who wishes Brown luck in Northern Ireland and welcomes the appointment of Mark Sedwell as NATO envoy to Afghanistan. (See Daniel Korski from Monday for more details).
12:06: Hague wants the forthcoming Afghanistan Conference to be realistic, on top of his brief here.
Harman replies by saying she's surprised Hague isn't supporting current action in Afghanistan - silly party political point that Hague sweeps aside contemptuously.
12:08: Will the government follow Obama's lead on a break between retail and investment banking? All this is kicking off in Davos as we speak.
Harman says the Americans have a different system.
12:09: Hague reckons that Brown's wrong again, and asks that Brown drop the destructive Tobin tax and raise a levy on banks to pay for the insurance the taxpayer has given them.
Harman responds by harping on about fiscal stimulus - I'm mean really you could only script this.
12:11: Hague is clear that Brown's approach to regulation is wrong, as he is on all matters financial. Measured stuff from Hague, concluding with the phrase: "A golden age for banking? When are they going to fix the banks".
Harman tries another favoured line that the Tories are talking down Britain. Didn't answer a question.
12:14: Vince Cable on the news about equality - why hasn't it improved after 13 years of Labour government?
Harman points to what she alleges is the report's conclusion that inequality widened under the previous Conservative government and that Labour has stemmed it.
The first half of that answer is true; the second is utterly false. The report concludes that the gap has widened still further but the pace of inequality has slowed, marginally.
12:16: Cable makes that very point - and then points to the unfair tax system.
Harman repeats her initial argument about the tax and benefits system contributing to this imagined stemming, ignoring conveniently that both penalise work and contribute to inequality - considering it's her hobby-horse she's spectacularly ill-informed.
12:18: A question from an SNP member about the "biggest lie in British politics". That's right it's Iraq and Chilcot again, all prepare for the main event on Friday, which is, bizarrely, how Harman answers.
12:19: Plant alert: David Chayter on a local school that's done well. Harman thanks him for his support.
12:20: David Jones reminds Harman about New Labour's very relaxed attitude to people getting filthy rich; is she comfortable at how Tony Blair is going about it?
Ha! Ha! Harman repsonds, with a straight face, by saying that the government is detirmined to support social mobility! As if Fettes, Oxford and the Bar weren't good enough? Then again, she is an aristocrat.
Howls from the Tories; Bercow intervenes saying he "wants to hear the answer". We all do - Tommy Cooper couldn't have been more hilarious.
12:24: Anne Main on the Equitable Life scandal - will there be court action? No.
12:26: Former housing minister Chris Mullin reckons that outsourcing in housing has contributed to social inequality by denying people pensions etc. It's a very good point - private sector pensions are a forthcoming problem.
12:28: Labour MP Louise Ellman asks about the rising tide of anti-semitism in Britain - there will be a debate on this tomorrow.
12:29: Geraldine Smith asks about the Post Office pension deficit. This issue is returning to the fore, and Harman argues that enough is being done to confront that deficit. Fine, but the Post Office's pensions mess deters potential buyers.
12:31: Labour MP Brian Iddon asks a plant about science teacher numbers given the Tories' plan (blah, blah, blah)
12:32: Anthony Steen on human trafficking. Awful statistics from Haitian trafficking. Steen wants aid to set up a scheme to ensure children remain safe.
Harman congratulates him for his tireless work on this issue, but doesn't pledge anything.
VERDICT: Car crash for Harman - though this time not distracted by her mobile phone. The social mobility answer to the question about Blair, given the report that was published today, defied belief. It wasn't a question of would not, Harman could not answer a single question that Hague put to her. Hague skillfully proved how Brown (with his Tobin taxes and whatnot) is isolated from international opinion, and he resisted ridiculing Harman, leaving her to achieve that herself with an almost cavalier brilliance. Cable stung the Equalities Queen effectively, though I disagree with the thrust of his analysis: there is more to the problem than just tax. The Labour party cannot seriously consider Harman as a potential leader? Surely not?



Previous






AndyinBrum
January 27th, 2010 12:11pm Report this commentOh god, I miss Prescott, she's awful.
I look forward to Lloyd's analysis on how Gordon whipped Dave in today's PMQs
AndyinBrum
January 27th, 2010 12:14pm Report this commentharman's just said that we need a fiscal stimulus to get us out of recovery. So there we have it Government admits the fiscal stimulus has kept us out of recovery
Vulture
January 27th, 2010 12:20pm Report this commentHow can that arch trougher David Chaytor have the gall to show his snout and actually grunt!
He should be in jail.
Vulture
January 27th, 2010 12:30pm Report this commentHague was strong and sharp. Stark contrast to we know who.
Harpic was utterly, utterly awful. Just embarrassingly bad. Is she there to try and make Bruin loook good?
welshy
January 27th, 2010 12:37pm Report this commentHarperson is clearly a bit of muppet - but you do feel that she will go away and do something about the points raised rather than silly "do nothing" etc answers. Does anyone know that dam is doing?! Could the spectator get a "dam cam" feature?
Interesting that labour mps are starting to ask non planted constituency questions with an eye on election (e.g. heathrow airport runway impact on local people) - I hope this proves to be 4.5 years too late. Who knows a labour mp may even ask about breaking manifesto pledge on lisbon referendum? Well maybe not...
James
January 27th, 2010 12:47pm Report this commentWatching the Daily Politics before PMQs, I could not believe the BBC is harder on the Tories for not having detailed tax and spend policies, than Labour, who have delivered 0.1% growth on top of massive debt and NO plans to reduce that debt.
JONNY
January 27th, 2010 12:56pm Report this comment'Hague was strong and sharp'
but doubt very much Vulture
if he'd have got a glove on Brown.
the shade of dr kelly
January 27th, 2010 1:46pm Report this commentoff topic but could one of you bods at the spectator do some research on what the point of northern ireland is?
especially - what does it pay into the exchequer and what the government spends back on NIreland etc.
it seems that they get loads spent on them, generate very little and want to have duplicated government costing the british taxpayer even more.
i would be delighted if it was handed over to the republic if my suspicions are true!
toni
January 27th, 2010 1:49pm Report this comment@James. That Andrew Neil.
Such a BBC and Labour patsy eh?
Daring to ask about a much trumpeted Tory policy on supporting marriage and having the temerity to ask for some detail?
Pickles was his usual blustering self, but resorted to whining and complaining. Pathetic.
Charles Flaccidwidger
January 27th, 2010 1:53pm Report this commentJonny - only because Brown never answers a bloody question.
Pat
January 27th, 2010 2:16pm Report this commentFor all those Lloyd Evans fans eagerly waiting his report on how Ms Harman wiped the floor with William Haque at PMQ's, he is unavoidable detained at Specsavers getting some new glasses. He will be along soon and the truth will out on her masterful performance. Haque 1. Harman 10
JONNY
January 27th, 2010 2:37pm Report this commentExactly my point Charles Flacciwidger.
Hague also would have got sweet nowhere.
James
January 27th, 2010 2:42pm Report this commenttoni:
No problem at all with questions being asked. However, why ask for details from an opposition that is not in a position to implement policy, when you won't ask the same questions of a government that is.
You can hardly blame the Tories for not wanting to give away details of their first budget, when they announced the IHT policy, Labour promptly stole it.
Jon Snow conducted a far more balanced interview on C4 news and grilled both parties on policy.
toni
January 27th, 2010 5:20pm Report this comment@James. Do give over.
Labour is scrutinised continually about every thing, silly to suggest otherwise, but offering to pay couples to marry is not on the agenda.
Cameron has nailed his colours to the mast on paying to marry, so it's not unreasonable to ask the ...Chairman is he? Pickles a couple of questions about it.
Neil was only skewering him gently, not really expecting to be enlightened; I mean, that'd be a first as you suggest.
Btw, it's the first time on a Tory website I've read that Jon Snow conducted a 'balanced' interview.
The man's (allegedly) a shameless old Labour hack isn’t he?
James
January 27th, 2010 7:06pm Report this commenttoni:
Yes he is. I surprised myself typing that!
Back to top